Haukipuro, L., Väinämö, S., & Hyrkäs, P. 2018. Innovation Instruments to Co-Create Needs-Based Solutions in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 22-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1156

Vilariño, F., Karatzas, D., & Valcarce, A. 2018. The Library Living Lab: A Collaborative Innovation Model for Public Libraries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 17-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1202

Vilariño, F., Karatzas, D., & Valcarce, A. 2018. The Library Living Lab: A Collaborative Innovation Model for Public Libraries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 17-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1202

De Maeijer, E., Van Hout, T., Weggeman, M., & Post, G. 2018. Tread Carefully: Managing Identities and Expectations in High-Tech Industry–Academia Collaborations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(10): 29-43. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1191

Korhonen, H. M. E., Still, K., Seppänen, M., Kumpulainen, M., Suominen, A., & Valkokari, K. 2017. The Core Interaction of Platforms: How Startups Connect Users and Producers. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(9): 17-29. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1103

Steen, K., & van Bueren, E. 2017. The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7): 21-33. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1088

Santti, U., Eskelinen, T., Rajahonka, M., Villman, K., & Happonen, A. 2017. Effects of Business Model Development Projects on Organizational Culture: A Multiple Case Study of SMEs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8): 15-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1096

Eskelinen, T., Rajahonka, M., Villman, K., & Santti, U. 2017. Improving Internal Communication Management in SMEs: Two Case Studies in Service Design. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(6): 16-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1081

Valkokari, K., Seppänen, M., Mäntylä, M., & Jylhä-Ollila, S. 2017. Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(3): 12-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1061

Valgeirsdottir, D., & Onarheim, B. 2017. Realistic Creativity Training for Innovation Practitioners: The Know–Recognize–React Model. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(6): 5-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1080

Valdez-de-Leon, O. 2016. A Digital Maturity Model for Telecommunications Service Providers. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8): 19-32. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1008

Georges, A., Schuurman, D., & Vervoort, K. 2016. Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959

Antikainen, M., & Valkokari, K. 2016. A Framework for Sustainable Circular Business Model Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7): 5-12. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1000

Viitanen, J. 2016. Profiling Regional Innovation Ecosystems as Functional Collaborative Systems: The Case of Cambridge. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(12): 6-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1038

Ullrich, A., & Vladova, G. 2016. Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(4): 34-40. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/980

Valkokari, K. 2015. Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8): 17-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/919

Veeckman, C., & van der Graaf, S. 2015. The City as Living Laboratory: Empowering Citizens with the Citadel Toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3): 6-17. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/877

Veeckman, C., & van der Graaf, S. 2015. The City as Living Laboratory: Empowering Citizens with the Citadel Toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3): 6-17. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/877

McPhee, C., Vargo, S. L., Toivonen, M., & Rajala, R. 2015. Editorial: Technology in Service Innovation (February 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(2): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/868

Valkokari, K. 2015. Q&A. In the Innovation Game, Why Do So Many Companies Stay on the Sidelines?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(11): 35-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/944

Rajala, R., Westerlund, M., Vuori, M., & Hares, J. - P. 2013. From Idea Crowdsourcing to Managing User Knowledge. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 23-31. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/750

Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2013. Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748

Craigen, D., Vandeth, D., & Walsh, D. ’A. 2013. Managing Cybersecurity Research and Experimental Development: The REVO Approach. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(7): 34-41. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/705

Vanhaverbeke, W. 2013. Rethinking Open Innovation Beyond the Innovation Funnel. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(4): 6-10. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/673

VonFange, M., & Lavigne, D. 2011. Cost Optimization Through Open Source Software. Open Source Business Resource, (January 2011). http://timreview.ca/article/408