Windawi, J. 2022. The Diffusion of Blockchain as a General Purpose Technology Driving Digital Transformation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 12(1/2): 22010201. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1478

Kunttu, L., Kalliomäki, H., Dan, S., & Kuusisto, J. 2021. Developing Social Impact Evaluation Methods for Research: viewpoints on commercialization and sustainability. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(5): 44-53. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1441

Brecht, P., Hendriks, D., Stroebele, A., Hahn, C. H., & Wolff, I. 2021. Discovery and Validation of Business Models: How B2B Startups can use Business Experiments. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(3): 17-31. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1426

Sandstrom, G. 2021. Distributed Ledger Technologies and Social Machines: How to “smartify” the economy with blockchain-based digital extension services?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(6): 42-57. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1449

Singh, S., Saurabh, P., & Bhatt, N. 2020. Demystifiying the Meaning of Transnational Entrepreneurship: Indian transnational entrepreneurs in comparative perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(11): 47-59. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1403

John, P. Kan, Lear, E., Decosta, P. L. ’Espoir, Gregor, S., Dann, S., & Sun, R. 2020. Designing a Visual Tool for Teaching and Learning Front-End Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(9). http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1386

Dethine, B., Enjolras, M., & Monticolo, D. 2020. Digitalization and SMEs’ Export Management: Impacts on Resources and Capabilities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(4): 18-34. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1344

Hervé, A., Schmitt, C., & Baldegger, R. 2020. Digitalization, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Internationalization of Micro-, Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(4): 5-17. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1343

Westerlund, M. 2020. Digitalization, Internationalization and Scaling of Online SMEs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(4): 48-57. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1346

Dankbaar, B. 2019. Design Rules for ‘Triple Helix’ Organizations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11): 54-63. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1283

Soutter, L., Ferguson, K., & Neubert, M. 2019. Digital Payments: Impact Factors and Mass Adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(7): 41-55. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1254

Haukipuro, L., & Väinämö, S. 2019. Digital User Involvement in a Multi-Context Living Lab Environment. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(10): 27-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1273

Guertler, M., Sick, N., & Kriz, A. 2019. A Discipline-Spanning Overview of Action Research and Its Implications for Technology and Innovation Management. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(4): 48-65. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1233

Kayser, V., Nehrke, B., & Zubovic, D. 2018. Data Science as an Innovation Challenge: From Big Data to Value Proposition. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(3): 16-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1143

Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2018. Does Entrepreneurial Marketing Underrate Competition?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(9): 16-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1183

Joshi, T. 2018. The Dynamics of Knowledge Sharing in the Biotechnology Industry: An Indian Perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(1): 5-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1129

Steen, K., & van Bueren, E. 2017. The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7): 21-33. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1088

Brankaert, R., & Ouden, Eden. 2017. The Design-Driven Living Lab: A New Approach to Exploring Solutions to Complex Societal Challenges. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 44-51. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1049

Eskelinen, T., Räsänen, T., Santti, U., Happonen, A., & Kajanus, M. 2017. Designing a Business Model for Environmental Monitoring Services Using Fast MCDS Innovation Support Tools. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 36-46. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1119

Giones, F., & Brem, A. 2017. Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5): 44-51. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1076

Eckelt, D., Dülme, C., Gausemeier, J., & Hemel, S. 2016. Detecting White Spots in Innovation-Driven Intellectual Property Management. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7): 34-47. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1003

Haines, T. 2016. Developing a Startup and Innovation Ecosystem in Regional Australia. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(6): 24-32. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/994

Trudel, C., Cobb, S., Momtahan, K., Brintnell, J., & Mitchell, A. 2016. Developing Tacit Knowledge of Complex Systems: The Value of Early Empirical Inquiry in Healthcare Design. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(9): 28-38. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1017

Valdez-de-Leon, O. 2016. A Digital Maturity Model for Telecommunications Service Providers. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8): 19-32. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1008

Muegge, S., & Craigen, D. 2015. A Design Science Approach to Constructing Critical Infrastructure and Communicating Cybersecurity Risks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(6): 6-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/902