<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul Woodfield</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Katharina Ruckstuhl</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rafaela C.C. Rabello</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Charting a Course of Action: An Insider-Outsider Approach</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethnography</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Innovation management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Insider-Outsider</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">narrative</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Participant-Observer</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reflexivity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sense-Making</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">timreview.ca/article/1456</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">48-66</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">We explore an alternative approach to action research that can be implemented throughout the lifespan of a science and technology research programme. We do this by examining the emergence and development of a participant-observer research approach where a researcher is also part of the same community of practice as those being observed in the technology and innovation management context. Our motivation stems from the need to understand innovation processes and management over a long period. Typically, consultants are employed for a given period to carry out action research. We present a case where social scientists, as opposed to action research consultants, carried out action research after a history of relationship building and becoming embedded within a longitudinal science and technology research programme. This allowed the social science researchers to build trust and rigor with those being observed before engaging an action research approach. We present our case as a narrative of experiences, events and turning points, reporting on what was observed and experienced by these social scientists. Our study extends current knowledge by mapping the research journey toward action research through three phases: navigation, iteration, and reflection phases. We argue that richer insights are generated when participant-observers engage early, and that their insights lead to action research that is more informed.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7/8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Auckland University of Technology
Dr. Paul Woodfield is a Senior Lecturer at Auckland University of Technology (AUT), Auckland, and holds a PhD from the University of Auckland. Building on his entrepreneurship and family business PhD research he received funding to investigate “Innovation in New Zealand’s Traditional Industries.” He is in the Department of International Business, Strategy, and Entrepreneurship at AUT and is also part of the “Building New Zealand's Innovation Capacity” spearhead for the National Science Challenge: Science for Technological Innovation. He has published in the areas of family business, entrepreneurship, wine business, methods, and science, technology, and innovation.   </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Otago
Dr. Katharina Ruckstuhl is an Associate Dean at the Otago Business School, University of Otago, New Zealand and holds a PhD from Otago. Dr. Ruckstuhl co-leads the “Building New Zealand’s Innovation Capacity” social science research of the National Science Challenge, Science for Technological Innovation. She is also the Vision Mātauranga (Māori knowledge) leader, a “Theme” that crosses all the Challenge’s research activities. She has published in the areas of Māori language, resource extraction in Māori territories, Māori entrepreneurship in SMEs, Indigenous science and technology, and Indigenous Knowledge.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Otago
Dr. Rafaela C.C. Rabello currently holds a PhD in social investment in the oil and gas sector and a Master’s in Education, awarded with distinction by the University of Otago, New Zealand. Rafaela also holds a B.A. in Psychology from Centro Universitário de Brasília - DF, Brazil. Rafaela has worked within the fields of corporate social responsibility - in the oil and gas sector - and education for more than 10 years. She has published in the areas of corporate social responsibility; social investment in the oil and gas sector, higher education and good teaching and effective learning methodologies in higher education.</style></custom3><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">48</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Malin Lindberg</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daniel Hallencreutz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Tengqvist</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bridging Participatory Policy Trends and Research Traditions through Social Innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-creation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social innovation</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1231</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-36</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This study explores whether social innovation may serve as a bridge between participatory policy trends and research traditions when striving for improved societal relevance and impact of research and innovation (R&amp;I). Despite their shared aim of relevance and impact through civic involvement, European R&amp;I policies and participatory action research approaches seldom refer to each other or harness each other’s resources. The study advances the knowledge regarding how the participatory elements in the policies and research approaches relate through a participatory case study of a joint R&amp;I process to develop a model for social innovation support in Sweden. The case study helps distinguish potential synergies between various degrees of involvement advocated in the policies and research approaches, as well as between the reliance on trending policy concepts vs. scientific notions of validity. Social innovation is perceived as a potential bridge between these elements, as it draws upon participatory academic traditions, while simultaneously tapping into current policy trends of co-creation, in the development of new approaches and solutions to societal challenges. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luleå University of Technology
Malin Lindberg is a Professor at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, where he specializes in participatory action research, in which knowledge is developed jointly by researchers and societal stakeholders. Her main topic of interest is inclusive forms of innovation and organization, with specific focus on social innovation, participatory innovation, and sustainable development. She has published several studies on policies, support, and management of inclusive innovation and organization in international anthologies and journals, for example, the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Innovation Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation,&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;European Public &amp; Social Innovation Review.&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WSP
Daniel Hallencreutz is a Senior Consultant for WSP in Sweden. He specializes in participatory processes of regional development with a scholarly base in human geography. His main topic of interest is mechanisms of growth and societal change in clusters and innovation systems in various industrial and geographical contexts. His PhD thesis scrutinized growth patterns in Swedish clusters of design-intensive and cultural-products industries, such as multimedia, fashion, and music. He has managed several participatory evaluation processes of regional and national clusters and innovation systems, for example, in the European Regional Development Fund.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WSP 
Anna Tengqvist is a Senior Consultant for WSP in Sweden. She specializes in participatory processes of social sustainability, equality management, and gender mainstreaming. One of her main topics of interest is social innovation development and support, and in this area she has managed several co-creative evaluations of multi-actor platforms and projects on regional level. She has also managed several participatory model development processes for gender equality, equal opportunities, intersectionality, and accessibility in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. This work includes the development of a European standard for gender mainstreaming in the European Social Fund.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magnus Hoppe</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Choosing an Outlet for Action Research: Publication Patterns in Innovation Journals</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bibliography</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">case study</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">journals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participative</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory action research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1234</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">66-77</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">With the aim to help innovation researchers choose outlets for articles based on participatory and action research methods, this article describes and discusses publication patterns of action research. A bibliographic study of 33 innovation journals ranked 4, 3, 2, and 1 in the 2018 Academic Journal Guide is complemented by a case study of this journal, the Technology Innovation Management Review, as an example of an established open access journal in the field with a wider scope and target group. From these two studies, we learn that the overall trend is towards more publications of action research articles in a diversity of outlets. Indirectly, the study supports the general view that articles striving towards adding practical relevance to research are becoming more frequent. There is no support for the notion that more renowned and higher-ranked journals would be more hesitant to accept articles with action research methods. The study also notes that there are interesting outlets beside those highly ranked and indexed in more conventional ways. The conclusion reached is that we lack a clear answer to the question of what are the best outlets for those of us who are interested in both innovation and action research. Instead, the study invites us to reflect upon what kind of impact we want to have and then act accordingly. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Magnus Hoppe is an Associate Professor at the School of Economics, Society and Engineering at Mälardalen University, Sweden. At the university, he is member of the Faculty Board, and leads processes for collaborative research in sustainable development. Magnus holds a PhD in Business Administration from Åbo Akademi University in Finland, where he presented his thesis on organized intelligence work in modern organizations. His current research concerns both private and public organizations and spans intelligence, entrepreneurship, and innovation. A special research interest lies in questioning dominating perspectives that bind our understanding of specific topics, and he now works to establish new ways of talking and thinking about innovation. His aim is to help organizations build new insights that will enhance their ideation processes and strategy building and, thereby, improve their innovative capabilities. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Matthias Guertler</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nathalie Sick</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anton Kriz</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Discipline-Spanning Overview of Action Research and Its Implications for Technology and Innovation Management</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bibliometrics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">discipline-spanning analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">literature review</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology and innovation management</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1233</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">48-65</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The iterative and learning character of action research is particularly beneficial for exploring complex socio-technical problems in technology and innovation management (TIM). In this respect, action research allows both rigorous and relevant research due to parallel solving of real-world problems, capability building, and gaining scientific insights. However, the use of action research within TIM research is surprisingly limited. Action research also is not a homogeneous research methodology since each research discipline, such as education and organizational science, has its own action research streams, which are often only loosely linked. A systematic overview of those action research traditions and specific best practices is still missing, which complicates a systematic transfer and use of action research in TIM. This article addresses this essential gap by building a cross-disciplinary overview of action research streams based on a bibliometric analysis using Scopus. The analysis includes relevant disciplines with action research traditions, their development over time, and the most influential journals, authors, institutions, and countries. Along with this discipline-spanning analysis, the article investigates particular TIM benefits and challenges of action research. The two key contributions of this article are: 1) a discipline-spanning overview of action research and its evolution and 2) an analysis of its implications for TIM research. These contributions build the basis for strengthening the use of action research in TIM. In the medium-term, action research has the capacity to link academia and industry more closely and, in doing so, assists important endeavours of translating more of our research outcomes into practice.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Technology Sydney
Matthias Guertler is a Lecturer in Engineering Design at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Australia. He holds several degrees in Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Design, and Innovation Management from the Technical University of Munich, Germany. Matthias’ transdisciplinary research is at the interface of engineering design and innovation management with a focus on managing open innovation. His action-research-based projects have been in close collaboration with various partners from industry and defense in Germany and Australia.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Technology Sydney
Nathalie Sick is a Senior Lecturer in Contemporary Technology Management in the Faculty of Engineering and IT at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Australia. Prior to joining UTS, she was a Young Research Group Leader with the Helmholtz Institute in Muenster, Germany, as well as a Junior Professor at the University of Muenster. She holds degrees in Management and Engineering as well as a PhD in Innovation Management. Her research revolves around innovation and technology management with a particular interest in discipline-spanning collaborations and industry convergence.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Australian National University
Anton Kriz is an Associate Professor at the Australian National University (ANU) specializing in the area of strategic innovation management and international marketing. His research focuses on advancing innovation management and innovation champions in enterprises, clusters, and regions through action research and action learning interventions. As part of the Research School of Management at ANU, he also teaches Innovation and New Venture Creation to executives at Tsinghua University in Beijing, China. </style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magnus Hoppe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erik Lindhult</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Action Research (April 2019)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participative</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1228</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-6</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Magnus Hoppe is an Associate Professor at the School of Economics, Society and Engineering at Mälardalen University, Sweden. At the university, he is member of the Faculty Board and leads processes for collaborative research in sustainable development. Magnus holds a PhD in Business Administration from Åbo Akademi University in Finland, where he presented his thesis on organized intelligence work in modern organizations. His current research concerns both private and public organizations and spans intelligence, entrepreneurship, and innovation. A special research interest lies in questioning dominating perspectives that bind our understanding of specific topics, and he now works to establish new ways of talking and thinking about innovation. His aim is to help organizations build new insights that will enhance their ideation processes and strategy building and, thereby, improve their innovative capabilities. </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Erik Lindhult (Ph.D.) is a Senior Lecturer in Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship at Mälardalen University in Sweden. He received his doctoral degree in Industrial Management from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, in the area of Scandinavian dialogue democratic approach to innovation and action research. His main area of research is participatory, collaborative, and democratic innovation and change management, as well as entrepreneurship for a sustainable development of society. His research interests also involve collaborative research methodologies, including action research and interactive research. He has been involved in a wide range of collaborative R&amp;D projects in the private, public, and cooperative sectors, in areas such as organizational development, incubator and science park development, service innovation, societal entrepreneurship, sustainable innovation, and school development. He is a board member of the Swedish Participatory Action Research Society (SPARC) and the Swedish Interactive Research Association (SIRA), as well as an expert advisor to the EU SWAFS Horizon 2020 research committee.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magnus Hoppe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erik Lindhult</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Action Research (May 2019)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participative</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1236</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-5</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Magnus Hoppe is an Associate Professor at the School of Economics, Society and Engineering at Mälardalen University, Sweden. At the university, he is member of the Faculty Board and leads processes for collaborative research in sustainable development. Magnus holds a PhD in Business Administration from Åbo Akademi University in Finland, where he presented his thesis on organized intelligence work in modern organizations. His current research concerns both private and public organizations and spans intelligence, entrepreneurship, and innovation. A special research interest lies in questioning dominating perspectives that bind our understanding of specific topics, and he now works to establish new ways of talking and thinking about innovation. His aim is to help organizations build new insights that will enhance their ideation processes and strategy building and, thereby, improve their innovative capabilities. </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Erik Lindhult (Ph.D.) is a Senior Lecturer in Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship at Mälardalen University in Sweden. He received his doctoral degree in Industrial Management from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, in the area of Scandinavian dialogue democratic approach to innovation and action research. His main area of research is participatory, collaborative, and democratic innovation and change management, as well as entrepreneurship for a sustainable development of society. His research interests also involve collaborative research methodologies, including action research and interactive research. He has been involved in a wide range of collaborative R&amp;D projects in the private, public, and cooperative sectors, in areas such as organizational development, incubator and science park development, service innovation, societal entrepreneurship, sustainable innovation, and school development. He is a board member of the Swedish Participatory Action Research Society (SPARC) and the Swedish Interactive Research Association (SIRA), as well as an expert advisor to the EU SWAFS Horizon 2020 research committee.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Insights (June 2019)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">development projects</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digitization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">management innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">women entrepreneurs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">women managers</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1244</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-3</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kristin Falk</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gerrit Muller</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Embedded Master’s Students Conduct Highly Relevant Research Using Industry as Their Laboratory</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">energy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">experimental learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">industrial knowledge</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">industry as laboratory</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge transfer</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">lessons learned</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">master project</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">master’s students</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">situated learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">systems engineering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">systems of systems</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1241</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">54-73</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article analyzes participatory action research conducted by Systems Engineering master’s students embedded fifty percent in industrial companies for three years. The resulting papers authored by these students identify challenges and effective practices suitable for knowledge transfer between industry and academia. The analysis covers 181 completed master’s projects, with a detailed analysis of 40 papers that have been published in international conferences and journals. The publication rate of about 23% shows that these students contribute actively to the body of Systems Engineering knowledge. This study analyzes master’s projects at three levels – industrial problem and drivers; Systems Engineering methods; and research method feasibility – and provides valuable lessons learned by applying the industry-as-laboratory approach. Embedding students in industry has resulted in publications that do not suffer from the main challenges of participatory research such as delays, repeatability, and only action and not research. These insights are valuable both for industry and for academia in future work to enhance innovations.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University College of Southeastern Norway
Kristin Falk is an Associate Professor at University College of Southeastern Norway, where she is responsible for the Systems Engineering Energy track, and fronting research on Systems Engineering. Kristin holds a PhD in Petroleum Production and a Master’s in Industrial Mathematics, both from Norwegian University of Science and Technology. She has worked within the oil and gas industry for 20 years, both with major subsea suppliers and with small startups. She has worked in various roles within engineering and management, cooperating well with multidisciplinary teams. She has successfully taken products from research through qualification and commercialization, and she has led R&amp;D projects both in industry and academia. Her current research focus is subsea architecture, safety, engineering communication, and innovation within the Systems Engineering framework. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University College of Southeastern Norway
Gerrit Muller, originally from the Netherlands, received his Master’s degree in Physics from the University of Amsterdam in 1979. He worked from 1980 until 1997 at Philips Medical Systems as a System Architect, followed by two years at ASML as Manager of Systems Engineering, returning to Philips (Research) in 1999. Since 2003, he has worked as Senior Research Fellow at the Embedded Systems Institute in Eindhoven, focusing on developing system architecture methods and the education of new system architects, receiving his doctorate in 2004. In January 2008, he became full Professor of Systems Engineering at University College of Southeast Norway in Kongsberg, Norway. He continues to work as a Senior Research Fellow at the Embedded Systems Innovations by TNO in Eindhoven in a part-time position.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Victoria Lakiza</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Isabelle Deschamps</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How to Develop an Impactful Action Research Program: Insights and Lessons from a Case Study</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">guiding principles</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Innovation management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research practice gap</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">success factors</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1239</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">34-43</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Action research holds great potential for helping bridge the gap between research and practice. By working closely together, researchers and practitioners can develop tangible customized solutions based on research findings. It becomes possible to go beyond generic best practices that might need adaptation for successful implementation and use, or that may not apply at all in some contexts. In this article, the mechanisms through which action research can create the desired change and impact in both industry and academia are illustrated by describing the relevance and contribution of the main steps of a longitudinal action research program in a Canadian manufacturing company. The authors share four guiding principles and six success factors that were revealed intuitively in the course of this multi-year research program. Their hope is to contribute to a better understanding of how it is possible to develop an adaptive action research methodology to increase the potential for research relevance and organizational change. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Polytechnique Montreal
Victoria Lakiza is a senior consultant, facilitator, and coach committed to unlocking the potential of people and organizations. She is passionate about change management, organizational transformation, and building bridges between different fields and perspectives. Victoria has a Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Polytechnique Montreal in Canada. Her action research Master’s project allowed her to deepen her knowledge and understanding of organizational change dynamics and of the role of performance measurement in promoting culture change while trying to bridge the gap between research and practice. Victoria’s professional experience includes supporting a culture shift towards intrapreneurship, developing a complete performance measurement system, and managing an organizational restructuring and re-branding in an innovative engineering consulting company. Concurrently, she was co-leading a volunteer initiative aiming to accelerate sustainable innovations in organizations through the development of intrapreneurial leaders. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Polytechnique Montreal
Isabelle Deschamps is a professional engineer, business manager, coach, and entrepreneur active in the areas of technology incubation, venture capital, intellectual property strategy, and hi-tech financing. In her 35-year career, she has been guiding innovation strategy and accompanying in both technological and organizational changes dozens of startups, SMEs, and R&amp;D groups in information technologies, new materials, 3D print, cleantech, and medical devices. Isabelle is a recognized professor and researcher at HEC Montreal, ÉTS, and Polytechnique Montreal in Canada. She is a speaker and expert in technology entrepreneurship, innovation and product management, science and technology policy and ecosystems, and SME financing. Isabelle advises Canadian industrial clusters, R&amp;D consortia, governmental agencies, and ecosystem members, such as the National Research Council Canada, Prima Quebec, Aero Montreal, and TechnoMontreal. She specializes in longitudinal and action research field studies, and she has published on the topics of technology implementation, innovation strategy and management, crisis management, open and collaborative innovation, industry research projects, and startup incubation. Isabelle is a metallurgist (Polytechnique Montreal) and holds an MBA (HEC Montreal) and a DBA (Harvard Business School) in Technology Management and Organizational Psychology.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Sannö</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Ericson Öberg</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erik Flores-Garcia</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mats Jackson</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Increasing the Impact of Industry–Academia Collaboration through Co-Production</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-production</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">impact</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">industry–academia collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">key factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">relevance</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rigour</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1232</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">37-47</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Increased competition and globalization motivate us to join forces to enhance the impact of the research conducted. Collaboration between organizations with different views can, however, be difficult to manage and needs awareness and skills to meet different expectations. This article will consider both a mutual industrial and academic perspective into the development of action research and, in six research project cases, empirically explore how the impact can be enhanced by considering certain key factors in the research process. How the phases of problem formulation, methodology, and results are managed is critical for the success of a collaboration and, thereby, its impact. Counter-productive forces that could dilute the progress over time need to be considered given that combining practical relevance and scientific rigour comes with challenges.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Volvo CE
Anna Sannö is the Research Strategy Manager at Volvo CE, previously working as a Senior Lecturer in External Collaboration at Örebro University in Sweden. Her research focus is on sustainable operations management. Anna received her PhD in Innovation and Design from Mälardalen University where she belonged to the research school Innofacture. Anna has an industrial background in surface treatment and the automotive industry. She holds a BSc in Chemical Engineering from Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Volvo CE
Anna Ericson Öberg is the Management System and Data Analysis Director at Volvo Construction Equipment and has been working with production, welding, and management since 2004. She has a PhD in Manufacturing Technology from Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. Her research interest lies in manufacturing improvements in the intersection between the research areas of quality, welding, and production and is managing and participating in several research projects. Anna holds an MSc in Manufacturing Management from Loughborough University in England and is Six Sigma Black Belt certified.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Erik Flores-Garcia is a doctoral student at Mälardalen University, Sweden. His research interests include discrete event simulation and decision-making. He holds an MSc in Production and Logistics from Mälardalen University and a BSc in Mechatronics from the Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education in Mexico.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jönköping University
Mats Jackson is Professor of Innovative Production at Jönköping University, Sweden and is the Programme Manager of SPARK, their research and education environment focusing on knowledge-intensive product realization. He was previously the Professor of Innovation and Product Realisation at Mälardalen University in Sweden and the Manufacturing Research Manager at Volvo Construction Equipment. He was also the Project Manager for the research school Innofacture at Mälardalen University. He received his PhD in 2000 in Production System Development at Linköping University and has a background as a production engineer and management consultant in industry.</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Katharina Ruckstuhl</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rafaela C. C. Rabello</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sally Davenport</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Navigating Boundaries in Additive Manufacturing through Action Research</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">critical orientation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SfTI</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">transformative praxis</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1229</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7-16</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Action research – both as praxis but also from a critical orientation – can elaborate modes of action, identifying the borders and margins that act as both the productive spaces for collaboration as well as the fuzzy areas that require reflection and clarification. In this exploratory case study, action research is used to follow an additive manufacturing project team in real time as it navigates fuzzy areas to integrate knowledge to produce commercializable science innovation in one of New Zealand’s National Science Challenges (NSC): Science for Technological Innovation – Kia Kotahi Mai: Te Ao Pūtaiao me Te Ao Hangarau (SfTI). Through action research as praxis and as critical orientation, we have identified key mechanisms in interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research for commercialization, particularly in the context of New Zealand’s indigenous Māori people. Our preliminary analysis indicates that an explicit understanding of the fuzzy spaces can help teams find creative and collaborative means to navigate the productive but challenging “interstices of disciplines” (Mengis et al., 2018) to produce science innovation and discoveries and to galvanize relationships with industry and Māori participants. The findings also indicate that action research can promote structural, relational, and knowledge changes within teams, helping them solve complex problems in real time. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Otago
Katharina Ruckstuhl is an Associate Dean at the Otago Business School, University of Otago, New Zealand. She also holds a PhD from Otago. Dr Ruckstuhl co-leads the “Building New Zealand’s Innovation Capacity” social science research of the National Science Challenge, Science for Technological Innovation. She is also the Vision Mātauranga (Māori knowledge) leader, a “Theme” that crosses all of the Challenge’s research activities. She has published in the areas of: Māori language; resource extraction in Māori territories; Māori entrepreneurship in SMEs; Indigenous science and technology; and Indigenous knowledge.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Otago
Rafaela C. C. Rabello holds a PhD in Social Investment in the oil and gas sector and a Master’s degree in Education, awarded with distinction by the University of Otago, New Zealand. Rafaela also holds a BA in Psychology from the University Center of Brasilia, Brazil. Rafaela has worked within the fields of corporate social responsibility – in the oil and gas sector – and education for more than 10 years. She has published in the areas of: corporate social responsibility; social investment in the oil and gas sector; higher education and good teaching and effective learning methodologies in higher education.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Victoria University of Wellington
Sally Davenport is a Professor of Management at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Sally is the Director of the New Zealand National Science Challenge “Science for Technological Innovation” (SfTI). Sally’s academic life began as a research chemist, but she now has research interests covering the commercialization of scientific research, entrepreneurship and the growth of high-tech firms, innovation strategy, and policy. Sally has previously led major research projects on competitive advantage in New Zealand firms, into organizations, and networks in biotechnology. Sally is a Commissioner with the New Zealand Productivity Commission and is also an Adjunct Professor in the College of Business and Economics at the Australian National University, a Fellow of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management, and a member of Global Women. In 2018, she was made a Member of the New Zealand Order of Merit for her services to science.</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bengt Wahlström</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q&amp;A. What Can Action Research Learn from Business Environment Analysis?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business environment analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">consultancy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">consultants</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">organizations</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1242</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">74-80</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Bengt Wahlström is a doctoral candidate at Mälardalen University in Sweden, where he holds a Licentiate of Philosophy degree. He is also a consultant and an author and has for decades been one of the leading experts in Scandinavia within innovation, business environment analysis, and future strategy. Every year, he meets with thousands of participants to hold discussions, seminars, and training programmes on these issues. His numerous books have sold over 60,000 copies, have won awards in Sweden and abroad, and have been translated into many languages. </style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erik Lindhult</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scientific Excellence in Participatory and Action Research: Part I. Rethinking Research Quality</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quality</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1237</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6-21</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A core impetus of participatory and action research is making science relevant and useful for solving pressing problems and improving social conditions, and enabling stakeholders to participate in research and development processes. There are claims in the community of participatory and action research of the potential for heightened scientific excellence, but at the same time, there are critiques in the mainstream community that more engaged, even activist, stances threaten scientific norms or that position these type of research approaches outside the field of science, for example, as issues of application. In the search of clarification of the scientific identity and the specific qualities of participatory and action research, scholars have been moving away from and sometimes have rejected traditional conceptions of quality. This leads to confusion about how to relate to the discourse on research quality and scientific excellence in mainstream science. Integration in this discourse is important in order to attain academic legitimation in prevailing institutions of science, for example, in applications for funding, in seeking to publish research, and in the acceptance of dissertations based on participatory and action research. The purpose of this article is to contribute to this integration by reconstructing the way traditional quality concepts – validity, reliability, and objectivity – can be fruitfully used in expanded frameworks for quality where scientific excellence of participatory and action approaches are visible and where mainstream science approaches also can be harboured. In this conceptual article, reconstruction of understanding of scientific inquiry is first made based on a praxis-oriented epistemology inspired by pragmatism. Through rethinking truth as trustworthiness, new proposals for the conceptualization and frames for research quality and scientific excellence are introduced. Second, a framework for understanding purpose in science and its basis in validity, reliability, and the core characteristics of participatory and action research is developed. Third, the turn to action, practice, and participation enables plural ways of knowing and ways that knowledge claims can be validated and made trustworthy. The article concludes that participatory and action research offers a broader landscape of purpose and validation than more traditional approaches to science. In a subsequent article, reliability and objectivity, and their use in participatory and action research, will be clarified.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Erik Lindhult (PhD) is a Senior Lecturer in Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship at Mälardalen University in Sweden. He received his doctoral degree in Industrial Management from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, in the area of Scandinavian dialogue democratic approach to innovation and action research. His main area of research is participatory, collaborative, and democratic innovation and change management, as well as entrepreneurship for a sustainable development of society. His research interests also involve collaborative research methodologies, including action research and interactive research. He has been involved in a wide range of collaborative R&amp;D projects in the private, public, and cooperative sectors, in areas such as organizational development, incubator and science park development, service innovation, societal entrepreneurship, sustainable innovation, and school development. He is a board member of the Swedish Participatory Action Research Society (SPARC) and the Swedish Interactive Research Association (SIRA), as well as an expert advisor to the EU SWAFS Horizon 2020 research committee.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erik Lindhult</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scientific Excellence in Participatory and Action Research: Part II. Rethinking Objectivity and Reliability</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">objectivity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reliability</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">05/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1238</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22-33</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The purpose of this article is to deal with the following question: Can the concepts of reliability and objectivity be reconceptualized and reappropriated to enable understanding of scientific excellence in participatory and action research? The article shows that it is fruitful to consider the “subjective” and active role of researchers as vital in enabling scientific objectivity and reliability. As an expansion from a replication logic, reliability can be conceptualized as adaptive, goal-seeking, dynamically regulated processes enabled by effective organization of interactive and participatory learning processes where all participants can contribute to learning and correction in inquiry. Instead of erasing subjectivity, objectivity can be enabled by critical subjectivity, intersubjectivity, practical wisdom, impartial norms of inquiry, and open democratic dialogue. Reliability and objectivity in this understanding can be enabled by participatory and action research through skilful performance of research practices such as reflective conversations between parties, dialogue conferences, experimentation, and experiential learning as part of action-research cycles, etc., which are common in participatory and action research initiatives and projects. By rethinking validity, reliability, and objectivity, recognizing the substantially more active and participatory stances enables scientific excellence, it can expand the repertoire of strategies for promoting research quality, and it helps to mainstream this type of approach in the scientific community.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Erik Lindhult (PhD) is a Senior Lecturer in Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship at Mälardalen University in Sweden. He received his doctoral degree in Industrial Management from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, in the area of Scandinavian dialogue democratic approach to innovation and action research. His main area of research is participatory, collaborative, and democratic innovation and change management, as well as entrepreneurship for a sustainable development of society. His research interests also involve collaborative research methodologies, including action research and interactive research. He has been involved in a wide range of collaborative R&amp;D projects in the private, public, and cooperative sectors, in areas such as organizational development, incubator and science park development, service innovation, societal entrepreneurship, sustainable innovation, and school development. He is a board member of the Swedish Participatory Action Research Society (SPARC) and the Swedish Interactive Research Association (SIRA), as well as an expert advisor to the EU SWAFS Horizon 2020 research committee.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Coghlan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erik Lindhult</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Status and Future of Action Research: An Interview with Professor David Coghlan</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Coghlan</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">insider action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interiority</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interview</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reflection</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1248</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">42-49</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trinity College
David Coghlan is Professor Emeritus at the Trinity Business School, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, and is a Fellow Emeritus of the College. He specializes in organization development and action research and participates actively in the both communities internationally. He has published over 180 articles and book chapters. Recent books include: &lt;em&gt;Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization &lt;/em&gt;(5th ed. Sage: London, 2019); &lt;em&gt;Conducting Action Research for Business and Management Students&lt;/em&gt; (with Rami Shani, Sage: London, 2018), &lt;em&gt;Inside Organizations&lt;/em&gt; (Sage: London, 2016). He is co-editor (with Mary Brydon-Miller) of the &lt;em&gt;SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research &lt;/em&gt;and (with Rami Shani) of the four-volume sets, &lt;em&gt;Fundamentals of Organization Development&lt;/em&gt; (Sage: London, 2010) and &lt;em&gt;Action Research in Business and Management&lt;/em&gt; (Sage: London, 2016). He is a member of the editorial advisory board of several journals, including &lt;em&gt;Action Research, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Action Learning: Research and Practice, Systemic Practice and Action Research,&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;OD Review&lt;/em&gt;.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mälardalen University
Erik Lindhult (PhD) is a Senior Lecturer in Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship at Mälardalen University in Sweden. He received his doctoral degree in Industrial Management from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, in the area of Scandinavian dialogue democratic approach to innovation and action research. His main area of research is participatory, collaborative, and democratic innovation and change management, as well as entrepreneurship for a sustainable development of society. His research interests also involve collaborative research methodologies, including action research and interactive research. He has been involved in a wide range of collaborative R&amp;D projects in the private, public, and cooperative sectors, in areas such as organizational development, incubator and science park development, service innovation, societal entrepreneurship, sustainable innovation, and school development. He is a board member of the Swedish Participatory Action Research Society (SPARC) and the Swedish Interactive Research Association (SIRA), as well as an expert advisor to the EU SWAFS Horizon 2020 research committee.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Armando Machevo Ussivane</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul Ellwood</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation Contexts</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">agricultural innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">boundaries</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">international collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology transfer</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1230</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17-26</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology transfer projects increasingly consist of multiple, diverse organizations, with each pursuing their own agenda as well as that of the overarching programme. In this article, we adopt a participatory action research methodology in order to explain and improve the coordination of the autonomous innovation activities within an organizationally complex project. The context of the research involved the transfer of rice production technology from China to Mozambique. The action research identified four categories of boundary within the project that were hindering performance: Intellectual/Land property rights; Public/Private sector logics; Inside/Outside programme; and Collaboration/Competition between programme actors. The process of co-inquiry with stakeholders enabled by the action research allowed programme actors to reach an understanding of others, and it created a new thinking space for mutual problem solving. By these means, the action research process makes a resource of the differences between stakeholders rather than it being seen as a barrier to be compromised through negotiation.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RBL
Armando Machevo Ussivane is the Chairman of RBL, E.P – a Mozambique Government agency in charge of the management of the Baixo Limpopo Irrigation Scheme. The objectives of this scheme are food security and poverty alleviation through improved agricultural productivity. His career includes 18 years of experience in the management of agriculture development projects. His research interests lie within the areas of inter-organizational collaboration including partnerships and technology transfer in cross-cultural agriculture contexts. Armando holds a Doctorate in Business Administration from the University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Liverpool
Paul Ellwood is a Senior Lecturer in Management at the University of Liverpool. His research interests are broadly in the area of science-led innovation and include technology transfer, responsible innovation, and the organization of university scientific research groups. His early career included leadership positions in a private science-based industry. Since moving to a university management school, he has become increasingly interested in issues relating to the engagement between academic research and management practice.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marius Imset</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Per Haavardtun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marius Stian Tannum</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">autonomous vessels</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">maritime</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quadruple helix</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">stakeholder analysis</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1203</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">26-39</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article explores how to conduct a cost-effective stakeholder analysis to investigate opportunities and interest in establishing a living lab for an autonomous ferry connection. Using an action research approach, we share our experiences with the process and results, and we reflect openly on the strengths and weaknesses of both the stakeholder methodology generally as well as our own implementation specifically. According to the cyclic nature of action research and experiential learning, the research was conducted in two iterations, with the second iteration drawing upon input from the first. We compare and discuss these two approaches in terms of costs and benefits from a practitioner’s perspective. The article provides a contribution to stakeholder analysis methodology for complex, multi-stakeholder innovation initiatives, such as living labs.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of South-Eastern Norway
Marius Imset is an Associate Professor in Product Design at the University of South-Eastern Norway. He has more than twenty years of experience in management of and participation in industrial and academic R&amp;D projects. His expertise is in product design, innovation management, and organizational change. In the maritime industry, he conducts research in the field of human factors with a special focus on cognitive situation assessment and decision making.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of South-Eastern Norway
Per Haavardtun is an Assistant Professor in the Maritime Institute of the University of South-Eastern Norway. He has expertise in maritime operations with respect to deck officers in accordance with the regulations of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). He also has expertise in cost accounting, business development, innovation, and entrepreneurship. He currently studies human factors in automated and autonomous maritime vessels. </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of South-Eastern Norway
Marius Tannum is an Assistant Professor in the field of Maritime Electronics and Automation at the University of South-Eastern Norway. He received his Master’s degree in Electrical Power Systems from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology with a focus on power electronics and control. Marius has more than 12 years of industry work experience with R&amp;D related to electrical power converters and as the Head of R&amp;D for a start-up company in the field of automation. His main interest is now maritime power and autonomous systems. </style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daniel Gentner</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Birgit Stelzer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bujar Ramosaj</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leo Brecht</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strategic Foresight of Future B2B Customer Opportunities through Machine Learning</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">B2B industries</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customer base analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customer foresight</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customer knowledge</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">customer profile</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">data mining</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">machine learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategic foresight</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1189</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-17</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Within the strategic foresight literature, customer foresight still shows a low capability level. In practice, especially in business-to-business (B2B) industries, analyzing an entire customer base in terms of future customer potential is often done manually. Therefore, we present a single case study based on a quantitative customer-foresight project conducted by a manufacturing company. Along with a common data mining process, we highlight the application of machine learning algorithms on an entire customer database that consists of customer and product-related data. The overall benefit of our research is threefold. The major result is a prioritization of 2,300 worldwide customers according to their predicted technical affinity and suitability for a new machine control sensor. Thus, the company gains market knowledge, which addresses management functions such as product management. Furthermore, we describe the necessary requirements and steps for practitioners who realize a customer-foresight project. Finally, we provide a detailed catalogue of measures suitable for sales in order to approach the identified high-potential customers according to their individual needs and behaviour. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ulm University
Daniel Gentner is a Junior Research Fellow at the Institute of Technology and Process Management at Ulm University in Germany. His research focuses on product management in B2B industries and especially on customer analytics methods and applications. Additionally, he works at iTOP.Partners GmbH as consultant and trainer for B2B product management, for example in the Center of Excellence in Global Product Management (CE ProMM). There, he supports the experience and knowledge transfer to practitioners on processes, techniques, roles, responsibilities, and tasks of product management in globally acting German and Swiss B2B companies. Daniel studied Business Administration at Ulm University and the University of Connecticut and holds a Master of Science degree from Ulm University. During his studies, he worked as a Student Research Assistant at Ulm University and as a student trainee in different companies (B2B and B2C). </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ulm University
Birgit Stelzer is a Senior Research Fellow of the Institute of Technology and Process Management at Ulm University in Germany, where she is also Head of the Department of Didactics. She has a diploma and a PhD in Management Science. She also works as a consultant and trainer for B2B companies on foresight topics, agile project management, and organizational transformation. Her research focuses mainly on foresight issues and business model innovation. She also lectures at several institutions in Europe, including the University of Antwerp and Steinbeis University Berlin.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ulm University
Bujar Ramosaj is a PhD Candidate at the Institute of Technology and Process Management at Ulm University in Germany, where he holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration with a focus on Technology Management. His research focuses on the financial evaluation of emerging technologies and the assessment of their potential to gain greater value in technology-related M&amp;A activities. In addition, he works for ITOP.Partners GmbH as a technology management consultant, where he identifies, analyzes, and evaluates technologies and technology strategies.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Liechtenstein
Leo Brecht is a Full Professor of Entrepreneurship and Technology at the University of Liechtenstein, where he researches in innovation, technology, and product management, mainly based on analytics. He joined the University of Liechtenstein in October 2018; previously, he was a Professor at Ulm University, Germany. Leo is the author of several books and the founder of two start-up companies.</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sara Logghe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Action Research as a Framework to Evaluate the Operations of a Living Lab</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">panel management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">user research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1056</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">35-41</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we propose an action research approach to capture and act upon the delights and frustrations of panel members who participate in living lab research in order to optimize the operations of the living lab itself. We used this approach to test the effectiveness of action research in providing guidelines to practitioners to evaluate and design effective and sustainable user involvement processes in living labs. We conducted a focused literature review and an in-depth case study of both the integration of a researcher within the community and the implementation of an action research project within an existing living lab. This living lab is regarded as both a forerunner and a best-practice example in Europe. Based on our findings, we recommend co-creating the “operations” of a living lab with the users themselves following a combined action research and living lab approach.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec – MICT – Ghent University
Sara Logghe is a Living Lab Researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. She holds master’s degrees in History and Communication Sciences from Ghent University, and her research interests include the potential of social media for cultural institutions, the changing library landscape, and living labs. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec – MICT – Ghent University
Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead in User Research at imec.livinglabs and a Senior Researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. Dimitri is responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of these living lab projects and coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. His PhD thesis was entitled &lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation.&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Seppo Leminen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mika Westerlund</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimitri Schuurman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pieter Ballon</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (February 2017)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business-to-business</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">emotions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">needsfinding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">operations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reflection</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1052</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-6</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laurea University of Applied Sciences
Seppo Leminen is a Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences and serves as an Adjunct Professor of Business Development at Aalto University in Finland and an Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University in Canada. He holds a doctoral degree in Marketing from the Hanken School of Economics and a doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering and Management in the School of Science at Aalto University. His research and consulting interests include living labs, open innovation, innovation ecosystems, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), as well as management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. Results from his research have been reported in &lt;em&gt;Industrial Marketing Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Business &amp; Industrial Marketing, Management Decision, &lt;/em&gt;the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Technology Management,&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Technology Marketing, &lt;/em&gt;the &lt;em&gt;International Journal of Product Development,&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review,&lt;/em&gt; among many others.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Mika Westerlund, DSc (Econ), is an Associate Professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics in Finland. His current research interests include open and user innovation, the Internet of Things, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead in User Research at imec.livinglabs and a Senior Researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. Dimitri is responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of these living lab projects and coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. His PhD thesis was entitled &lt;em&gt;Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation.&lt;/em&gt;</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">imec.livinglabs
Pieter Ballon is the Academic Lead of imec.livinglabs, the International Secretary of the European Network of Living Labs, and Director of the research group imec-SMIT at Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. He specializes in business modelling, open innovation, and the mobile telecommunications industry. Formerly, he was Senior Consultant and Team Leader at TNO. In 2006–2007, he was the coordinator of the cross issue on business models of the Wireless World Initiative (WWI), which united five integrated projects in the European Union's 6th Framework Programme. Pieter holds a PhD in Communication Sciences from Vrije Universiteit Brussel and a MA in Modern History from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.</style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anna Ståhlbröst</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marita Holst</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reflecting on Actions in Living Lab Research</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Apollon</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">context</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">digital innovations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">end users</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation process</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research process</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1055</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-34</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living labs deploy contemporary open and user-centred engagement processes in real-world contexts where all relevant stakeholders are involved and engaged with the endeavour to create and experiment with different innovations. The approach is evidently successful and builds on the perspective that people have a democratic right to have influence over changes that might affect them, such as those brought about by an innovation. In this article, we will reflect on and discuss a case in which end users took part in the development of a method that stimulates learning and adoption of digital innovations in their own homes while testing and interacting with it. The results show that, when end users were stimulated to use the implemented innovation through different explicit assignments, they both increased their understanding of the situation as well as changed their behaviour. Living lab processes are complex and dynamic, and we find that it is essential that a living lab have the capability to adjust its roles and actions. We argue that being reflective is beneficial for innovation process managers in living labs because it allows them to adjust processes in response to dynamic circumstances. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luleå University of Technology
Anna Ståhlbröst is an Associate Professor in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. Her research is focused on the phenomena of living labs and open, user-driven innovation processes, with special interest in end-user needs and motivations. Anna's research is related to different application areas such as smart cities, domestic IT use, and online privacy. She has participated in several international and national innovation and research projects, and she is currently involved in both the Privacy Flag project and the U4IoT project financed by the European Commission.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Luleå University of Technology
Marita Holst is Senior Project Manager at the Centre for Distance-Spanning Technology and General Manager of Botnia Living Lab at Luleå University of Technology in Sweden. Marita’s research interests include methods and tools for creating collaborative working environments for innovative and boundary-crossing working groups and applied ongoing research and innovation projects such as OrganiCity, Privacy Flag, and U4IoT, in which she currently participates.</style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anton Kriz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Courtney Molloy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alexandra Kriz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sabrina Sonntag</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">All Australian Regions Are Not Born Equal: Understanding the Regional Innovation Management Sandpit</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">constructed advantage</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">phronesis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pivot</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quadruple helix</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">regional innovation management sandpit</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RIS3</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">smart specialization</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategic management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">triple helix</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/993</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11-23</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, we highlight and challenge an overly simplistic assessment of regions and regional innovation systems in Australia. Treating each region and place as equal and prescribing blanket policy is anathema to the reality. Having argued that places are not equivalent, we then move on to highlight that commonalities at a deeper institutional level are possible. We draw on fieldwork and ongoing action research from the Australian regions of Hunter and Central Coast (New South Wales) and Northern Tasmania. Results of the theory and case work have been instrumental in the development of 11 structural attributes of a regional innovation management (RIM) sandpit framework. The framework provides attributes but also important process insights related to regional programs, enterprise development, and project innovations. Although developing from the Australian context, we expect that the RIM Sandpit and its place-based insights can be generalized to other regions around the world.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Newcastle
Anton Kriz is Senior Lecturer at the University of Newcastle, Australia, where he is a specialist in innovation management and strategy. He has an extensive background in business, industry, government, and academia. He has been a CEO, a management consultant, and while working in Government, has secured international joint ventures as well as conducted major research and development projects in Australia and overseas. Anton has had over 20 years research experience in Asia working with key markets such as Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Korea. Because of his understanding of doing business in China, Anton has also worked on projects such as Tourism Australia’s 2020 China Strategy. He is known for his ability to boundary span between government, university, and industry. Anton's other expertise is in enterprise-specific innovation management in areas such as mining services, manufacturing, agribusiness, and sport. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Newcastle
Courtney McGregor is a PhD Candidate at the University of Newcastle, Australia, where she is investigating individual innovative champion behaviour in the public and not-for-profit sectors. Courtney worked for IBM’s Global Business Services where she recruited new talent for Application Innovation Services and Application Management Services. This role provided a sound basis for her move into Workforce Management, which involved managing the allocation of resources across several business units to support consulting projects.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Sydney
Alexandra Kriz completed a Bachelor of Economics (Honours) at the University of Sydney, Australia, where she also recently completed her PhD in the early growth of firms related to innovation in spin-outs. She has been a visiting researcher at the Turku School of Economics (University of Turku, Finland) and the Adam Smith Business School (University of Glasgow, Scotland). Alexandra's Honours thesis explored ambidexterity and the ability to undertake both radical and incremental innovation.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Newcastle
Sabrina Sonntag is a PhD Candidate at the University of Newcastle, Australia, where she is investigating the potential for building Mittelstand and hidden champion capabilities in the Australian manufacturing sector. Sabrina has studied in England where she completed her Honours degree. She has been involved in Federal Government projects including looking at improving the performance of regional SMEs and networks through improved government engagement. </style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chris McPhee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Guimont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dominic Lapointe</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial: Innovation in Tourism (November 2016)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">boundary objects</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-creation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdsourcing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">smart cities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">smart destinations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tourism</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1029</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-5</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review
Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the &lt;em&gt;Technology Innovation Management Review&lt;/em&gt;. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living Lab in Open Innovation (LLio)
David Guimont is a Teacher-Researcher at the Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup in Quebec, Canada, where he is associated with the Recreation and Leadership Training Department and the Living Lab in Open Innovation (LLio). He holds a master’s degree in Tourism Management and Development from the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM).</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)
Dominic Lapointe is a Professor in the Department of Urban Studies and Tourism at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) in Canada, where he is the Director of the Tourism and Hospitality Management Undergraduate program. His research addresses development and environmental issues with the use of critical theory, especially in the fields of tourism, conservation, and the environment. He holds a doctoral degree in Regional Development from the Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR).</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Guimont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dominic Lapointe</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Empowering Local Tourism Providers to Innovate through a Living Lab Process: Does Scale Matter?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">action research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">destination management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">level</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scale</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">socio-territorial action</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">territoriality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">tourism</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1031</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18-25</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A destination management organization looking to integrate technology into its tourism offering tasked a living lab with engaging tourists and tourism providers in the process. At the end of the two-year initial funding period for an action research project, the process is a success and stakeholders are engaged in the innovation ecosystem. But what is next? By observing participants and gathering feedback from stakeholders through a Policy Delphi panel, the outcomes of the project and the intentions and actions of the tourism providers and other parties were identified. Innovation capacity has increased: spin-offs were created and stakeholders have embraced open and collaborative innovation. Now, stakeholders are determined to make the process sustainable by finding other funding sources. But what should be the level of cooperation and intervention? What level can best foster innovation and knowledge retention? A case study combining a grid of characteristics and levels of analysis for living labs was used to identify one key question: for a living lab in tourism, does scale matter? This article will explore that question and will contribute to the understanding of the living lab as a model of socio-territorial action.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living Lab in Open Innovation (LLio)
David Guimont is a Teacher-Researcher at the Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup in Quebec, Canada, where he is associated with the Recreation and Leadership Training Department and the Living Lab in Open Innovation (LLio). He holds a master’s degree in Tourism Management and Development from the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM).</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) 
Dominic Lapointe is a Professor in the Department of Urban Studies and Tourism at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) in Canada, where he is the Director of the Tourism and Hospitality Management Undergraduate program. His research addresses development and environmental issues with the use of critical theory, especially in the fields of tourism, conservation, and the environment. He holds a doctoral degree in Regional Development from the Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR).</style></custom2></record></records></xml>