Export 6 results:
Author Title Type [ Year(Asc)]
Filters: Keyword is user involvement  [Clear All Filters]
2021
Huang, J. Hong, & Thomas, E. 2021. A Review of Living Lab Research and Methods for User Involvement. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 88-107. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1467
PDF icon Download this article as PDF (4.33 MB)
2020
Kunttu, L., & Neuvo, Y. 2020. The Role of Academics, Users, and Customers in Industrial Product Development. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(3): 60-69. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1337
PDF icon Download this article as PDF (767.42 KB)
2018
Haukipuro, L., Väinämö, S., & Hyrkäs, P. 2018. Innovation Instruments to Co-Create Needs-Based Solutions in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 22-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1156
PDF icon Download this article as a PDF (2.7 MB)
2016
Georges, A., Schuurman, D., & Vervoort, K. 2016. Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959
PDF icon Download this article (749.86 KB)
Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2016. The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956
PDF icon Download this article (757.45 KB)
2013
Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2013. Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748
PDF icon Download this article (1.06 MB)
Breadbasket