Holmquist, M., & Johansson, A. 2019. Employee-Driven Innovation: An Intervention Using Action Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(5): 44-53. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1240

Callari, T. C., Moody, L., Saunders, J., Ward, G., Holliday, N., & Woodley, J. 2019. Exploring Participation Needs and Motivational Requirements When Engaging Older Adults in an Emerging Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 38-49. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1223

de Jong, K., Daellenbach, U., Davenport, S., Haar, J., & Leitch, S. 2019. Giving Science Innovation Systems a 'Nudge'. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(10): 51-61. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1275

Schuurman, D., Herregodts, A. - L., Georges, A., & Rits, O. 2019. Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 63-73. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1225

Hartmann, M., Laubengaier, D., & Foerstl, K. 2019. Live and Let Die: On the Management of Creativity. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(10): 16-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1272

Jussila, J., Kukkamäki, J., Mäntyneva, M., & Heinisuo, J. 2019. Open Data and Open Source Enabling Smart City Development: A Case Study in Häme Region. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9): 26-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1266

Einola, S., Kohtamäki, M., & Hietikko, H. 2019. Open Strategy in a Smart City. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9): 36-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1267

Chronéer, D., Ståhlbröst, A., & Habibipour, A. 2019. Urban Living Labs: Towards an Integrated Understanding of their Key Components. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 50-62. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1224

Suominen, A. Helena, Halvari, S., & Jussila, J. 2019. World Heritage meets Smart City in an Urban-Educational Hackathon in Rauma. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9): 45-54. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1268

Schroth, F., & Häußermann, J. Jakob. 2018. Collaboration Strategies in Innovation Ecosystems: An Empirical Study of the German Microelectronics and Photonics Industries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(11): 4-12. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1195

McPhee, C., Gupta, D. S., & Hossain, M. 2018. Editorial: Frugal Innovation (April 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(4): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1147

McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2018. Editorial: Living Labs (December 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1200

Imset, M., Haavardtun, P., & Tannum, M. Stian. 2018. Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 26-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1203

Kunttu, L., Huttu, E., & Neuvo, Y. 2018. How Doctoral Students and Graduates Can Facilitate Boundary Spanning between Academia and Industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(6): 48-54. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1164

Haukipuro, L., Väinämö, S., & Hyrkäs, P. 2018. Innovation Instruments to Co-Create Needs-Based Solutions in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 22-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1156

Haukipuro, L., Väinämö, S., & Hyrkäs, P. 2018. Innovation Instruments to Co-Create Needs-Based Solutions in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 22-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1156

Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Habib, C. 2018. Key Constructs and a Definition of Living Labs as Innovation Platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 51-62. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1205

Hyypiä, M., & Khan, R. 2018. Overcoming Barriers to Frugal Innovation: Emerging Opportunities for Finnish SMEs in Brazilian Markets. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(4): 38-48. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1151

Hoppe, M. 2018. The Prime Mover Matrix: A Conversation Piece for Building Strategic Innovative Capacity. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(7): 5-13. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1167

Hirte, R. 2018. The Role of Middle Managers in the Implementation of a Corporate Incubator: A Case Study in the Automotive Sector. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(7): 31-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1169

Habibipour, A., Georges, A., Ståhlbröst, A., Schuurman, D., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. 2018. A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Drop-Out Behaviour in Living Lab Field Tests. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 5-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1155

Sakyi-Gyinae, K., & Holmlund, M. 2018. What Do Business Customers Value? An Empirical Study of Value Propositions in a Servitization Context. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 36-43. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1157

Phillips, M. A., Harrington, T. S., & Srai, J. Singh. 2017. Convergent Innovation in Emerging Healthcare Technology Ecosystems: Addressing Complexity and Integration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(9): 44-54. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1105

Eskelinen, T., Räsänen, T., Santti, U., Happonen, A., & Kajanus, M. 2017. Designing a Business Model for Environmental Monitoring Services Using Fast MCDS Innovation Support Tools. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 36-46. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1119

Santti, U., Eskelinen, T., Rajahonka, M., Villman, K., & Happonen, A. 2017. Effects of Business Model Development Projects on Organizational Culture: A Multiple Case Study of SMEs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8): 15-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1096