<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mika Westerlund</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ishdeep Singh</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mervi Rajahonka</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Seppo Leminen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Project Summaries as a Predictor of Crowdfunding Success</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">backers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">failure</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">funding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fundraising</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kickstarter</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">prediction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">project</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">success</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">topic modelling</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1472</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33-44</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Crowdfunding has emerged in recent years as an important alternative means for technology entrepreneurs to raise funds for their products and business ideas. While the success rate of crowdfunding projects is somewhat low, scholarly understanding of what distinguishes projects that reach their fundraising goals from those that fail remains incomplete. Further, studies on crowdfunding success often examine a number of variables that make predicting success a challenge for entrepreneurs wiling to use crowdfunding. This study uses topic modelling on a data set of over 21,000 technology projects from Kickstarter to investigate if short-text project summaries can reveal predictors of fundraising success on crowdfunding platforms. The results indicate that compared to those that fail in fundraising, project summaries of successfully funded technology projects put forward more trendy topics, use wording that reflects novelty, and focus on solving a social problem. Our results contribute to theory and practice by suggesting the importance of summarizing project content for crowdfunding success.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11-12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Ishdeep Singh is a web developer at the ITS web services Team at Carleton University. He is a technology enthusiast and has completed his master's in Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program from Carleton University. He has worked with big consulting firms - Infosys as well as small-scale digital marketing and real estate technology startups. Ishdeep is an inventive IT professional receptive to novel technologies and measures that are specially associated with societal benefits. He is proficient in researching and analyzing data to identify, create and execute technological problems related to the Implementation, Adaptation and scalability of Products. His present research interests include business technology strategy, social analytics, technology optimization, adaptation strategy, SME and marketing.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences
Mervi Rajahonka, DSc (Econ), MSc (Tech), LLM, works as RDI Specialist in the field of Digital Economy at South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences Xamk, Finland, and as Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Canada. Her research interests include digitalization, entrepreneurship, business models, working women, service innovations and sustainable logistics. Her research has been published in numerous publications and international refereed journals. Her publications are listed on Google Scholar.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of South-Eastern Norway
Seppo Leminen is Drammen City Municipality chaired (Full) Professor of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the USN School of Business at the University of South-Eastern Norway in Norway, an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Finland and an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management in the School of Science at Aalto University. He is an Associate Editor in Techovation and an Associate editor in BRQ, Business Research Quarterly. His current research topics includes digital business models and ecosystems (cf. Internet of Things), robotics, block chains, living labs, innovation ecosystems, collaborative and networked models of innovations, collaborative methods of innovations, as well as management and marketing models for different types of companies. Results from his research have been reported in Industrial Marketing Management, the Journal of Cleaner Production, the Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, the Journal of Business &amp; Industrial Marketing, Management Decision, the International Journal of Innovation Management, and the Technology Innovation Management Review, among many others.</style></custom4><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gregory Sandstrom</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Insights (June 2020)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bitcoin</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">blockchain</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crypto assets</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cryptocurrencies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">developing countries.</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">distributed ledger technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Employeedriven innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurial finance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethereum</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Financial industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FinTech</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ICOs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IEO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intellectual property rights</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">internationalization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IT industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">job autonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mining industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">moral hazard</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">need for autonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">new company</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter's Five Forces framework</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">regulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling company value</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling-up</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">self-leadership</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">signaling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainability</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technological environment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology readiness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">token offering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">token sales</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tokenization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value proposition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">value proposition alignment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">venture capital</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1363</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.

Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria).

Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the TIM Review. He is a former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University (2012-2017), and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University (2016-2017) in Vilnius, Lithuania. He completed a PhD from the Faculty of Sociology at St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science (2010). He was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council (2013-2015), for which he conducted research visits to the Copernican Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (Krakow), the University of Edinburgh's Extended Knowledge Project, Cambridge University's History and Philosophy of Science Department, and Virginia State University's Science and Technology Studies program, as well as previously at the Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems (2010-2011). He was affiliated with the Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking, leading student and faculty language and communications workshops, most recently (2013, 2014, 2017) in Yangon, Myanmar. He is a promoter and builder of blockchain distributed ledger technology systems and digital extension services.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jahja Rrustemi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nils S. Tuchschmid</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fundraising Campaigns in a Digital Economy: Lessons from a Swiss Synthetic Diamond Venture's Initial Coin Offering (ICO)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bitcoin</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">blockchain</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crypto assets</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cryptocurrencies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">distributed ledger technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurial finance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethereum</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Financial industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FinTech</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ICOs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IEO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">moral hazard.</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">signaling</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">token offering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">token sales</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tokenization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">venture capital</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1368</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">53-63</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">As economies digitalize and many local businesses gradually internationalize, crowdfunding platforms have offered a new way for ventures to raise capital. Relying on distributed ledger technology (DLT, blockchain), the method of &quot;tokenization&quot; now seems to be the next way for digital economics to be actualised in practise. Digitalizing some of the production and selling processes through crypto-tokenization technology has brought with it new perspectives and opportunities. Any thorough consideration of the logic of &quot;distributed systems&quot; applied to economics is bound to see that it potentially brings considerable disruptions and significant changes in how companies get access to funding. Cryptocurrencies, and subsequently &quot;tokens&quot; initially issued from &quot;initial coin offerings&quot; (ICOs) have answered an obvious need for efficient, borderless, and secure flows of capital. This article first summarizes what early academic research tells us about ICOs based on DLTs and their factors of success. We then use the case of LakeDiamond, a Swiss venture in the business of growing and polishing synthetic diamonds, to present and contextualize the process of holding an ICO, which ultimately did not succeed. In the final section, we present two fund raising models that have recently gained traction and popularity, namely &quot;security token offerings&quot; (STOs) and &quot;initial exchange offerings&quot; (IEOs), and highlight their main advantages compared to ICOs.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Haute Ecole de Gestion Fribourg (HEG-FR)
Jahja Rrustemi is a scientific collaborator at the Haute Ecole de Gestion Fribourg (HEG-FR), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland. He holds a Master of Science in Wealth Management at the University of Geneva. The main focus of his research relates to Portfolio Allocation Methods, Risk Minimization, Forward-looking Risk Measures as well as Cryptocurrencies and the Tokenization of the economy.
</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Haute Ecole de Gestion Fribourg (HEG-FR)
Nils S. Tuchschmid is professor of Finance and head of the Finance Institute at the Haute Ecole de Gestion Fribourg (HEG-FR), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland. Before joining HEG-FR, Nils was a Partner, Head of Tactical Trading Strategies and Chairman of the Investment Committee at Tages Group. Previously, he was the Co-Head of the Alternative Funds Advisory team at UBS and Head of Multi-Manager Portfolios at Credit-Suisse. He also worked as Strategist and Head of quantitative research and alternative investments at Banque Cantonale Vaudoise. Nils was Professor of Banking and Finance at HEG Geneva and Professor of Finance at HEC Lausanne University. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Geneva.</style></custom2><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">53</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jeremy de Beer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vipal Jain</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inclusive Innovation in Biohacker Spaces: The Role of Systems and Networks</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">biohacker spaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">biohacking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">biotechnology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">inclusive innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">law</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">regulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social networks</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1137</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-37</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we examine the development of biohacker spaces and their impact on innovation systems through the lens of inclusive innovation. Examining issues associated with people, activities, outcomes, and governance, we observe that biohacker spaces offer an alternative approach to biotechnological research outside the orthodox walls of academia, industry, and government. We explain that harnessing the full innovative potential of these spaces depends on flexible legal and regulatory systems, including appropriate biosafety regulations and intellectual property policies and practices, and organic, community-based social and financial networking.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Ottawa
Jeremy de Beer is a Full Professor at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, Common Law Section, where he is a member of the Centre for Law, Technology, and Society. He is a Senior Research Associate at the IP Unit, University of Cape Town and a co-founding director of the Open African Innovation Research network, Open AIR. He is online at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.JeremydeBeer.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.JeremydeBeer.com&lt;/a&gt;.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Ottawa
Vipal Jain is a &lt;em&gt;Juris Doctor&lt;/em&gt; candidate (2018) at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, Common Law Section. She is a member of the Open African Innovation Research (Open AIR) network’s New and Emerging Researcher Group, focusing on intellectual property law issues in Canada and elsewhere. She holds a BSc from the University of Toronto, where she specialized in Genetics and Biotechnology.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Gedda</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Billy Nilsson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zebastian Såthén</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Klaus Solberg Søilen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Crowdfunding: Finding the Optimal Platform for Funders and Entrepreneurs</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding models</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding platforms</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">financing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">payout models</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/973</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31-40</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">As a steadily expanding source of venture capital, crowdfunding has become an alternative to traditional funding sources, such as banks and financial investors. The phenomenon of crowdfunding is represented by a growing number of Internet sites, here called crowdfunding platforms, devoted to the service. In this article, we investigate crowdfunding and their payout models, which are standard components on crowdfunding platforms. We consider the perspectives of both entrepreneurs and funders to determine the most attractive combination of models found on crowdfunding platforms. Our findings indicate that the most popular crowdfunding platforms, at the time of this study, reflect the preferences of entrepreneurs. The funders’ favoured crowdfunding model, which we call the equity model, is not currently found, in combination with the often-grouped, non-financial crowdfunding models of pre-order, sponsoring, or reward, on any of the top platforms. Thus, the research identifies a new market for crowdfunding platforms.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Halmstad University
David Gedda is a Master's student with a specialization in Marketing at Halmstad University, Sweden,. His research interests include crowdfunding platforms for entrepreneurs and corporate management success factors in a business-to-business context. Alongside his studies, he works in sales. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Halmstad University
Billy Nilsson is a Master's student with a specialization in Marketing at Halmstad University, Sweden, where he is currently writing his thesis on competitive intelligence on Web 2.0 platforms. He is also a touring musician in the band Strucky Likes, a partner in the record label VÅRØ, and a concert promoter at Tillsammans Sessions.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Halmstad University
Zebastian Såthén is a Master's student with a specialization in Marketing at Halmstad University, Sweden, where he is also studying to become a real estate agent. He currently works as a real estate assistant in his hometown of Smögen. </style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Halmstad University
Klaus Solberg Søilen is Professor of Management at Halmstad University, Sweden. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business&lt;/em&gt; (JISIB) and Senior Editor of the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Innovation Science&lt;/em&gt; (IJIS). He has published half a dozen books and more than thirty scientific articles on a wide area of management and marketing topics. </style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Insights (March 2016)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bootlegging</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">emerging markets</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">frugal innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patterns</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quintuple helix</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">underground innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">urban living lab</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/969</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Derek Smith</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leveraging Old Intellectual Property to Accelerate Technology Entrepreneurship</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">accelerated startup</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business models</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">copyright</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdfunding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">due diligence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneurs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">funding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intellectual property</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">old technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">product development clearance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">trademark</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/693</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21-27</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Acquiring or licensing assets to older technologies, including surviving intellectual property rights, is an often-overlooked viable strategy for accelerating technology entrepreneurship. This strategy can help entrepreneurs short-cut the growth of a customer base, reduce development effort, and shorten the time to market with a minimum viable product. However, this strategy is not without risk; entrepreneurs need to be careful that the acquired intellectual property rights are not fraught with issues that could severely outweigh any perceived value. Proper investigation is required to ensure success because the current literature fails to provide tools that an entrepreneur can apply when considering the acquisition of intellectual property. 

This article includes a case study of a technology company – Piranha Games – that indirectly acquired sole and exclusive access to a substantial historical customer base by acquiring and licensing older technology and surviving intellectual property assets. The founders then leveraged the existing product brand and its historical customers to acquire significant funding and went global with a minimum viable product in three years. The copyright and trademark assets provided value on day one to Piranha Games by making it difficult and risky for others to exploit the technology. Based on this case study, this article offers recommendations to entrepreneurs who may benefit from acquiring old intellectual property to accelerate the growth of their startups.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magneto Innovention Management
Derek Smith is the founder and principal of Magneto Innovention Management, an intellectual property consulting firm that assists entrepreneurs and small businesses to navigate and grow their international patent portfolios. He has over 20 years of experience working as an intellectual property management consultant and patent agent for IBM Canada, Bell Canada and, most recently, Husky Injection Molding Systems where he was Director, Global Intellectual Property. Prior to entering the field of intellectual property, he was an advisory engineer at IBM Canada where he was involved in a variety of leading-edge software development projects. Derek is currently a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He also holds a BEng degree in Systems and Computer Engineering from Carleton University and is a registered patent agent in both Canada and the United States.</style></custom1></record></records></xml>