%0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Demystifiying the Meaning of Transnational Entrepreneurship: Indian transnational entrepreneurs in comparative perspective %A Supriya Singh %A Punit Saurabh %A Nityesh Bhatt %K diaspora %K entrepreneurship %K immigrant %K migration %K transnational %X Migration of people from one geographical location to another, within or outside a country, has a major role to play in the socio-economic development across the globe. "Migrants" and "immigrants" that showcase entrepreneurial traits and are valued in both home and host countries. Transnational entrepreneurs are often studied in various cross-national entrepreneurial research streams, like international entrepreneurship, immigrant entrepreneurship, thus causing ambiguity in the existing definitions. This paper contributes a specific definition of "transnational entrepreneurship", based on secondary research, which takes into account different mobility types. It emphasizes the importance of this construct for developing transnational entrepreneurial typologies. The authors propose a "framework of transnational entrepreneurship" in the paper. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 47-59 %8 11/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1403 %N 11 %1 Nirma University Supriya Singh is a Doctoral Scholar from the Institute of Management, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India. The broad research topic she currently works on is entrepreneurship, innovation and the role of transnational migrants. %2 Nirma University Dr. Punit Saurabh is presently serving Nirma University with the Institute of Management and specializes in entrepreneurship, innovation, family business, venture ecosystems, International relations, and geostrategic studies. He holds a doctorate in Management from the Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur, and frequently contributes articles to key journals and newspapers. %3 Nirma University Dr. Nityesh Bhatt is a Professor and Chair of Information Management Area at the Institute of Management, Nirma University, India. He has more than 20 years of experience in academia. His research areas include e-Governance, E-Commerce, ERP, and IT strategy. %& 47 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1403 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Editorial: Insights (June 2020) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K Bitcoin %K blockchain %K crowdfunding %K crypto assets %K cryptocurrencies %K developing countries. %K distributed ledger technology %K Employeedriven innovation %K entrepreneurial finance %K entrepreneurship %K Ethereum %K Financial industry %K FinTech %K ICOs %K IEO %K innovation %K intellectual property rights %K internationalization %K IT industry %K job autonomy %K mining industry %K moral hazard %K need for autonomy %K new company %K Porter's Five Forces framework %K regulation %K scaling company value %K scaling-up %K self-leadership %K signaling %K SME %K STO %K sustainability %K technological environment %K technology %K technology readiness %K token offering %K token sales %K tokenization %K value proposition %K value proposition alignment %K venture capital %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 3-4 %8 06/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1363 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the TIM Review. He is a former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University (2012-2017), and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University (2016-2017) in Vilnius, Lithuania. He completed a PhD from the Faculty of Sociology at St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science (2010). He was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council (2013-2015), for which he conducted research visits to the Copernican Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (Krakow), the University of Edinburgh's Extended Knowledge Project, Cambridge University's History and Philosophy of Science Department, and Virginia State University's Science and Technology Studies program, as well as previously at the Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems (2010-2011). He was affiliated with the Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking, leading student and faculty language and communications workshops, most recently (2013, 2014, 2017) in Yangon, Myanmar. He is a promoter and builder of blockchain distributed ledger technology systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1363 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T Editorial: Insights (November 2020) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K AI innovation and maturity %K and diaspora entrepreneurs. %K artificial intelligence %K confidential information %K criminal law %K digitally enhanced teamwork %K economic espionage %K entrepreneurship %K health technology %K immigrants %K Innovation management %K living labs %K migration %K Multidisciplinarity %K situated practice %K small and medium-sized enterprises %K stakeholder participation %K sustainability %K trade secrets %K transnationals %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 3-4 %8 11/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1404 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Stoyan has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the TIM Review. He is a former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University (2012-2017), and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University (2016-2017) in Vilnius, Lithuania. His PhD is from St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He interned at the S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, St. Petersburg, sector on Sociology of Science (2010). He was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council (2013-2015), for which he conducted research visits to the Copernican Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (Krakow), the University of Edinburgh's Extended Knowledge Project, Cambridge University's History and Philosophy of Science Department, and Virginia State University's Science and Technology Studies program, as well as previously at the Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems (2010-2011). He worked for the Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking, leading student and faculty language and communications workshops, most recently (2013, 2014, 2017) in Yangon, Myanmar. His current research interests are distributed ledger technology (blockchain) systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1404 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2020 %T A Two-Staged Approach to Technology Entrepreneurship: Differential Effects of Intellectual Property Rights %A Saurav Pathak %A Etayankara Muralidharan %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K intellectual property rights %K technology %X In this article we examine how the strength of the intellectual property rights (IPR) regime drives technology entrepreneurship innovation (TEI) that comprise novel unfamiliar technological products and new business models, which in turn lead to new product-market combinations. We consider TEI to be a two-stage process that involves access and use of new technologies and technological resources by entrepreneurs. While stronger IPR may constrain easy availability of new technologies and technological resources for entrepreneurs, use of these leads to TEI. We suggest that stronger IPR regimes could lead to TEI and its positive effect is felt through easy accessibility of the latest technologies and technology resources by entrepreneurs. Our model contributes to the understanding of the effect of strong IPR regimes on the different stages of the innovation process. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 10 %P 5-13 %8 06/2020 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1364 %N 6 %1 Xavier University Saurav Pathak, is an associate professor of innovation and entrepreneurship in the Williams College of Business at Xavier University. Pathak received his first Ph.D., in mechanical engineering from the University of Florida (2007) and another in entrepreneurship from the Imperial College Business School, London (2011). After his doctorate from University of Florida in 2007, he returned to India and was part of a tech-start-up named Zeus Numerix Private Limited that was incubated in the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai. There he held the position of Lead Scientist and was instrumental in developing simulation software for India’s aviation industry and commercial nuclear power plants. He also holds a master’s in mechanical engineering (ME) degree from Ohio University (2003) and a Bachelor in ME from Birla Institute of Technology, India (2001). Dr. Pathak’s research revolves around cross-country comparative entrepreneurship and focuses on examining the influences of higher-order contextual factors on individual-level entrepreneurial behaviors. Recently, he has started looking into how culture-specific emotional intelligence, including perceived well-being, shapes such behaviors differently across cultures. His ongoing research projects also include predicting entrepreneurial coping strategies and self-control based on entrepreneur’s level of emotional intelligence. %2 MacEwan University Etayankara Muralidharan is an Associate Professor of Management at MacEwan University, Canada. He received his PhD in 2013 from the University of Manitoba in Canada. His research interests are in organizational crisis management and entrepreneurship. His research has been recently published in Journal Business Ethics, Business & Society, Sustainability, Cross-Cultural Management, Journal of Small Business Management, International Business Review, Thunderbird International Business Review, Management Research Review, International Journal of Innovation & Technology Management, Current Topics in Management, and has been presented at and appeared in the proceedings of the Academy of Management, Academy of International Business, Babson Entrepreneurship Conference (BCERC) and the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada. %& 5 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1364 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Insights (July 2019) %A Chris McPhee %K accelerators %K adoption %K Africa %K architecture %K business ecosystems %K business models %K design %K digital payments %K entrepreneurship %K incubators %K Innovation management %K ISPIM %K knowledge management %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-4 %8 07/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1250 %N 7 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1250 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Insights (November 2019) %A Stoyan Tanev %A Gregory Sandstrom %K artificial intelligence %K competitive advantage %K cybersecurity %K deep learning %K Deepfake %K design rules %K digitalization %K entrepreneurial ecosystems %K entrepreneurial university %K entrepreneurship %K entrepreneurship education %K fake news %K innovation %K international entrepreneurship %K leadership %K Learning Capabilities %K marketing %K motivation %K new venture teams %K quadruple helix %K sanctions %K SMEs %K teamwork %K triple helix %K university business incubation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-4 %8 11/2019 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1278 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada) and PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria).
Dr. Stoyan Tanev has published multiple articles in several research domains. His current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology start-ups, business analytics, topic modeling and text mining. He has also an interest in interdisciplinary issues on the interface of the natural and social sciences. %2 Technology Innovation Management Review Gregory Sandstrom is Managing Editor of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Former Associate Professor of Mass Media and Communications at the European Humanities University and Affiliated Associate Professor at the Social Innovations Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University in Vilnius, Lithuania. PhD from St. Petersburg State University and the Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sector on Sociology of Science. Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Lithuanian Science Council and Autonomous National University of Mexico's Institute for Applied Mathematics and Systems. Promoter and builder of blockchain distributed ledger technology systems and digital extension services. %& 3 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1278 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Editorial: Technology Commercialization and Entrepreneurship (January 2019) %A Chris McPhee %A Ferran Giones %A Dev K. Dutta %K commercialization %K digitalization %K e-leadership %K entrepreneurship %K framework %K innovation %K internationalization %K legitimacy %K management %K SMEs %K startups %K technology %K technology intensity %K ventures %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 3-8 %8 01/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1207 %N 1 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 University of Southern Denmark Ferran Giones is an Assistant Professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Sønderborg. He received his PhD from La Salle – Ramon Llull University in Barcelona, Spain. His research field is technology entrepreneurship, where he explores how and when technological progress transforms into entrepreneurial activity, and how this entrepreneurial activity results in sustainable organizations and innovative ecosystems. %3 University of New Hampshire Dev K. Dutta is an Associate Professor of Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship in the Management Department at the University of New Hampshire in the United States. His research and teaching focus on the intersection of entrepreneurship and innovation, especially the way these concepts apply at the firm and ecosystem levels. Dev has over 25 research publications in his field in peer-reviewed journals as well as books, book chapters, and research monographs. He also holds national certifications as an academic coach and facilitator in technology entrepreneurship, innovator mindset, lean launch pad, and design thinking (MIT and Stanford D-School). Before joining academia, Dev worked for 15 years as a corporate strategy consultant for several large Indian IT multinationals. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1207 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T The Strategies of Technology Startups Within and Between Business Ecosystems %A Taina Tukiainen %A Thommie Burström %A Martin Lindell %K boundaries %K business ecosystems %K entrepreneurship %K startups %K strategy %X Technology startups build strategies in order to survive within the framework of business ecosystems. However, the knowledge required to make such strategies effective is scarce. This article poses the question: “How do small technology startups strategize within and between business ecosystems?” Based on an explorative qualitative study, this article defines and presents a dynamic strategic framework of three strategies employed by technology startups. Some startups choose to act within one defined business ecosystem, most startups use a multi-ecosystem strategy to act between and draw benefits from many business ecosystems, and the rest act as ecosystem creators that challenge the logics of existing ecosystems. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 25-41 %8 06/2019 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1247 %N 6 %1 Aalto University Taina Tukiainen is Professor of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation at Aalto University in Finland. She is also a Cabinet Member of the First Vice President of the EU Committee of the Regions. She has worked for over 10 years at Nokia Corporation and over 15 years globally in universities. Her research interests are entrepreneurship, innovation, strategy, and technology management. Her doctoral dissertation is titled The Unexpected Benefits of Internal Corporate Ventures: An Empirical Examination of the Consequences of Investment in Corporate Ventures (2004), and her latest related books are The Finnish Startups in Globally Evolving Ecosystems: Value for Finland (2014) and The Regional Innovation Ecosystems (2016). She has published in Organization Science and MIT Sloan Management Review and has a wide international network. %2 Hanken School of Economics Thommie Burström is Rettig Capital Assistant Professor of Management and Organisation at Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland. His academic interests are in projects, entrepreneurship, business ecosystems, and platform management. Thommie has published papers in, for example, the International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. %3 Hanken School of Economics Martin Lindell is Professor Emeritus in Entrepreneurship and Management at Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland. His research interests are in entrepreneurship, creativity, innovation, strategy, and leadership. He has published in many international journals including, among others, Leadership Quarterly, Scandinavian Journal of Management, International Strategic Management and Organization, Journal of Small Business Management, and European Management Journal. He has a wide international network and has been an active member in several international research projects. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1247 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2019 %T Working with Startups? These are the Three Things You Ought to Know about Startup Teams %A Anna Brattström %K entrepreneurship %K new venture teams %K teamwork %X While much has been written about how startups work to develop their product, this paper focuses instead on how to manage the startup team. Based on a systematic review of current research, I present actionable insights about startup team characteristics; who they are, how they work, and how they stay together. I explain how these characteristics imply both opportunities and threats for the viability of the team and discuss how startup teams can be managed to increase the likelihood of their survival and growth. Given that the majority of startup failures are attributed to the team, not to the product, these insights are valuable both to aspiring entrepreneurs and to their external stakeholders. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 9 %P 5-14 %8 11/2019 %G eng %U timreview.ca/article/1279 %N 11 %1
Lund University

Anna Brattström works at Lund University, Sweden. Her research focuses on how people come together and work together in contexts such as innovative start-ups or inter-organizational R&D alliances. Her work has been published in journals such as the Academy of Management Journal, Organization Studies, Research Policy, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice and Journal of Product Innovation Management.

 

%& 5 %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1279 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in India (January 2018) %A Chris McPhee %A Punit Saurabh %K emerging markets %K entrepreneurship %K India %K innovation %K rural %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-4 %8 01/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1128 %N 1 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Nirma University Punit Saurabh is an Assistant Professor of Strategic Management & Entrepreneurship at Nirma University’s Institute of Management in Ahmedabad, India. Previously, he was a senior faculty member at the International Centre for Entrepreneurship and Career Development (ICECD) in Ahmedabad, India. Punit received his PhD from the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India, in the domain of innovation and entrepreneurship development. He has hands-on experience in managing government innovation and entrepreneurship funding programs and is also involved with the academic aspects of entrepreneurship. His research interests include innovation management and entrepreneurship development, and he has varied experience in product funding and commercialization. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1128 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Insights (June 2018) %A Chris McPhee %K 3D printing %K additive manufacturing %K Amazon %K boundary spanning %K business models %K civic innovation %K culture %K entrepreneurship %K innovation integrators %K knowledge transfer %K living labs %K sociotechnical systems %K startup %K university–industry collaboration %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-4 %8 06/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1160 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1160 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Editorial: Insights (May 2018) %A Chris McPhee %K business models %K co-creation %K drop out %K entrepreneurship %K facilitation %K innovation %K internationalization %K lean global startups %K living labs %K services %K servitization %K stakeholders %K users %K value propositions %K value-in-use %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 3-4 %8 05/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1154 %N 5 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1154 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Q&A. What Barriers Do Women Face in Becoming High-Tech Entrepreneurs in Rural India? %A Rituparna Basu %A Sarada Chatterjee %K barriers %K challenges %K entrepreneurship %K India %K rural %K technology %K women %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 33-36 %8 01/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1132 %N 1 %1 International Management Institute, Kolkata Rituparna Basu is an Assistant Professor in Marketing, Retail and Entrepreneurship at the International Management Institute in Kolkata, India. Dr. Basu won the Global ISB-Ivey Case Competition 2017 and received the prestigious AIMS-IRMA Outstanding Young Woman Management Teacher Award 2016. She earned her Doctor of Philosophy in Management from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur in 2013. She holds a BSc in Economics from St. Xaviers’ College in Kolkata, and she is a gold medallist MBA. She is particularly known for her practice-led research and is also regarded as a high-impact corporate trainer. %2 International Management Institute, Kolkata Sarada Chatterjee is a Teaching Assistant at the International Management Institute in Kolkata, India. She holds a BCom (Hons) from the University of Calcutta, India, and an MCom from University of Burdwan, India. She received the Active Young Researcher Award in 2017 from the AR Research Publication and Conference World. Previously, she was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Business Administration at Bhawanipur Education Society College in Calcutta and a Lecturer in the Department of Business Administration at the Scottish Church College, also in Calcutta. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1132 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Technology Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets: An Exploration of Entrepreneurial Models Prevalent in India %A Shiv S Tripathi %A Mita Brahma %K emerging markets %K entrepreneurship %K India %K models %K technology %K typology %X Are the features and processes of entrepreneurship – such as wealth creation, risk taking, vision, identification of a niche market, launching new products, and so on – common across the world? Many would assume they would be. However, firms that are entrepreneurial in nature and belong to emerging markets may or may not follow the established models of developed economies. In this study, we sought to explore various types of entrepreneurial models that are prevalent in an emerging market. For this purpose, we collected primary and secondary data to identify characteristics of technology-based entrepreneurial firms in India. Based on the two dimensions of degree of demand/supply and expected loss/risk, we identify four models of entrepreneurship – incremental, proactive, radical, and reactive – and illustrate each model with examples from Indian companies. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 24-32 %8 01/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1131 %N 1 %1 Management Development Institute, Gurgaon Shiv S Tripathi is an Assistant Professor in the area of Strategic Management at the Management Development Institute in Gurgaon, India. He holds a PhD degree from the Vinod Gupta School of Management at the Indian Institute of Technology in Kharagpur. He has published papers in the area of product and service innovations, growth strategies, and innovations in large organizations. He has co-authored a book titled International Business along with a number of case studies. He is a member of the Strategic Management Society, the International Society for Professional Innovation Management, the Academy of Management, and the Academy of International Business. His current research interests include corporate entrepreneurship, open innovation, ambidexterity, and innovation in large organizations. %2 Management Development Institute, Gurgaon Mita Brahma is a Fellow Program Scholar in the area of Strategic Management at the Management Development Institute in Gurgaon, India. She holds MS and MBA degrees from the Indian Institute of Technology in Delhi, India. Her research interests include corporate entrepreneurship, innovation, and strategic human resources management. She has over thirty years of experience in the banking, software, and education sectors. She currently leads a niche-consulting firm that helps organizations improve their performance through increased operational efficiency and strategic and human resource initiatives. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1131 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Transnational Entrepreneurship: Distinctive Features and a New Definition %A Eduardo Bailetti %K cross-border %K definition %K entrepreneurship %K features %K topic modelling %K transnational %X Definitions of transnational entrepreneurship are too general making it difficult to understand what distinguishes transnational entrepreneurship from other forms of entrepreneurship. In addition, these definitions identify the “immigrant”, “ethnic”, or “migrant” entrepreneur as the focal actor rather than the company. This makes it difficult to align transnational entrepreneurship with the theory of the firm and provide practical insights to practitioners. This article examines 11 definitions of transnational entrepreneurship, discovers the groups of words that best represent the information in a corpus comprised of 44 journal articles, identifies the key features that distinguish transnational entrepreneurship from other forms of entrepreneurship, and advances a new definition of transnational entrepreneurship. The results indicate that transnational entrepreneurship has two key distinctive features: cross-border investment logic and institutional distance – the difference in institutional context between countries. Accordingly, transnational entrepreneurship may be usefully defined as “a cross-border investment to acquire, combine, and recombine specialized individuals and heterogeneous assets to create and capture value for the company under conditions of institutional distance and uncertainty”. This proposed definition builds on the features that make transnational entrepreneurship distinctive, is consistent with the theory of the firm, and carries implications for how to grow companies at an early stage. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 28-38 %8 09/2018 %G eng %U https://timreview.ca/article/1184 %N 9 %1 Carleton University Eduardo Bailetti is a graduate student undertaking a master’s degree in Entrepreneurship from the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a BA in Economics, at Carleton University and has experience in industry as a manager and a venture founder. His research interests focus on combining and applying theory and practice to grow new ventures early, rapidly, and securely. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1184 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2018 %T Understanding the Role of Rural Entrepreneurs in Telecentre Sustainability: A Comparative Study of the Akshaya and eSeva Projects in India %A Gaurav Mishra %A Balakrishnan Unny R %K developing countries %K entrepreneurship %K India %K services %K sustainability %K telecentres %X In rural areas of India, telecentres provide access to computers and other digital technologies and have been utilized as a delivery channel for various government services. Following a public–private partnership (PPP) model, there is a general belief among policy makers that the revenue from government-to-consumer (G2C) services would be sufficient to cover the village-level entrepreneurs’ cash flow requirements and therefore provide financial sustainability. Also, the literature suggests that telecentres have a large enough market for public-access businesses to be commercially viable. In India, around 100,000 telecentres are being set up to serve 600,000 villages – one telecentre for every six villages – to provide one-window access to government services. In the literature, a lack of government services is often quoted as a reason for telecentre failure. This study, using an exploratory approach, aims to understand the parameters that relate to the sustainability of telecentres across a number of common, government-related services. It is observed that some telecentres perform better than the others even though they have the same number of government-related services. Reasons for such differences are explored and the learnings from this research will benefit the stakeholders who are engaged in providing telecentre-based services in other developing countries. In addition, a theoretical framework is suggested to understand the dynamics between different types of sustainability parameters such as financial, social, staff, technology, and institutional. The findings of this research have policy implications in terms of the way services are designed and delivered through telecentres in developing countries such as India. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 8 %P 16-23 %8 01/2018 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1130 %N 1 %1 Nirma University Gaurav Mishra is an Assistant Professor in the Institute of Management at Nirma University in Ahmedabad, India. Before joining Nirma University, he was associated with the Development Management Institute in Patna and the Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology in Gandhinagar as Assistant Professor. He also worked with International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad in the Knowledge Management and Sharing department. He received his PhD from the University of Reading, United Kingdom. His thesis focused on understanding adoption, social Inequality, and development impact with respect to e-government centres in rural India. He also holds an MS degree from Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology. %2 National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli Balakrishnan Unny R is currently pursuing his PhD in the area of software project management from the National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli (NIT Trichy) in Tamil Nadu, India. He has over 10 years of experience in academia and consulting in the area of IT and risk. He has executed projects in information security, business continuity, IT risk, and IT process improvements. Prof. Balakrishnan also has experience working in projects across multiple domains including financial markets, telecommunications, and IT service provision. He holds an MBA from the University of Sheffield, United Kingdom, with a specialization in IT and risk management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1130 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Comparing the Entrepreneurial Ecosystems for Technology Startups in Bangalore and Hyderabad, India %A M H Bala Subrahmanya %K Bangalore %K ecosystems %K entrepreneurship %K Hyderabad %K India %K startups %K technology %X Technology startups are gaining increasing attention from policy makers the world over because they are seen as a means of encouraging innovations, spurring the development of new products and services, and generating employment. Technology startups tend to thrive when inserted in a conducive entrepreneurial ecosystem. Therefore, ecosystem promotion is being given increasing policy support. However, the emergence and structure of entrepreneurial ecosystems for technology startups have hardly been traced and examined in detail. In India, Bangalore occupies a unique position in the startup world, and Hyderabad is fast emerging as one of the promising startup hubs in the country. Given this background, we set out to explore and examine the structure, evolution, and growth of ecosystems for technology startups in the context of Bangalore and Hyderabad. Both the ecosystems emerged due to the initial foundation laid in the form of government–industry–academia triple helix and their interactions leading to the emergence of a modern industrial cluster followed by an information technology and biotechnology cluster, which then led to R&D cluster serving both the cities. These three clusters together, gradually and steadily, facilitated an entrepreneurial ecosystem for technology startups to emerge. The ecosystem operates within the triple helix model and has a nucleus with two outer layers: i) an inner layer of primary (indispensable) factors and ii) an outer layer of supplementary (secondary) factors. Through the analysis of the experiences of Bangalore and Hyderabad and their ecosystem evolution, its structure, and components, we derive key lessons for others within and beyond India. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 47-62 %8 07/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1090 %N 7 %1 Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore M H Bala Subrahmanya is a Professor of Economics in the Department of Management Studies at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, India. He joined Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore as an Assistant Professor in 1996, was promoted to Associate Professor in 2002, and further to a Professor in 2008. He has more than 27 years of professional experience, of which more than 21 years are at the IISc. During his professional career, he received a Commonwealth Fellowship (1999–2000), a Japan Foundation Fellowship (2004/2005), and a Fulbright-Nehru Senior Research Fellowship (2009/2010). He holds a PhD in Economics from the Institute for Social & Economic Change (ISEC) in Bangalore, and his field of specialization is Industrial Economics. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1090 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda %A Ferran Giones %A Alexander Brem %K definitions %K digital entrepreneurship %K digital technology entrepreneurship %K entrepreneurship %K technology entrepreneurship %K technology Innovation %X Technology entrepreneurship is an established concept in academia. However, recent developments in the context of digital entrepreneurship call for revision and advancement. The multiple possible combinations of technology and entrepreneurship have resulted in a diversity of phenomena with significantly different characteristics and socio-economic impact. This article is focused on the identification and description of technology entrepreneurship in times of digitization. Based on current examples, we identify and describe characterizations of technology entrepreneurship, digital technology entrepreneurship, and digital entrepreneurship. With this new delineation of terms, we would like to foster discussion between researchers, entrepreneurs, and policy makers on the impact of digitization on entrepreneurship, and set a future research agenda. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 44-51 %8 05/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1076 %N 5 %1 University of Southern Denmark Ferran Giones is an Assistant Professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Sønderborg. He received his PhD from La Salle – Ramon Llull University in Barcelona, Spain. His research field is technology entrepreneurship, where he explores how and when technological progress transforms into entrepreneurial activity, and how this entrepreneurial activity results in sustainable organizations and innovative ecosystems. %2 Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Alexander Brem holds the Chair of Technology Management at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) which is located at the Nuremberg Campus of Technology in Germany. Before joining FAU, Alexander was Professor of Technology and Innovation Management and Head of SDU Innovation and Design Engineering at the Mads Clausen Institute at the University of Southern Denmark in Sønderborg. His primary research interest is technology and innovation management with a special focus on interdisciplinary links to psychology, marketing, and entrepreneurship. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1076 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Editorial: 10th Anniversary Issue (July 2017) %A Chris McPhee %K ecosystems %K entrepreneurship %K inclusive innovation %K India %K knowledge commercialization %K living labs %K OSBR %K TIM Review %K topic modelling %K universities %K urban %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 3-4 %8 07/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1086 %N 7 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1086 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Editorial: Collaboration (December 2017) %A Chris McPhee %K collaboration %K collaborative capability %K cooperation %K coworking %K education %K entrepreneurial commitment %K entrepreneurship %K industry %K interdisciplinarity %K SMEs %K startups %K university %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 3-5 %8 12/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1122 %N 12 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1122 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Editorial: Insights (June 2017) %A Chris McPhee %K competitive intelligence %K creativity %K cybersecurity %K entrepreneurship %K internal communication management %K Internet of Things %K service design %K training %K university–industry collaboration %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 3-4 %8 06/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1079 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1079 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Editorial: Insights (November 2017) %A Chris McPhee %K academic publishing %K business models %K cities %K collaboration %K entrepreneurship %K fourth industrial revolution %K Industry 4.0 %K Internet of Things %K IOT %K living labs %K open access %K open data %K Open innovation %K social innovation %K value propositions %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 3-4 %8 11/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1115 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1115 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Editorial: Lean and Global (May 2017) %A Chris McPhee %A Stoyan Tanev %K born global %K entrepreneurship %K global %K international new venture %K internationalization %K lean %K startup %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 3-5 %8 05/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1071 %N 5 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Southern Denmark University Stoyan Tanev is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Innovation, Faculty of Engineering, Southern Denmark University (SDU) in Odense. Dr. Tanev is leading the Technology Entrepreneurship stream of the Master Program of Product Development and Innovation at SDU. He is also an Adjunct Research Professor in the Sprott School of Business at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he is associated with the Technology Innovation Management Program. He has a MSc and a PhD in Physics jointly from the University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, and the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, a PhD in Theology from the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, an MEng in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University, Canada, and an MA from the University of Sherbrooke, Canada. He has multidisciplinary research interests with a focus on the fields of global technology entrepreneurship, technology innovation management, business model design, and value co-creation. Dr. Tanev is Senior IEEE member, as well as member of the editorial boards of the Technology Innovation Management Review, the International Journal of Actor-Network Theory, and Technological Innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1071 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Q&A. Are Universities Ready for Knowledge Commercialization? %A Mohammad Saud Khan %K commercialization %K entrepreneurship %K knowledge %K research %K technology transfer %K universities %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 63-68 %8 07/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1091 %N 7 %1 Victoria University of Wellington Mohammad Saud Khan, PhD, is a Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in the area of Strategic Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Before taking up this role, he was positioned as a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Southern Denmark. Having a background in Mechatronics (Robotics & Automation) Engineering, he has worked as a field engineer in the oil and gas industry with Schlumberger Oilfield Services in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom. His current research interests include innovation management (especially the implications of big data and 3D printing), technology, and social media entrepreneurship. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1091 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Reflecting on 10 Years of the TIM Review %A Chris McPhee %A Teemu Santonen %A Ahmed Shah %A Ali Nazari %K business %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K journal %K management %K open source %K OSBR %K research %K scientometric analyses %K technology %K TIM Review %K topic %K topic modelling %X In July 2007, the first issue of this journal was published under the banner of the Open Source Business Resource. Re-launched with a broader scope in 2011 as the Technology Innovation Management Review, the journal now celebrates its 10th anniversary. In this article, we review the 10-year history of the journal to examine what themes have been covered, who has contributed, and how much the articles have been read and cited. During those 10 years, the journal has published 120 monthly issues, including more than 800 publications by more than 800 international authors from industry, academia, the public sector, and beyond. As discovered with topic modelling, the journal has covered seven themes: open source business, technology entrepreneurship, growing a business, research approaches, social innovation, living labs, and cybersecurity. Overall, the website has attracted over 1 million readers from around the world – 31% from Asia, 30% from the Americas, 26% from Europe, 8% from Africa, and 5% from Oceania – with over 25,000 readers now accessing the site each month. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 5-20 %8 07/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1087 %N 7 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Teemu Santonen is a Principal Lecturer at the Laurea University of Applied Sciences in Finland and is leading Laurea’s Centre for Applied Research and Development (CARD) in the area of Service Design and Open Innovation. At Laurea, he has personally initiated and managed various research projects achieving 2.5 M EUR in cumulative funding. He received his PhD (Econ.) degree in Information Systems Science from Aalto University in Finland in 2005 and has published or presented over 50 papers in international peer-refereed journals and at conferences. Currently, his research interests focus on social network analysis (SNA), Scientometrics”, and innovation management. At Laurea, Santonen has also filed several invention disclosures that have resulted in a startup company and one patent. The Finnish Inventor Support Association has honoured Santonen’s novel crowdsourcing project as the best school-related innovation in Finland. He is also a scientific panel member of ISPIM (The International Society for Professional Innovation Management) and is a former board member of Finnish Strategic Management Society. Prior to his academic career, Santonen worked for over a decade as a consultant and development manager in leading Finnish financial, media, and ICT sector organizations. %3 Global Cybersecurity Resource, Carleton University Ahmed Shah holds a BEng in Software Engineering from Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Canada, and an MEng in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Ahmed has experience working in a wide variety of research roles at the VENUS Cybersecurity Corporation, the Global Cybersecurity Resource, and Carleton University. %4 Global Cybersecurity Resource, Carleton University Ali Nazari is a consultant in the field of information technology and software applications. Ali holds a BSc degree in Computer Science from Shahid Beheshti University in Tehran, Iran, and an MSc degree in Technology Information Management from Payam Noor University, also in Tehran. Currently, he is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management Program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He has 7 years of experience in data analysis, design, and development of IT/software applications and 10 years of experience with planning, consulting, and managing IT/software issues. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1087 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T A Structured Approach to Academic Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from imec’s 101 Programme %A Dimitri Schuurman %A Stan De Vocht %A Sven De Cleyn %A Aron-Levi Herregodts %K academic spin-off %K entrepreneurial action %K entrepreneurship %K incubation %K research valorization %K technology transfer %X In this article, we describe imec’s 101 Programme for academic technology transfer and explain how it supports researchers by following a structured process in a limited amount of time and by carefully involving different stakeholders and people with relevant skills and expertise. The programme combines insights in terms of processes and of team composition from the entrepreneurship literature and puts them into practice in an internal incubation programme that is generated from the bottom-up. Based on hands-on experiences and interviews with key stakeholders in the process, we evaluate the programme and distill lessons learned. The article highlights the importance of a structured technology transfer process in the early stages of opportunity discovery and entrepreneurial action, and it offers insights on team formation for academic spin-offs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 5-14 %8 08/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1095 %N 8 %1 imec Dimitri Schuurman is the Team Lead in User Research at imec.livinglabs and a Senior Researcher at imec – MICT – Ghent University in Belgium. He holds a PhD and a Master’s degree in Communication Sciences from Ghent University. Together with his imec colleagues, Dimitri developed a specific living lab offering targeted at entrepreneurs in which he has managed over 100 innovation projects. Dimitri is responsible for the methodology and academic valorization of these living lab projects and coordinates a dynamic team of living lab researchers. His main interests and research topics are situated in the domains of open innovation, user innovation, and innovation management. His PhD thesis was entitled Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation. %2 imec Stan De Vocht is the Innovation Manager at imec and was previously the Technology Transfer Manager at iMinds. Stan holds a Master of Law (LL.M.) and a Master of Intellectual Property and has been working in the technology transfer sector since his graduation in 2005. Stan has taken the initiative in the creation of the 101 programme and has helped several projects from technology to business. %3 imec Sven De Cleyn graduated with a Master in Commercial Engineering and started his professional career at the University of Antwerp, where he conducted research on high-tech spin-offs from European universities. He joined iMinds (merged with imec since October 2016) in 2011 as Technology Transfer Manager. He is in charge of the imec.istart business acceleration program in which he supports new spin-offs and startups. The program is recognized by UBI Global as one of the leading accelerators worldwide. Today, Sven is also a part-time professor in (high-tech) entrepreneurship at the University of Antwerp. %4 imec Aron-Levi Herregodts is a user specialist at imec.livinglabs and an affiliated researcher at imec-MICT-UGhent. He obtained master’s degrees in Communication Sciences (2013) and Complementary Business Economics (2014). As a user specialist with imec.livinglabs, his role is to translate multi-actor behaviour, needs, and wants to tangible recommendations to provide structure to the innovation process of startups, SMEs, and large organizations. His main interests include open innovation, user innovation, organizational learning, intermediary activities, and user-centric design and methodologies. He has specific interest in the configuration of intermediary learning activities based on the end user with innovation-relevant actors for distinct types of entrepreneurs and innovations. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1095 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Using Artificial Intelligence and Web Media Data to Evaluate the Growth Potential of Companies in Emerging Industry Sectors %A Andrew Droll %A Shahzad Khan %A Ehsanullah Ekhlas %A Stoyan Tanev %K analytics %K artificial intelligence %K business intelligence %K entrepreneurship %K online textual data %K precision medicine sector %K startup growth potential %X In this article, we describe our efforts to adapt and validate a web search and analytics tool – the Gnowit Cognitive Insight Engine – to evaluate the growth and competitive potential of new technology startups and existing firms in the newly emerging precision medicine sector. The results are based on two different search ontologies and two different samples of firms. The first sample includes established drug companies operating in the precision medicine field and was used to estimate the relationship between the firms’ innovativeness and the extent of online discussions focusing on their potential growth. The second sample includes new technology firms in the same sector. The firms in the second sample were used as test cases to determine whether their growth-related web search scores would relate to the degree of their innovativeness. The second part of the study applied the same methodology to the real-time monitoring of the firms’ competitive actions. In our findings, we see that our methodology reveals a moderate degree of correlation between the Insight Engine’s algorithmically computed relevance scores and independent measures of innovation potential. The existence of such correlations invites future work in attempting to analyze company growth potential using techniques founded in web content scraping, natural language processing, and machine learning. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 25-37 %8 06/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1082 %N 6 %1 Gnowit Inc. Andrew Droll is Lead Data Scientist at Gnowit in Ottawa, Canada. Andrew holds PhD and MSc degrees in pure mathematics from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, and he holds a BSc degree in Mathematics and Physics from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. His peer-reviewed publications span the fields of physics, mathematics, and computer science. Currently, Andrew works on development and management of Gnowit’s research and engineering projects. %2 Gnowit Inc. Shahzad Khan is the CTO of Gnowit Inc. in Ottawa, Canada, that provides personalized, real-time web intelligence for individuals and corporations. The firm employs artificial intelligence to automatically gather data from fragmented web sources in near-real-time and filter the data using human-like synthetic cognitive methods to provide highly curated intelligence to their clients. He has a PhD in Computer Science from the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, an MSc in Information Studies from Syracuse University in New York, USA, and a BSc (Hons) in Computer Science from the Lahore University of Management Science (LUMS) in Lahore, Pakistan. His research interests lie in semantic analysis on big data repositories using natural language processing and machine learning at scale. %3 University of Southern Denmark Ehsan Ekhlas is a student and entrepreneur completing studies in Technology Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation at the University of Southern Denmark. Ehsan is also Founder & CEO of Mimac IVS, a company focused on fashion accessories for Apple products. In his research, Ehsan uses technological and big data tools to try to discover insights about how people do work in the real world. %4 Southern Denmark University Stoyan Tanev is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Innovation, Faculty of Engineering, Southern Denmark University (SDU) in Odense. Dr. Tanev is leading the Technology Entrepreneurship stream of the Master Program of Product Development and Innovation at SDU. He is also an Adjunct Research Professor in the Sprott School of Business at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he is associated with the Technology Innovation Management Program. He has a MSc and a PhD in Physics jointly from the University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, and the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, a PhD in Theology from the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, an MEng in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University, Canada, and an MA from the University of Sherbrooke, Canada. He has multidisciplinary research interests with a focus on the fields of global technology entrepreneurship, technology innovation management, business model design, and value co-creation. Dr. Tanev is Senior IEEE member, as well as member of the editorial boards of the Technology Innovation Management Review, the International Journal of Actor-Network Theory, and Technological Innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1082 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Value Propositions for the Internet of Things: Guidance for Entrepreneurs Selling to Enterprises %A David Hudson %K entrepreneurship %K guide %K Internet of Things %K offers %K value propositions %X This article provides entrepreneurs with guidance to help understand and express the specific and compelling value proposition for their Internet of Things (IoT) offer. IoT enables such a wide range of possible short- and long-term opportunities that IoT entrepreneurs may fall into the trap of considering IoT generally rather than positioning their offer to a buyer in a specific manner that helps win deals. The process of understanding and expressing a compelling value proposition will help the IoT entrepreneur focus their offer, understand who the real buyer is, and demonstrate tangible value to that buyer in a manner that is directed towards winning deals. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 5-11 %8 11/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1116 %N 11 %1 David Hudson is a technology management professional who has 30 years experience in industry and academia. Most recently he led new business incubation within the Chief Technology Office at Dell EMC. He is an Executive in Residence at the University of New Brunswick’s Technology Management and Entrepreneurship program. He has been a Lecturer in technology innovation in the MBA program at Carleton University’s Eric Sprott School of Business, a Director of Lead to Win, the Chair of the Ontario Centres of Excellence ICT advisory board, and a consultant to technology firms. Previously, he was the Vice President of advanced research and development at Nortel and has had an extensive career in technology business management as well as R&D. David received his Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Systems Design Engineering from the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. His Doctorate is from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where his research focused on employee innovation on-the-job. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1116 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T The Concept of the Entrepreneurial University Applied to Universities of Technology in Austria: Already Reality or a Vision of the Future? %A Martin Sperrer %A Christiana Müller %A Julia Soos %K entrepreneurial spirit %K entrepreneurial university %K entrepreneurship %K HEInnovate framework %K triple helix %K TU Austria %K TU Graz %K TU Wien %X The concept of the "entrepreneurial university" is now recognized as a major driver for self-development and innovation and as an appropriate response to succeeding in highly turbulent and unpredictable markets. This article outlines and evaluates the current implementation of this concept at the universities of technology (TU) in Austria. First, to evaluate the status quo, a review of existing programs and initiatives was undertaken at the three universities comprising the "TU Austria": TU Graz, TU Wien (Vienna), and MU Leoben. Second, a questionnaire was designed on the basis of the HEInnovate framework and sent to representatives of the three universities and resulted in responses from TU Graz and TU Wien. The results underscore that the model of the entrepreneurial university represents the next step of development in higher education. Moreover, it demonstrates that there is still room for improvement at the TU Austria, especially in terms of fostering an entrepreneurial spirit among students. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 37-44 %8 10/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1026 %N 10 %1 Graz University of Technology Martin Sperrer is a graduate student in Production Science and Management at the Nanyang Technology University in Singapore and Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) in Austria. He holds a Bachelor's degree in Industrial Engineering and Management, also from Graz University of Technology. His key research interests focus on technical processes and entrepreneurship. %2 Graz University of Technology Christiana Müller is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of General Management and Organization at the Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) in Austria. She holds a PhD in Techno-Economics and a Master’s degree in Software Development and Business Management, both from TU Graz. The focus of her PhD was on the flexibility of business models, in particular which parts of the business model have to be flexible and which capabilities are therefore needed. Her current research topics span the area of technology-oriented business model innovation, both in established and start-up companies. She recently started a study to elaborate the influence of advancements in digitalization on business model development. %3 Graz University of Technology Julia Soos is a PhD candidate at the Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) in Austria, where she also holds a Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering and Management. She has work experience as a business consultant covering diverse industries, with a focus on marketing, customer relationship management, and process management. Her current research interests lie in competence development for entrepreneurs in high-technology industries and the concept of the entrepreneurial university. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1026 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Creating Brand India: Strategies, Issues, and Challenges %A Alok Chakrawal %A Pratibha Goyal %K Brand India %K challenges %K economic growth %K entrepreneurship %K government initiatives %K innovation %K Make in India %X Just like a product, person, or institution, a country also has an impression in the minds of people. A brand distinguishes the product of one seller from those of the others. With the Indian Prime Minister's recent call to "Make in India", brand building is receiving more attention and momentum in the country. India is the largest democratic country with the highest GDP, and it is becoming a favourable destination for the global investment giants. But, despite various strengths and successes in image building, the country faces challenges in creating a sustainable, conducive environment for making India a production hub of the world. Bureaucracy, corruption, delay in clearance of business proposals, ethical standards and work culture, tax reforms, political interventions, socio-economic barriers, regionalism, etc. are some of the challenges that must be coped with. This article examines these various issues and challenges that must be overcome in creating Brand India. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 5-9 %8 05/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/985 %N 5 %1 Saurashtra University Alok Chakrawal is a Professor of Commerce and Business Administration, and the Coordinator of the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) at Saurashtra University in Rajkot, India. He holds MCom and PhD degrees, for which he was awarded a Gold Medal upon graduation followed by a Junior Research Fellowship from the University Grants Commission. He is an accomplished international speaker and award-winning author of academic papers and books, particularly in the domain of stress management. He has been the General Manager and Director of SKSE Securities Ltd., Rajkot, and Controller of Examination of Saurashtra University. He also sits on various boards and committees at national and international levels. %2 Punjab Agricultural University Pratibha Goyal is Professor and Director of the School of Business Studies at Punjab Agricultural University in Ludhiana, India. She received her MBA from Guru Nanak Dev University in, Amritsar, India, and her PhD from Punjabi University in Patiala, India. She began her career as a Deputy Manager of Human Resources in a leading industry. Her immense love for mentoring young minds saw a shift in her career when she joined the faculty of Management in Punajbi University, Patiala, and later in Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. She has been the Principal Investigator of three major research projects of the University Grants Commission and has participated in several national seminars, conferences, and symposia. She is on the Board of Directors of Hero Cycles Limited. She has authored five internationally acclaimed books, besides being Executive Editor of the Effective Management journal. She has published several notable research papers in national and international journals and has guided many scholars in their research projects. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/985 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Developing a Startup and Innovation Ecosystem in Regional Australia %A Troy Haines %K Australia %K Cairns %K ecosystems %K entrepreneurship %K incubation %K innovation %K mentorship %K regional %K startups %K theSPACE %X Technology is enabling change at an ever increasing pace, not only in urban contexts, but also in regional centres, where the Internet in particular is enabling entrepreneurs to compete in the global marketplace despite the size and remoteness of their home cities or towns. In regional Australia, the challenges of high unemployment, fading traditional industries, a lack of economic diversity, and a "brain drain" of talent to urban centres highlight the need for novel economic development strategies. Innovation and entrepreneurship are highlighted as potential solutions, but both require knowledge and support to be successful. In this article, the author shares lessons learned as an entrepreneur and through the ongoing development of a self-sustaining startup and innovation ecosystem in the remote region of Cairns, Australia. The model described in this article is now being applied to other regions in Australia, where trained champions are driving the development of startup and innovation ecosystems adapted to regional needs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 24-32 %8 06/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/994 %N 6 %1 theSPACE Australasia Troy Haines is Co-Founder and CEO of theSPACE Australasia in Cairns, Australia. He is also a Startup and Innovation Coach who has worked with hundreds of entrepreneurs across Australia to help them commercialize their ideas. Amongst many awards, he was named Innovation Champion in 2014 by the Minister of Innovation and Premier of Queensland. He was also inducted into the Queensland Government Innovation Wall of Fame for his work in building the North Queensland startup and innovation ecosystem. Troy and the team at theSPACE have developed startup and innovation programs, which they deliver across a wide audience, from high school students and SMEs to government (and everyone in between). He holds a Bachelor's degree in Business (Marketing) from Australia's Charles Sturt University and is currently working towards a Master's degree in Applied Innovation and Entrepreneurship from the University of Adelaide. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/994 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Editorial: Entrepreneurial India (May 2016) %A Chris McPhee %A Dharmesh Raval %K Brand India %K entrepreneurship %K higher education institutions %K India %K intellectual property %K Make in India %K Open innovation %K research %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 3-4 %8 05/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/984 %N 5 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 RK University Dharmesh Raval is Dean of the Faculty of Management and Professor and Director of the School of Management at RK University in Rajkot, India. His teaching and research interests include entrepreneurship, financial performance measurement and analysis, and related areas. He has presented research papers at several national and international conferences and has authored articles in reputed journals. He received his PhD from Saurashtra University in Rajkot. His academic experience includes over 15 years of teaching, research, academic-administration, and industry–academia interface experience in the areas of business management and commerce. He has been on the boards of Rajkot Commodity Exchange (Government of India) in Rajkot and Rajkot Management Association (AIMA) in past. His interests include designing new academic courses and engaging in business-support activities for startups. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/984 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia (June 2016) %A Chris McPhee %K Australia %K design-led innovation %K ecosystem %K entrepreneurship %K hidden innovation %K high-growth startups %K innovation %K innovation catalyst %K ISPIM %K job creation %K National Innovation and Science Agenda %K policy %K regional innovation management %K regions %K strategic management %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 3-4 %8 06/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/991 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/991 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Editorial: Insights (October 2016) %A Chris McPhee %K boundary objects %K ecosystems %K entrepreneurial university %K entrepreneurship %K growth ambitions %K innovation %K knowledge integration %K startups %K strategy %K tacit knowledge %K teaching %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 3-4 %8 10/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1022 %N 10 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1022 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Editorial: Managing Innovation (April 2016) %A Chris McPhee %K creativity %K cybersecurity %K entrepreneurship %K frugal innovation %K innovation %K managing innovation %K national culture %K Open innovation %K projects %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 3-4 %8 04/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/976 %N 4 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/976 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Employment Dynamics of Australian Entrepreneurship: A Management Perspective %A Luke Hendrickson %A Stan Bucifal %A Antonio Balaguer %A David Hansell %K Australia %K creative destruction %K employment %K entrepreneurship %K high growth %K innovation %K management %K productivity %K startup %X This article attempts to draw together the literature on high-growth firms and management capability using Australian Government data from the Expanded Analytical Business Longitudinal Database. We tracked cohorts of new micro-sized firms (startups) over five years from birth. Compared with startups that had a low employment growth trajectory, medium- and high-growth micro-startups exhibited higher financial performance, higher innovation activity, and a greater propensity to seek external (debt or equity) finance. From a management perspective, medium- and high-growth startups were also significantly more likely to monitor and assess their performance across a wider range of performance indicators. High-growth micro-startups exhibited significantly higher operational process and organizational/managerial innovation, a higher likelihood of foreign ownership, and a greater demand for equity finance than medium-growth micro-startups. This data is consistent with other evidence that suggests that sustained high growth comes from superior strategic management and may suggest an ongoing role for government policy in building firm management capability in order to foster employment growth. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 33-40 %8 06/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/995 %N 6 %1 Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia) Luke Hendrickson is Manager of Innovation Research in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he is focused on innovation and measuring the performance of the national innovation system. He is principally responsible for delivering the Government’s annual Australian Innovation System Report, which is now in its seventh year. Luke’s general work interests are in the areas of productivity and competitiveness and how innovative entrepreneurship drives these outcomes across all sectors of the economy. He also has a particular interest in the economics of complexity, measuring management capability, and business eco-innovation. Luke holds a PhD from the Australian National University in Canberra. %2 Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia) Stan Bucifal is a Researcher in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he works as a member of the Innovation Research team. His main research interests are in the field of industry policy, productivity, and innovation. He has experience in industry policy development, cost-benefit analysis applied to carbon emission abatement, and conducting research into intangible capital and the geography of innovation. Stan holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business from the Queensland University of Technology, where he majored in Economics and Finance (QUT), and a Master’s degree in Public Policy, specializing in industry strategy, from the Australian National University in Canberra. %3 Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (Australia) Antonio Balaguer is a Researcher in the Australian Government's Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, where he works as a member of the Innovation Research team. His main research interests are in the fields of innovation, management, and technological change. Antonio was initially trained as chemist and holds a PhD in Political Economy and Asian Studies from Murdoch University in Perth, Australia, and a postgraduate diploma in Public Policy from the Australian National University in Canberra. %4 Australian Bureau of Statistics David Hansell is a Researcher with the Australian Bureau of Statistics, where he has worked since 2008. His main research interests include productivity of exiting and entering firms, and characteristics associated with high-productivity firms. David has an Honours degree in Asian history from the Australian National University in Canberra and a Masters of Economics degree from Macquarie University in Sydney. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/995 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Innovation Rhetoric and Reality: An Introduction to the TIM Review's Special Issue on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia %A Rowena Barrett %K Australia %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K National Innovation and Science Agenda %X In this introduction to the Technology Innovation Management Review's special issue on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia, Guest Editor Rowena Barrett reflects on the perceptions of "innovation", both in terms of its evolving concepts and terminology (the rhetoric) and its frontline application (the reality). Prompted by the recent launch and ongoing implementation of Australia Government's National Innovation and Science Agenda's, this special issue focuses on insights into innovation and entrepreneurship from the Australian context. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 5-10 %8 06/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/992 %N 6 %1 Queensland University of Technology Rowena Barrett is Head of the School of Management at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia. She has played leading roles in organizing, managing, and administering research in universities in Australia and the United Kingdom. Rowena holds a PhD from the University of Melbourne, Australia, on industrial relations in smaller firms, and she has spent many years investigating the ways people in smaller firms are managed and how those firms are organized. She has a sizeable portfolio of research publications including books, book chapters, journal articles, as well practitioner papers and reports. Her research has been funded by university, industry, and government sources in Australia and the United Kingdom. She has extensive experience in teaching in the areas of management, human resource management, and industrial relations, while she has supervised over 10 PhDs to successful completion. She has also held numerous board and council member positions, both within and beyond academia. In 2015, Rowena chaired the ISPIM Innovation Summit "Changing the Innovation Landscape", which took place at QUT in Brisbane, Australia, from 6–9 December. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/992 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Supporting Research-Inspired Entrepreneurial Activities in India %A Nikhil A. Gokhale %K business %K economy %K entrepreneurship %K financial risk %K research-inspired entrepreneurship %X Nations built on innovation, entrepreneurship, and production are able to dominate the world economy. However, risk taking has traditionally been discouraged in developing nations. The uncertainty and financial insecurity associated with entrepreneurial activities are the greatest barriers that budding entrepreneurs need to overcome in order to transition into successful entrepreneurs. This challenge needs substantial effort and steady support from society. Easy access to information, mentorship, and a network of venture capitalists and angel investors also play critical roles in promoting entrepreneurial activities. To this end, the Government of India recently launched a nationwide campaign to promote entrepreneurial activities across the country. Some of the recently emerging trends indicate that scientific and technological innovators from India are now willing to be a part of the global entrepreneurial revolution. Research-inspired entrepreneurial initiatives are expected to play a key role in facilitating India’s economic growth in the coming years. This article focuses on the initiatives undertaken by the Indian Government and by various academic institutes to facilitate entrepreneurial activities across the country. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 14-14 %8 05/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/986 %N 5 %1 RK University Nikhil A. Gokhale is Associate Director of the Faculty of Doctoral Studies & Research at RK University in Rajkot, India. He obtained his Master’s degree from the University of Pune, India, and moved to the United States to pursue his PhD in Chemistry (Biochemistry) at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He then joined the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a Visiting Fellow to study the inositol phosphate-/pyrophosphate-based inhibition of proteins involved in cancer and inflammation. After conducting biomedical research at the NIH and at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Dr. Gokhale returned to the University of Illinois at Chicago as a Visiting Research Assistant Professor. His research interests have focused on the field of biochemistry and signal transduction. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/986 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T TIM Lecture Series – An Introduction to Intellectual Property for Entrepreneurs %A Elizabeth Collinson %K Canada %K CIPO %K copyright %K entrepreneurship %K industrial design %K intellectual property %K patents %K startups %K trade secrets %K trademarks %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 27-29 %8 05/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/989 %N 5 %1 Canadian Intellectual Property Office Elizabeth Collinson is a Project Officer in the Outreach Program of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), where she has worked for more than 20 years in the Trademarks Branch, the Copyright and Industrial Design Branch, and the Information Branch. She has held various roles including Examiner, Policy and Training Officer, Supervisor, Business Development Officer, Project Officer and she was successful in acquiring Trademark Agent status. Currently, Elizabeth works in an Outreach team promoting the awareness and further education of intellectual property. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/989 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T TIM Lecture Series – Startup Life: Lessons Learned in Entrepreneurship %A Andrea Baptiste %K entrepreneurship %K lessons %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 41-42 %8 04/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/981 %N 4 %1 Benbria Corporation Andrea Baptiste is the President and CEO of Benbria Corporation. She is a veteran executive with more than 20 years of experience in telecommunications and network/service management. Prior to joining Benbria, Andrea was co-founder and CEO of Atreus Systems, where she successfully led the company’s growth resulting in its acquisition by Sonus Networks in 2008. Prior to co-founding Atreus Systems, Andrea was responsible for business development at Cambrian Systems, a metro DWDM equipment vendor that was acquired by Nortel Networks in 1998. Andrea’s experience in business leadership includes heading up venture capital financing rounds, merger and acquisitions, as well as establishing strategic partnerships with some of the world’s largest hardware and software companies. Andrea’s prior experience includes management positions at CrossKeys Systems, TeleSat Mobile Inc., and Newbridge Networks. Currently, Andrea is a member of the Queen’s Innovation Connector Advisory Board. Baptiste holds a BA Sc (Honours, Applied Science in Electrical Engineering) from Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and has achieved accreditation as a Professional Engineer of Ontario. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/981 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation %A André Ullrich %A Gergana Vladova %K benefits %K entrepreneurship %K Open innovation %K open innovation participation %K risks %K self-assessment tool %K SMEs %X The positive aspects of open innovation projects are widely discussed in innovation management research and practice by means of case studies and best practices. However, enterprises, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also face miscellaneous challenges in open innovation practice, leading to uncertainty and even renunciation of open innovation project participation. Thus, it is essential for SMEs to find the right balance between possible positive effects and negative consequences – the latter being the less studied “dark sides” of open innovation. However, appropriate methods of finding this balance are still lacking. In this article, we discuss the assessment of open innovation project participation by presenting a weighing and decision process framework as a conceivable solution approach. The framework includes an internal, external, and integrated analysis as well as a recommendation and decision phase. Piece by piece, we investigate the current situation and the innovation goals of the enterprise as an initial point for a decision for or against engaging in open innovation. Furthermore, we discuss the development of a software tool that automatically applies this framework and allows self-assessment by SMEs. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 34-40 %8 04/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/980 %N 4 %1 University of Potsdam André Ullrich has worked as a Research Assistant and a PhD Candidate at the Chair of Business Informatics with an emphasis on Processes and Systems at the University of Potsdam, Germany, since graduating there with a Diploma in Business Administration in 2011. Currently, his research interests are open innovation processes, employee qualification, the performance capability of indicators for assessing organizations, and change capability research. Furthermore, he continuously moderates creativity workshops regarding turbulences in business environments. He has published several national and international articles in the research areas of change capability, creativity techniques, seasonality’s, and employee qualification. %2 University of Potsdam Gergana Vladova is a Research Assistant and a PhD Candidate at the Chair of Business Informatics with an emphasis on Processes and Systems at the University of Potsdam, Germany. She holds a Master's degree in International Economic Relations from the University of National and World Economy in Sofia, Bulgaria, and a Magister degree from the Freie Universitît Berlin, Germany. She has been working within diverse research projects, and she lectures graduate courses and seminars in the field of knowledge management. Her main fields of research are corporate communication and culture, knowledge management, product counterfeiting, and open innovation management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/980 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Editorial: Insights (September 2015) %A Chris McPhee %K cognitive computing %K collaborative design %K competence %K competence-based view %K coordination %K entrepreneurial marketing %K entrepreneurship %K IBM Watson %K innovation activities %K living labs %K Open innovation %K opportunity identification %K user adoption %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 3-4 %8 09/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/924 %N 9 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/924 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T Reflecting on 100 Issues of the TIM Review %A Chris McPhee %K business %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K journal %K management %K Open Source Business Resource %K OSBR %K technology %K technology innovation management review %K TIM Review %X First launched in 2007, the Technology Innovation Management Review has now reached the milestone of 100 issues. This article looks back over these first 100 issues, the themes they covered, trends in authorship and readership, and future opportunities and challenges for the journal. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 5-11 %8 11/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/940 %N 11 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/940 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2015 %T TIM Lecture Series – Three Collaborations Enabling Cybersecurity %A Deborah Frincke %A Dan Craigen %A Ned Nadima %A Arthur Low %A Michael Thomas %K book launch %K collaboration %K cybersecurity %K entrepreneurship %K NSA %K research %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 5 %P 45-48 %8 06/2015 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/906 %N 6 %1 National Security Agency Deborah Frincke is the Director of Research for the National Security Agency/Central Security Service in the United States. Dr. Frincke's research spans a broad cross section of computer security, both open and classified, with a particular emphasis on infrastructure defense and computer security education. She has been a member of several editorial boards, including: Journal of Computer Security, the Elsevier International Journal of Computer Networks, and the International Journal of Information and Computer Security, and she co-edits a Board column for IEEE Security and Privacy. She is a steering committee member for Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID) and Systematic Advances in Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE). Dr. Frincke received her PhD from the University of California, Davis in 1992. %2 Communications Security Establishment Dan Craigen is a Science Advisor at the Communications Security Establishment in Canada and a Visiting Scholar at the Technology Innovation Management Program of Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Previously, he was President of ORA Canada, a company that focused on High Assurance/Formal Methods and distributed its technology to over 60 countries. His research interests include formal methods, the science of cybersecurity, and technology transfer. He was the chair of two NATO research task groups pertaining to validation, verification, and certification of embedded systems and high-assurance technologies. He received his BScH and MSc degrees from Carleton University. %3 Denilson Ned Nadima is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Denilson, a company that develops mobile payment solutions for retail enterprises. He is currently a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and he holds a Bachelor's of Science degree in Commerce and Marketing from the University of Ottawa. %4 Crack Semiconductor Arthur Low is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Crack Semiconductor, a supplier of high-performance cryptographic silicon IP used in some of the most demanding security applications. Arthur has a number of patents in the field of hardware cryptography. He has worked for a number of IC startups as a Senior IC designer and Architect and gained much of his fundamental IC design experience with Bell-Northern Research in the early 1990s and with IBM Microelectronics in the late 1990s. Arthur has a BSc degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and is completing his MSc degree in Technology Innovation Management in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. %# Bedarra Research Labs Michael Thomas is the Vice President of Development at Bedarra Research Labs, a private industrial R&D lab whose mission is to seek out promising next-generation computing and communication technologies and apply them to creative solutions for emerging business problems. Prior to joining Bedarra Research Labs, he worked as a Software Developer and Release Engineer at Object Technology International. Michael holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Athabasca University in Canada, in addition to a Bachelor of Arts degree from Brock University in St. Catharines, Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/906 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T 3D Printing: A Revolutionary Advance for the Field of Urology? %A Rebecca Neu %K 3D printing %K biofabrication %K biological 3D printing %K bioprinting %K entrepreneurship %K nephrology %K organ transplants %K renal failure %X Over the past decade, 3D printing has garnered considerable attention due to its broad applications, its ease of customization, and its increasing affordability. What began as the straightforward replication of simple objects has now progressed into a sophisticated industry for the fabrication of detailed products, which stands to threaten conventional forms of manufacturing and change the face of consumerism. More recently, the technology has found a footing within the medical field with the promise of applying 3D printing for the process of organ generation. With the reality of an aging population, the need for replacement organs globally will increase proportionately, while the number of donors remains static. In the field of urology specifically, the need for organ transplants is ever increasing as the number of patients in renal failure continues to rise. This article reviews the development of biological 3D printing, or biofabrication, within the field of urology and examines both the pros and the cons of this emerging technology. The cost implications of this technology for healthcare facilities are considered, as well as the entrepreneurial opportunities that arise from the emergence and evolution of 3D printing. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 19-24 %8 03/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/772 %N 3 %1 Carleton University Rebecca Neu is a recent graduate of the Sprott School of Business MBA program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. She holds a PhD in Inorganic Chemistry from the University of Toronto, Canada, in addition to an BScH in Inorganic Chemistry from Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada. Currently, her principal area of interest relates to science and technology transfer and commercialization in addition to innovation management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/772 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T The Business of Open Source Software: A Primer %A Michael (Monty) Widenius %A Linus Nyman %K business source %K dual licensing %K entrepreneurship %K open %K open core %K open source business models %K open source licenses %K open source software development %X This article is meant as a primer for those interested in gaining a basic understanding of the business of open source software. Thus, we cover four main areas: i) what motivates businesses to get involved in open source; ii) common open source licenses and how they relate to community and corporate interests; iii) issues regarding the monetization of an open source program; and iv) open source business models currently employed. This article is particularly suitable for people who want a general understanding of the business of open source software; people who want to understand the significant issues regarding an open source program's potential to generate income; and entrepreneurs who want to create a company around open source code. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 4-11 %8 01/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/756 %N 1 %1 MySQL Ab Michael (Monty) Widenius is the founder and original developer of MySQL and MariaDB. He has been an entrepreneur since 1979 and is the founder of MySQL Ab, Monty Program Ab, SkySQL, the MariaDB Foundation, and Open Ocean capital. %2 Hanken School of Economics Linus Nyman is a doctoral researcher at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland, where he is researching code forking in open source software. A further research interest of his is free-to-play gaming. He also lectures on corporate strategy, open source software, and the new business models of the Internet age. Linus has a Master’s degree in economics from the Hanken School of Economics. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/756 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T The Businesses of Open Data and Open Source: Some Key Similarities and Differences %A Juho Lindman %A Linus Nyman %K business models %K entrepreneurship %K licensing %K open data %K open source %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 12-17 %8 01/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/757 %N 1 %1 Hanken School of Economics Juho Lindman is an Assistant Professor of Information Systems Science at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland. Juho's doctoral dissertation from the Aalto University School of Economics in Helsinki focused on open source software development organization In the field of information systems, his current research is focused in the areas of open source software development, open data, and organizational change. %2 Hanken School of Economics Linus Nyman is a doctoral researcher at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland, where he is researching code forking in open source software. A further research interest of his is free-to-play gaming. He also lectures on corporate strategy, open source software, and the new business models of the Internet age. Linus has a Master’s degree in economics from the Hanken School of Economics. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/757 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Developing a Social Network as a Means of Obtaining Entrepreneurial Knowledge Needed for Internationalization %A Chen Han %A Adeleye Afolabi %K business relationships %K entrepreneurship %K internationalization %K knowledge acquisition %K social networks %X An internationalization process for startups is based on the exchange of knowledge and other resources required for early internationalization and fast growth, and it requires ventures to identify opportunities, conduct business, and gain a competitive advantage in a foreign market. But, how do entrepreneurs obtain the knowledge required for internationalization? Previous research suggests a role for the utilization of social networks, leading managers to ask three basic questions: i) what kinds of knowledge-based resources are urgently needed by international new ventures?, ii) how do needs for knowledge change according to different stages in the internationalization process?, and iii) how can changing needs for knowledge be met by developing and leveraging a social network? In this article, we review the related literature, discuss potential answers to these basic questions, and we suggest how a dynamic process can guide new ventures to acquire knowledge for developing resources and conducting business toward internationalization. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 11-18 %8 09/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/827 %N 9 %1 Carleton University Chen Han is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. She has more than eight years working experience in product design, user experience design, and project management. She built and led an independent technical team to provide overall solutions and outsourcing services for various clients including world's top media, Internet startups, and multinational firms. Currently, she is working with the founder team of Pricebeater, a international startup offering tools for online shopping in North America. %2 Carleton University Adeleye Afolabi is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He also holds a Bachelor's degree in Information Resources Management from Babcock University in Nigeria. He is a business-driven technology enthusiast with high-level management experience as the co-founder of Aregen Apparel, Afolexy Project Limited, and Abidafosi Enterprises; a smart-casual clothing company, a registered trucking and haulage business, and a petroleum transport company, respectively. He has work experience in the fields of broadcasting (streaming and telnetting) and finance, with Zenith Bank Group. His research interests include technopreneurial innovation, business information management, and social media marketing. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/827 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Does Social Innovation Require Social Entrepreneurship? %A Asceline Groot %A Ben Dankbaar %K entrepreneurship %K institutional change %K Schumpeter %K social change %K social entrepreneurship %K social innovation %K sustainability %X Social innovation is now considered an important element in the search for solutions to pressing social problems. Inspired by Schumpeter’s conceptualization of innovation, "social" entrepreneurship is thought to contribute to "social" innovation in more or less the same way that "normal" entrepreneurship consists of the introduction of "normal" innovations. In the literature as well as in practice, the definition of concepts such as social innovation and social entrepreneurship has led to considerable confusion. We aim to bring clarity to the debate, arguing that every entrepreneurial action results in some measure of intended or unintended social innovation, regardless of whether the entrepreneurs in question are considered or consider themselves "social" or not. We test our insights in an investigation of 20 social enterprises that have a commercial business model. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 17-26 %8 12/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/854 %N 12 %1 ASN Bank Asceline Groot is Senior Communications Officer at ASN Bank, a Dutch consumer bank that focuses on sustainable investments. She is responsible for the online community of ASN Bank "Voor de Wereld van Morgen| (For the World of Tomorrow). She is also a part-time PhD candidate at the Institute of Management Research of the Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Her research is concerned with the effects of social entrepreneurs on society. She is the author of the books Het Nieuwe Groen (The New Green) and Dromen voor Altijd (Dreams for Ever). %2 Radboud University Nijmegen Ben Dankbaar is Emeritus Professor of Innovation Management at Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands. He is currently a part-time professor at the Automotive Institute of the HAN University of Applied Sciences in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and he is partner in InnoTeP (Innovation in Theory and Practice). He studied social sciences and economics at the University of Amsterdam and has a PhD in Economics from the University of Maastricht in The Netherlands. Ben Dankbaar has published widely on issues of technical change, work organization, innovation management, and industrial policy. He is also an expert on developments in the automobile industry. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/854 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Emerging Technologies (March 2014) %A Chris McPhee %A David Hudson %K 3D printing %K big data analytics %K BYOD %K crowdsourcing %K emerging technology %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K IT consumerization %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-6 %8 03/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/769 %N 3 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Carleton University David Hudson is a lecturer in information technology and innovation in the MBA program at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa, Canada. He is a Director of the Venus Cybersecurity Corporation and the Lead To Win entrepreneurship program, and he is the Chair of the Advisory Board for the Province of Ontario Centres of Excellence Information, Communication, and Digital Media Sector. David also consults with F500 firms on innovation management. David's doctoral research at Carleton focused on IT consumerization and how employees create value for themselves and their firms when they "BYOD". Previously, he was the Vice President for advanced research and development at a large technology firm and has received Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Systems Design Engineering from the University of Waterloo, Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/769 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship (December 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K 3D printing %K business models %K commercialization %K disruption %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K innovation capacity %K innovation culture %K patents %K social entrepreneurship %K social innovation %K spinoffs %K university technology transfer %K value propositions %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-5 %8 12/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/852 %N 12 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/852 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in India (August 2014) %A Chris McPhee %A Kalyan Kumar Guin %K education %K entrepreneurship %K government support %K India %K innovation %K knowledge systems %K policy %K service innovation %K stakeholders %K startups %K uncertainty %K university %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/816 %N 8 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Kalyan Kumar Guin is Dean and Professor at the Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He is an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur and Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi, India, and he is a Fellow of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. His teaching interests cover marketing and operations management, and he has a special interest in quantitative modelling of strategic issues in management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/816 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Insights (July 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K ambidexterity %K business ecosystems %K business models %K entrepreneurship %K improvisation %K innovation %K Internet of Things %K knowledge-intensive business services %K platforms %K public good %K publicly funded research %K standards %K strategy %K value co-creation %K value design %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 07/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/806 %N 7 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/806 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Insights (September 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K born global %K crowdsourcing %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K internationalization %K patent citations %K patent evaluation %K social networks %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 09/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/825 %N 9 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/825 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Opportunities and Capabilities (June 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K capabilities %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K IT capabilities %K IT function %K mobile services %K opportunities %K organizational legitimacy %K patent citations %K patent value %K professional services %K service innovation %K strategy %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3 %8 06/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/798 %N 6 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/798 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Seeking Solutions (February 2014) %A Chris McPhee %K collaboration %K employee entrepreneurship %K entrepreneurial orientation %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K local open innovation %K Open innovation %K Seeking Solutions %K technology adoption %K value creation %K virtual proximity %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 02/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/762 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/762 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Entrepreneurship Education in India: A Critical Assessment and a Proposed Framework %A Rituparna Basu %K entrepreneurship %K India %K management education %K marketing %K qualitative research %X Entrepreneurship education is considered as one of the most influential forces that determine the health of the economy. Hence, ignoring controversies on whether entrepreneurship can be taught, the majority of the top business schools in India offer entrepreneurship education with tailored elective courses to inculcate a wide range of skills encompassing a multi-disciplinary approach among mature management students. However, considering the basic synergies of core management subjects such as marketing and entrepreneurship, both of which provide an opportunity to develop unique solutions to satisfy customer needs, the study of entrepreneurial aspects as a prerequisite for management education and research seems indispensable when specifically catering to the growing entrepreneurial intent in developing economies. This approach necessitates a compulsory initiation of entrepreneurship courses early in the curricula of contemporary business schools. In this context, the present article aims to qualitatively review the current entrepreneurship education regime in India to propose an effective ecosystem for integrating and promoting entrepreneurship education as fundamental to mainstream business education in India. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 5-10 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/817 %N 8 %1 International Management Institute Kolkata Rituparna Basu is Assistant Professor in Marketing, Retail, and Entrepreneurship at the International Management Institute in Kolkata, India. She earned her PhD in Management from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur. She holds a BSc in Economics from St. Xavier's College, Kolkata, and she received a gold medal for her MBA degree. Dr. Basu has over 10 years of industry-academia experience, and she has worked with some of the best-known media companies as well as a startup niche magazine in national sales and marketing profiles for around five years prior to joining IIT. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/817 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Generative Innovation Practices, Customer Creativity, and the Adoption of New Technology Products %A Stoyan Tanev %A Marianne Harbo Frederiksen %K co-creation %K customer creativity %K customer value %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K technology adoption %X We offer a critical reflection on one of the key reasons for the startlingly low success rate of innovation initiatives worldwide – the fact that the interactive environment surrounding the customer is a critical part of the adoption process; it can and should be designed in a way that enables customer creativity, and thus adoption. In this article, we embrace a definition of innovation as “the adoption of a new practice by a community” where the innovator is the one who does not only sense and move into new opportunities but also mobilizes all the necessary resources needed by customers to adopt a new practice. The emphasis on adoption merges together innovation and entrepreneurship by shifting the focus from the inventor and the designer, through the entrepreneur, to the ultimate recipient of the innovative outcomes. Looking at customers as co-creators is critically important for technological product adoption; missing the chance to enable their creativity is equivalent to missing the opportunity of seeing them for who they really are. The result is a distorted vision that is ultimately rooted in the misconception of the dynamics of customer value. We particularly emphasize two points: i) the increasing degree of complexity of everyday technological products requires a higher degree of creativity by customers to adopt; and ii) customer creativity is not only a function of user-technology interaction, it is a function of the various actors in the interactive environment surrounding the customer such as other customers, other technologies, local distributors, customer/technical support providers, and competitors. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 5-10 %8 02/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/763 %N 2 %1 University of Southern Denmark Stoyan Tanev is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Innovation and member of the Centre for Integrative Innovation Management at the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, as well as Adjunct Professor in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he was previously a faculty member in the Technology Innovation Management Program. He has a MSc and a PhD in Physics jointly from the University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France and the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, a PhD in Theology from the University of Sofia, Bulgaria, an MEng in Technology Management from Carleton University, Canada, and an MA from the University of Sherbrooke, Canada. He has multidisciplinary research interests with a focus on the fields of technology innovation management, born global technology startup business model development and value co-creation. Dr. Tanev is Senior IEEE member and member of the Review Board of the Technology Innovation Management Review. %2 University of Southern Denmark Marianne Harbo Frederiksen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Innovation and a member of the Centre for Integrative Innovation Management at the University of Southern Denmark. Currently, she is also a PhD student focusing on creative processes and outcomes in connection with new product development and adoption and therefore the linkages between creativity and innovation. She has an MSc in Architecture from the Aarhus School of Architecture, Denmark, with a specialization within industrial design and product development. She has been co-owner of a design company and has worked in and together with several industries as a designer and R&D Manager as well as an adviser in public-private research projects focusing on user experience, experience designing, and other aspects of product development. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/763 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T The Government of India's Role in Promoting Innovation through Policy Initiatives for Entrepreneurship Development %A Ravindra Abhyankar %K economic growth %K entrepreneurship %K government %K India %K innovation %K innovation ecosystem %K policy %X In spite of having a large publicly funded science and technology infrastructure and a sizeable education base, India has not been able to realize its innovative potential due to a fragmented innovation ecosystem. The government of India has taken many initiatives towards strengthening the innovation ecosystem, the most important of which are: i) the establishment of the National Innovation Council, whose mandate is to coordinate various innovation-related activities, and ii) the new Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013, which is intended to promote entrepreneurship and science-led solutions for sustainable and inclusive growth. With a focus on this new policy initiative, this article describes the current innovation ecosystem and the challenges it faces, and it discusses the efforts made by the government towards the promotion of innovation for entrepreneurship development and sustainable growth. With the implementation of this new policy the early indications are that India is poised to take a big leap towards innovation-led growth. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 11-17 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/818 %N 8 %1 Ravindra Abhyankar is an Electrical Engineer who has worked in the Government of India in various capacities. After working for 17 years in the Ministry of Defense (1974–1990) in the field of quality assurance, technical development, and indigenization of various fighter aircraft and other aeronautical systems, he joined the Ministry of Science and Technology in the Department of Scientific and Industrial research (DSIR). In this ministry, he handled various responsibilities such as administering fiscal incentives for R&D and supporting innovation at the individual and industrial levels for over 20 years (1990–2011). He was the nodal officer in the Government of India for the Asian and Pacific Center for Transfer of Technology (APCTT), which is a United Nations initiative dedicated to capacity building of Asia-Pacific countries to nurture and promote national innovation systems and also to create enabling environments for the development and transfer of technology and R&D management. He has also functioned as an Adviser to the Science and Technology Minister of Mozambique (2012–2014) in the creation of a publicly funded R&D system for the benefit of Mozambican industry. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/818 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Improvising Entrepreneurship %A Tom Duxbury %K adaptation %K agile development %K bricolage %K effectuation %K entrepreneurship %K improvisation %K improvised behaviour %K lean startup %X Improvisation is reviewed in the context of mainstream routines that modern startups use to adapt to changing environments. The increasing interest in flexible methodologies such as lean startup is one indication that organizations need to consider alternatives when the rate of change exceeds the ability to plan for it. Empirical studies indicate that improvisation is an important, yet understudied part of organizational life in new ventures. It is argued that entrepreneurs improvise not just out of necessity, but because they have chosen an occupation that is congruent with the practice and likely have a disposition towards the behaviour. Lessons from contexts in jazz and theatre are provided for entrepreneurs, and it is recommended that evidence of past success with improvisation be used to select candidates for improvisational work. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 22-26 %8 07/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/809 %N 7 %1 Carleton University Tom Duxbury teaches innovation and entrepreneurship at the Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, where he is a PhD candidate. A serial entrepreneur, startup advisor, and executive, Tom has co-founded several technology ventures and been awarded a variety of patents. Tom earned an engineering degree from the University of Waterloo and an MBA from Queen's University. He is currently developing a behaviour-based measure of improvisation as part of his doctoral research. For further information, or to participate in his study of improvisation, please contact the author. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/809 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Mobile Convergence and Entrepreneurial Opportunities for Innovative Products and Services %A Jeff Moretz %A Chirag Surti %K Canada %K competition %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K mobile convergence %K mobile services %K wireless pricing %X Our research on 2012 and 2013 Canadian wireless service pricing indicates that data was underpriced relative to traditional voice and text messaging services. Such a situation, while potentially disadvantaging consumers of traditional mobile services, created a market that favoured competitors pursuing innovative uses of mobile data. Although more competitive pressures in the telecommunications market would provide broader benefits to Canadian consumers and facilitate greater innovation in related services, a favorable pricing differential vis-à-vis data transmission provides useful incentives. Even with recent changes to the pricing of mobile services in Canada, we should expect continued development of services that substitute data for voice and text messaging, particularly for international communications, as well as more innovative uses of mobile data. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 14-21 %8 06/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/800 %N 6 %1 University of Ontario Institute of Technology Jeff Moretz is Assistant Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) in Oshawa, Canada. He obtained his PhD from the University of Texas at Austin, USA, and has an MBA and two undergraduate degrees from Michigan State University, USA. He is a recovering consultant, having worked for McKinsey & Company in Chicago after his MBA studies. Prior to joining the UOIT, he worked at University College Cork in Ireland, researching open source software communities and open innovation. His research interests focus on the impact of information, openness, and information technologies on innovation, business models, and strategies. %2 University of Ontario Institute of Technology Chirag Surti is an Assistant Professor of Logistics and Supply Chain Management at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) in Oshawa, Canada. He earned a PhD degree from McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada, and a Master of Science in Industrial Engineering from the State University of New York in Buffalo, USA. His primary research interest is in the area supply chain management and understanding and analyzing the role process innovation can play in boosting productivity. He is a recipient of NSERC Discovery and SSHRC Partnership grants. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/800 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Q&A. What is the Future of Entrepreneurship in India? %A Ritu Dubey %K ecosystem %K entrepreneurship %K incubators %K India %K social entrepreneurship %K support agencies %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 46-49 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/822 %N 8 %1 JSSATE Science & Technology Entrepreneurs Park Ritu Dubey is Senior Manager of the JSSATE Science & Technology Entrepreneurs Park in Noida, India, which is a technology business incubator supported by the Government of India's Department of Science and Technology. For the past four years, she has been active in the development sector in the domain of innovation and entrepreneurship promotion. She has also been managing the incubator’s seed fund scheme for technology startups and managed the outreach centre for innovation funding under the Technopreneur Promotion Programme of the government's Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. Before joining JSSATE, she was a commissioned officer of the Indian Army, and she holds a Post-Graduate Diploma in Management from the Institute of Management Technology in Ghaziabad, India. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/822 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Resolving Legitimacy Deficits in Technology Startups through Professional Services Practices %A Jay Payette %K entrepreneurship %K impression of viability %K legitimacy %K new ventures %K operational verification %K organizational legitimacy %K pragmatic legitimacy %K pragmatic validation %K professional services %K technology startups %K viability %X As new ventures, technology startups face a key challenge that is specifically associated with their young age: a perceived lack of organizational legitimacy. Organizational legitimacy is an important factor in the growth and survival of new ventures and is therefore an important issue for managers and entrepreneurs to address. Although there are many different typologies for defining types of organizational legitimacy, this article argues that technology startups should focus on developing external pragmatic legitimacy as a means of acquiring the resources required to grow and thrive. However, despite the many ways by which an organization can develop external pragmatic legitimacy, few are well suited to technology startups. Based on a review of the different types of organizational legitimacy and an assessment of their applicability to the context of technology startups, this article recommends that technology entrepreneurs should consider the creation of professional services practices to help develop external pragmatic legitimacy and overcome the “liability of newness”. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 22-27 %8 06/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/801 %N 6 %1 Carleton University Jay Payette is a graduate student in the Master of Design program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and he is Managing Principal of Payette Consulting. Jay founded Payette Consulting in 2011 to help clients balance the consistent results of repeatable business processes and analytic decision making, with the fuzzy world of creativity. His research has focused on applying design-thinking principles to business model generation, strategy, and project delivery. Prior to founding Payette Consulting, Jay worked for the Canadian consulting practice of Accenture and as an independent IT Project Manager. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/801 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Reviewing the Knowledge Systems of Innovation and the Associated Roles of Major Stakeholders in the Indian Context %A Punit Saurabh %A Prabha Bhola %A Kalyan Kumar Guin %K entrepreneurship %K government %K higher-education institutions %K industry %K innovation ecosystem %K innovation system %K knowledge systems %K models %K stakeholders %K university %X In this article, we review various models of knowledge systems and discusses the relationships between various component stakeholders of innovation, namely higher-education institutions, industry, and government. The article uses India as a case study to examine new challenges and opportunities facing its innovation ecosystem. Within this context, we review existing models of knowledge systems through an innovative representation exemplifying the knowledge landscape and the model positioning. We argue for a reinforcing role of major stakeholders in the proliferation of innovation and entrepreneurship, and the need to promote healthy interactions between them. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 36-45 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/821 %N 8 %1 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Punit Saurabh recently completed his PhD in the domain of innovation and entrepreneurship development from the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He has hands-on experience in managing government innovation and entrepreneurship funding programs and is also involved with the academic aspects of entrepreneurship. %2 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Prabha Bhola is an Assistant Professor in the Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India, where she also received her PhD in Poverty Economics. She has wide range of teaching experience at different institutions. %3 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Kalyan Kumar Guin is Dean and Professor at the Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He is an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur and Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi, India, and he is a Fellow of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. His teaching interests cover marketing and operations management, and he has a special interest in quantitative modelling of strategic issues in management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/821 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T The Role of Managers as Agents in Successful Service Innovations: Evidence from India %A Shiv S. Tripathi %K agents %K entrepreneurship %K global organizations %K India %K intrapreneurship %K managers %K service innovation %X The article is based on a three-year study of 70 business executives belonging to 20 large organizations operating in India to identify the kind of interventions used by agents (managers) to make service innovations successful. For the purpose of analysis, the subject organizations were classified into highly successful, successful, and unsuccessful organizations on the basis of their growth rate, and their practices were analyzed to identify the role of agents in those processes or related decisions. The article also compares the practices followed by organizations based in India with global organizations operating in India to understand the contextual issues of service innovations. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 18-26 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/819 %N 8 %1 Management Development Institute Gurgaon Shiv S. Tripathi is an Assistant Professor in the area of Strategic Management at the Management Development Institute in Gurgaon, India. He holds a PhD degree from Vinod Gupta School of Management at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. He has published papers in the area of product and service innovations, growth strategies, and innovations in large organizations. He has presented papers at national and international conferences organized by the Indian Institutes of Management, Indian School of Business, and Strategic Management Society, USA. His current research interests include service innovations, open innovations, ambidexterity, and innovation in large organizations. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/819 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T TIM Lecture Series – The Business of Open Source %A Michael Weiss %K architecture %K business models %K community %K engagement %K entrepreneurship %K licensing %K open source software %K patterns %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 28-31 %8 01/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/759 %N 1 %1 Carleton University Michael Weiss holds a faculty appointment in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and is a member of the Technology Innovation Management program. His research interests include open source, ecosystems, mashups, patterns, and social network analysis. Michael has published on the evolution of open source business, mashups, platforms, and technology entrepreneurship. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/759 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Editorial: Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship (April 2013) %A Chris McPhee %A Jean-Pierre Segers %K business ecosystems %K entrepreneurial orientation %K entrepreneurship %K incubation %K innovation %K Open innovation %K partnership %K R&D %K regional innovation system %K strategy %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 3-5 %8 04/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/672 %N 4 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 PXL University College Jean-Pierre Segers is Dean of the Business School at PXL University College in Hasselt, Belgium, and he is the Chairman and co-founder of Creative Inc.. He holds a Master's degree in Applied Economics and Public Affairs and is a former researcher in the Small Business Research Institute at the University of Brussels. His main research interests are small businesses and entrepreneurship; innovation and technology management; national and regional systems of innovation; and public-private partnerships. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/672 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Q&A. How Do You Program Innovative Thinking into Company Culture? %A Tim Ragan %K business strategy %K company culture %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 44-47 %8 10/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/736 %N 10 %1 C-View Strategies Tim Ragan is the founder/owner of C-View Strategies, a business-design consultancy, and he is the owner of Career Coaching International , where he helps people discover their talents and interests, and accelerate their career objectives. He has over 25 years of experience in numerous functional, management, and executive capacities on three continents with major communications players including Mitel, Nortel, Newbridge Networks, and Alcatel. Tim has a BSc in Electrical Engineering from the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and an MBA from the University of Ottawa, Canada, where he teaches “Business & Society”, a course that examines the ethical and moral implications of modern business and its interaction with government and civil society. He also regularly teaches graduate-level courses on business-process transformation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/736 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T Securing Canada’s Information-Technology Infrastructure: Context, Principles, and Focus Areas of Cybersecurity Research %A Dan Craigen %A D’Arcy Walsh %A David Whyte %K Canada %K cyberdefence %K cyberinfrastructure %K cybersecurity %K entrepreneurship %K experimental development program %K information-technology infrastructure %K management %K research %X This article addresses the challenges of cybersecurity and ultimately the provision of a stable and resilient information-technology infrastructure for Canada and, more broadly, the world. We describe the context of current cybersecurity challenges by synthesizing key source material whose importance was informed by our own real-world experiences. Furthermore, we present a checklist of guiding principles to a unified response, complete with a set of action-oriented research topics that are linked to known operational limitations. The focus areas are used to drive the formulation of a unified and relevant research and experimental development program, thereby moving us towards a stable and resilient cyberinfrastructure. When cybersecurity is viewed as an inherently interdisciplinary problem of societal concern, we expect that fundamentally new research perspectives will emerge in direct response to domain-specific protection requirements for information-technology infrastructure. Purely technical responses to cybersecurity challenges will be inadequate because human factors are an inherent aspect of the problem. This article will interest managers and entrepreneurs. Senior management teams can assess new technical developments and product releases to fortify their current security solutions, while entrepreneurs can harness new opportunities to commercialize novel technology to solve a high-impact cybersecurity problem.. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 12-18 %8 07/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/704 %N 7 %1 Communications Security Establishment Canada Dan Craigen is a Science Advisor at the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC). Previously, he was President of ORA Canada, a company that focused on High Assurance/Formal Methods and distributed its technology to over 60 countries. His research interests include formal methods, the science of cybersecurity, and technology transfer. He was the chair of two NATO research task groups pertaining to validation, verification, and certification of embedded systems and high-assurance technologies. He received his BScH in Math and his MSc in Math from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. %2 Communications Security Establishment Canada D’Arcy Walsh is a Science Advisor at the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC). His research interests include software-engineering methods and techniques that support the development and deployment of dynamic systems, including dynamic languages, dynamic configuration, context-aware systems, and autonomic and autonomous systems. He received his BAH from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada, and he received his BCS, his MCS, and his PhD in Computer Science from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. %3 Communications Security Establishment Canada David Whyte is the Technical Director for the Cyber Defence Branch at the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC). He is CSEC's technical lead responsible for overseeing the implementation of the next-generation cyberthreat-detection services for the Government of Canada. He has held many positions over the last 16 years within CSEC that span both the Signals Intelligence and Information Technology Security mission lines. David holds a PhD in Computer Science from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. The main focus of his research is on the development of network-based behavioural analysis techniques for the detection of rapidly propagating malware. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/704 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T TIM Lecture Series – Enhancing Competitive Position Through Innovation Beyond R&D %A Sorin Cohn %K Canada %K commercialization %K competition %K culture %K entrepreneurship %K globalization %K innovation %K managing innovation %K metrics %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 34-38 %8 05/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/686 %N 5 %1 BD Cohnsulting Inc. Sorin Cohn has 35 years of international business and technology experience, having been involved in most facets of innovation development: from idea to research and lab prototype, from technology to product, and then to market success on the global stage. He has developed new technologies, created R&D laboratories, started new product lines, and initiated and managed new business units. Sorin has several essential patents in web services, wireless, and digital signal processing, as well as over 70 publications and presentations. He has also been Adjunct Professor at the University of Ottawa. He is a Killam Scholar, and he holds a PhD in Electrical Engineering, an MSc in Physics, and an MEng in Engineering Physics. Sorin is President of BD Cohnsulting Inc. As well, he acts as Leader of Innovation Metrics at The Conference Board of Canada and as Chief Program Officer of i-CANADA. He is also Member of the Board of Startup Canada as well as the Board of the Centre for Energy Efficiency. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/686 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2013 %T TIM Lecture Series – Green Business Models to Change the World: How Can Entrepreneurs Ride the Sustainability Wave? %A Mika Westerlund %K business models %K eco-efficiency %K entrepreneurship %K green innovation %K sustainability %K value creation %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 3 %P 53-57 %8 07/2013 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/707 %N 7 %1 Carleton University Mika Westerlund, D.Sc. (Econ.) is an Assistant Professor at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa, Canada. He previously held positions as a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley and in the School of Economics at Aalto University. Mika earned his doctoral degree in Marketing from the Helsinki School of Economics. His doctoral research focused on software firms’ business models and his current research interests include open innovation, business strategy, and management models in high-tech and service-intensive industries. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/707 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Chinese Entrepreneurs Go Global %A Daniel Zhou %K China %K entrepreneurship %K familism %K go global %K guanxi %K Kirzner %K Schumpeter %X China may be on the tipping point of explosive global growth. In response to changes in the global economy and an economic slowdown domestically, hundreds of thousands of Chinese SMEs are being encouraged to “go global” by their central and local governments. To a Chinese company, going global requires the expansion of its existing business in other countries or the development of new ventures with partners operating in other countries. Explosive growth in China may be possible, but it will depend on an appropriate strategy for going global. For a country that has firmly established itself as an international manufacturing hub, going global requires a shift in its entrepreneurial capacity, which is the focus of this article. We first assess the current situation in China to understand its current entrepreneurial focus and capacity, as well as the impetus for change. Next, we contrast the Kirznerian and Schumpeterian views of entrepreneurship to illustrate that – to go global – Chinese entrepreneurs must shift from an emphasis on exploiting pricing inefficiencies (i.e., Kirznerian entrepreneurship) to an emphasis on innovation (i.e., Schumpeterian entrepreneurship). Finally, we examine unique characteristics of the business environment and culture in China, which are likely to impact the ability of Chinese entrepreneurs to go global. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 28-31 %8 02/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/524 %N 2 %1 Carleton University Daniel (Dongyang) Zhou is a software designer at Ciena Networks; prior to this, he has worked at a variety of technology-based companies, including Alcatel-Lucent and Nortel. He is also a Master’s student in Carleton University’s Technology Innovation Management program. His interests include open source business, strategic planning for technology-based SMEs, and international business between China and North America. Daniel was born in China and came to Canada in 2001, which gives him perspectives on both Canadian and Chinese cultures. He graduated with High Distinction in Electrical Engineering from Carleton University in 2007. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/524 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Creativity: Linking Theory and Practice for Entrepreneurs %A Tom Duxbury %K commercialization %K creativity %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %X In this article, creativity research is brought into focus for those involved in the practice of entrepreneurship. The author provides a background on creativity research, how it is defined, and systems models that attempt to explain it. The author distinguishes between creative and innovative activities, and provides advice to entrepreneurs to help realize the creative potential of their organizations. The author reinforces the view that entrepreneurs create new value by investing in ideas, and specific recommendations are made for creating supportive structures, building teams of creative individuals, and successfully championing ideas to acquire the resources they need to produce innovations. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 10-15 %8 08/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/594 %N 8 %1 Sprott School of Business Tom Duxbury is Entrepreneur in Residence at Wesley Clover Technologies, a private equity incubator. He is an advisor to many startups, having co-founded several technology ventures and been awarded a variety of patents. Tom received his engineering degree from the University of Waterloo and an MBA from Queen's University. He is currently completing his PhD in Management at the Sprott School of Business at Carleton University in Ottawa, where he teaches courses in entrepreneurship and innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/594 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Editorial: Born Global (October 2012) %A Chris McPhee %A Tony Bailetti %K born global %K entrepreneurs %K entrepreneurship %K export %K globalization %K internationalization %K startups %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent FIrst Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 3-4 %8 10/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/613 %N 10 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Carleton University Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/613 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Editorial: Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century (August 2012) %A Chris McPhee %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K technology entrepreneurship %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 3-4 %8 08/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/592 %N 8 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/592 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Editorial: Technology Entrepreneurship (February 2012) %A Chris McPhee %A Tony Bailetti %K entrepreneur %K entrepreneurship %K technology entrepreneurship %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 3-4 %8 02/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/519 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review and is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland. %2 Carleton University Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/519 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Entrepreneurial Effort in the Theory of the Firm %A David Hudson %K emancipation %K employee %K entrepreneurship %K technology %K theory of the firm %X This article develops a link between the theory of the firm and entrepreneurship theory to enable the study of employee entrepreneurial behaviour. First, we describe how incomplete contracts permit employee entrepreneurial effort in the theory of the firm. Next, we argue that emancipation offers an explanation for entrepreneurial effort that is not motivated by financial gain. Finally, we show how new technology creates conditions where the boundary of the firm may change and where entrepreneurial effort by employees may occur. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 13-16 %8 02/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/521 %N 2 %1 Carleton University David Hudson is pursuing doctoral studies and is a lecturer in the MBA program at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa Canada. His research focus considers entrepreneurial effort by employees and changes arising from consumer technology use in industry. Previously, David was the Vice President for Advanced Research and Technology at a large technology firm and has had an extensive career in technology development and product line management. He received Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Systems Design Engineering from the University of Waterloo. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/521 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T From Business Administration to Business Creation: The Case of the Kalevala Global Business Creation School %A Marko Seppä %K business creation %K business school %K co-creation %K entrepreneurship %K knowledge investing %K Open innovation %K university %X Are there any businesses left to administer? The question is of course rhetorical and aimed at underscoring how several societies are more severely in need of creators of new businesses than managers of established ones. And yet, nearly all universities only produce masters of business administration, at best. Apart from theoretical research about business creation, and the education of masters of such research, universities are generally not equipped to produce knowledge for business creation or to produce masters of business creation. This conceptual article calls for a new, complementary approach to research and education, around the theme of global business creation. Due to the limitations and restrictions related to the traditions and practices of the science of business administration, where the means justify the ends, a new exploratory field coined as the “Art of Business Creation,” where the end justifies the means, is being explored for some inspiration. For a concrete solution, the concept of a globally distributed, enterprise-centric, entrepreneurial-faculty-driven, open-innovation-based, and social-media-empowered university entity is depicted in this article. It is a new-generation private-public-partnership and “Living Lab 2.0” referred to as Kalevala Global Business Creation School. The conceptualization draws from observations and action research during the Global Venture Lab Finland experiment at the University of Jyväskylä from 2007 to 2011. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 6-11 %8 06/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/562 %N 6 %1 Global Enabler Marko Seppä is “serial co-creator” and knowledge investor specialized in growth venture creation. He was apprenticed as venture capitalist by Panostaja Group, in Finland in the late 1980s. Since 1991, he has led the co-creation of three enabler organizations: FVC, a pioneering venture capital firm for the emerging markets of Russia and the Baltic countries; eBRC, an ambitious e-business research center for a local pilot of eEurope; and GVL Finland, a global venture lab experiment for University Alliance Finland. He holds an MSc in Management from the University of Tampere and a PhD in Corporate Strategy from the University of Jyväskylä. He is currently engaged in the co-creation of Global Enabler: A community, platform and factory of enablers of global business creation for problems worth solving. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/562 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Global Mindset: An Entrepreneur's Perspective on the Born-Global Approach %A Robert Poole %K born global %K economic development %K entrepreneurship %K globalization %K internationalization %K startup %X The born-global approach calls for a startup to address the needs of a global market from inception. This approach provides an attractive alternative to the conventional staged approach to internationalization whereby a startup first operates in its home market and then enters one or more foreign markets sequentially. This article highlights the mindset change that an entrepreneur must make to move from the conventional staged approach to the born-global approach. The author of this article is an experienced entrepreneur and the article describes his own mindset change that occurred when enacting the born-global approach. The author uses his own experience and company as a case study to develop recommendations for other entrepreneurs who are evaluating the born-global approach to launch and grow a technology company. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 27-31 %8 10/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/617 %N 10 %1 Freebird Connect Robert Poole is an entrepreneur, a chartered accountant, and a recent graduate of the MEng program in Technology Innovation Management at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Robert has 15 years of experience building and deploying business intelligence and social analytic solutions to global enterprises. As a consultant, Robert has provided his expertise to private and public-sector clients including federal, provincial, and regional governments. As an entrepreneur, Robert has created several technology-related companies and has appeared on CNBC's Power Lunch. Robert combines knowledge learned at the university with his practical experience to improve the fortunes of his company: FreebirdConnect. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/617 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T A Guide for Entrepreneurs Who Lead and Manage Change %A Llynne Plante %K change management %K entrepreneurship %K leadership %X To grow a business, entrepreneurs must know how to lead and manage change. However, the change management literature offers little in the way of specific, practical advice that leaders can use to guide their actions. This article builds on a review of the change management literature, a small field study, and years of experience supporting technology companies. It identifies and describes the top nine leadership actions (and their associated behavioural traits) that technology entrepreneurs who lead and manage change should carry out. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 27-31 %8 03/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/536 %N 3 %1 NRC-IRAP Llynne Plante is Regional Director for Eastern and Northeastern Ontario with the Industrial Research Assistance Program of the National Research Council Canada (NRC-IRAP). Llynne has a strong experience in finance, international business, R&D, and technology entrepreneurship from both the private and public sectors. Prior to joining NRC-IRAP, Llynne worked at Public Works Government Services Canada (PWGSC), at Export Development Canada, and in business and engineering roles in small Canadian technology firms. Llynne holds an EMBA from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/536 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T How Open Source Has Changed the Software Industry: Perspectives from Open Source Entrepreneurs %A Juho Lindman %A Risto Rajala %K entrepreneurship %K narrative methodology %K Open innovation %K open source software %K service-dominant logic %X The emergence of F/LOSS (free/libre open source software) has triggered several changes in the software industry. F/LOSS has been cited as an archetypal form of open innovation; it consists of the convergence and collaboration of like-minded parties. An increasing number of software firms have taken upon this approach to link outsiders into their service development and product design. Also, software firms have been increasingly grounded their business models on user-centric and service-oriented operations. This article describes a study that investigates these changes from the perspective of F/LOSS entrepreneurs. The findings are summarized into four issues that are critical in managing an F/LOSS business: i) dealing with organizational changes in the innovation process; ii) mastering user involvement; iii) successfully using resources; and iv) designing revenue models. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 5-11 %8 01/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/510 %N 1 %1 Hanken School of Economics Juho Lindman is an Assistant Professor in the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland. Juho defended his doctoral dissertation focusing on open source software development organization in the Aalto University School of Economics in Helsinki. In the field of information systems science, his current research is focused in the areas of open source software development, open innovation, open data and organizational change. %2 Aalto University Risto Rajala is Director of Research in a multi-school collaboration platform in service research and education at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. His recent research has been centered on user-centric and open forms of managing software-intensive innovations, the transformation of software vendors’ business models, IT services and the socio-technical aspects of service systems. Risto holds a PhD in Information Systems Science from the Aalto University, School of Economics. His work has been published widely in refereed scientific journals, international conference proceedings, academic books, and other scientific volumes. He is also a member of the Review Board of the Technology Innovation Management Review. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/510 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Managing Entrepreneurial Employees Who Bring Their Own IT to Work %A David Hudson %K consumer IT %K corporate IT %K entrepreneurship %K intrapreneur %K theory of the firm %K value creation %X Why do some employees invest their own time and money to acquire consumer information technology (IT) for use in the workplace as corporate IT? This behaviour occurs even when their firms already possess considerable IT resources. Moreover, IT governance policies typically oppose the use of unsanctioned IT within the firm. IT governance assumes that the only IT assets that are relevant to the firm are those that are owned by the firm. However, employees can create value for the firm by combining their personal IT assets with the firm's IT assets. Creating novel asset combinations is consistent with entrepreneurship but entrepreneurship theory does not address this type of voluntary employee entrepreneurship using personal IT assets. This article proposes a link between the theory of the firm and entrepreneurship theory to explain why employees act entrepreneurially. This link is significant because it advances the notion that employees of established firms can be entrepreneurial when they use their own consumer IT as corporate IT. This link is also significant because it suggests that managing employee entrepreneurship requires tolerance of value creation that is emergent and can occur within a firm. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 6-11 %8 12/2012 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/633 %N 12 %1 Carleton University David Hudson is pursuing doctoral studies and is a lecturer in the MBA program at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa, Canada. His research focus considers entrepreneurial effort by employees and changes arising from consumer technology use in industry. Previously, David was the Vice President for Advanced Research and Technology at a large technology firm and has had an extensive career in technology development and product line management. He received Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Systems Design Engineering from the University of Waterloo. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/633 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Organizational Ambidexterity: How Small Technology Firms Balance Innovation and Support %A John Schreuders %A Alem Legesse %K ambidextrous organization %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K support %X Many technology entrepreneurs start their companies by focusing on an innovation that creates a market offer to attract their first customers. When the entrepreneur’s firm makes its first sale, the dynamics of the organization change and the entrepreneur faces a new challenge: how can the firm concurrently develop new products and support existing customers? This problem is of great concern to entrepreneurs who own small technology firms and is the subject of this article. In this article, we first address the innovate-versus-support dilemma that small technology firms face early in their lifecycles. Next, we describe the paradigm of the ambidextrous organization. We conclude with a discussion of five mechanisms small firms can use to achieve balance in their quest to concurrently satisfy the need to innovate while fulfilling the demands of existing clients and products. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 17-21 %8 02/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/522 %N 2 %1 Carleton University John Schreuders is a senior software systems engineer at Mitel Networks in Kanata, Ontario. John is a licensed professional engineer with Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO). After graduating from the Royal Military College in Kingston, John started his engineering career as a combat systems engineer in the Canadian Navy. After that, he went on to work for defence contractors and later for the International Space Station project. Recently John returned from working in New York as a software systems engineer for Wall Street. He is currently pursuing his Master’s degree in Technology Innovation Management at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. %2 Carleton University Alem Legesse is pursuing his M.Eng studies in Carleton University’s Technology Innovation Management program in Ottawa, Canada. He is the founder of Syncrodata Inc., a software company that provides software development services for Android, Blackberry, and iOS devices. He holds an MSc degree offered jointly by computer science, engineering, and mathematics at Carleton University. His research interests are mobile developments, telecommunications, open source, and business models. He previously worked as a software designer for RIM, Alcatel-Lucent, and Nortel, and as a flight security analyst for Transport Canada. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/522 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T The Role of Universities in Technology Entrepreneurship %A Jonathan Wells %K business parks %K economic development %K entrepreneurship %K intellectual property %K research %K spinoffs %K universities %X This article discusses the role that universities play in the process of technology entrepreneurship, where entrepreneurship is restricted to the process of launching and supporting small and medium-sized technology-based businesses. The article briefly discusses a few of the issues that influence a university’s participation in the process of entrepreneurship. Although there is no “one-size-fits-all” model, the article discusses various ways that Canadian universities may help entrepreneurs, including contract research, the provision of business parks, and sensible handling of intellectual property issues. Finally, the article suggests that the return on “investment”, for both the university and the province, is a difficult thing to measure – nevertheless, participation in the entrepreneurship process may result in some tangible and intangible benefits for both parties. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %V 2 %P 35-40 %8 04/2012 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/549 %N 4 %1 Carleton University Jonathan Wells is Executive Director, Research Centre in Technology Innovation, at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Jonathan comes from a background of software engineering, with experience in all sizes of high-tech business, from very small startups upwards to large multinationals. He founded and ran a small software development and consultancy business for several years and subsequently worked as a project manager for HP software development teams in New Zealand, later holding the position of CIO for the Meat Inspection Branch of the NZ Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Jonathan has an undergraduate degree in Physics and Computer Science and holds an MBA from the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/549 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects %A Tony Bailetti %K entrepreneurs %K entrepreneurship %K technology entrepreneurs %K technology entrepreneurship %X Technology entrepreneurship lies at the heart of many important debates, including those around launching and growing firms, regional economic development, selecting the appropriate stakeholders to take ideas to markets, and educating managers, engineers, and scientists. Unless a generally accepted definition of technology entrepreneurship is established, however, these debates lose their focus. The purpose of this article is to identify the themes that dominate the technology entrepreneurship literature, provide a definition of technology entrepreneurship, and identify its distinguishing aspects relative to economics, entrepreneurship, and management. The author argues that technology entrepreneurship is an investment in a project that assembles and deploys specialized individuals and heterogeneous assets to create and capture value for the firm. What distinguishes technology entrepreneurship from other entrepreneurship types (e.g., social entrepreneurship, small business management, and self-employment) is the collaborative experimentation and production of new products, assets, and their attributes, which are intricately related to advances in scientific and technological knowledge and the firm’s asset ownership rights. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 5-12 %8 02/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/520 %N 2 %1 Carleton University Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/520 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T TIM Lecture Series - 29 Lessons Learned in Entrepreneurship %A Wes Biggs %K entrepreneurship %K lessons learned %K startups %K strategy %K technology %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 46-48 %8 11/2012 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/629 %N 11 %1 Triacta Power Technologies Wes Biggs is a technology company veteran with over 30 years of experience in established technology companies such as Nortel, Mitel, and Newbridge plus several startups along the way. He has learned many lessons both as an engineer and as a founder/executive. Wes joined Triacta Power Technologies as the VP of Engineering & Operations in 2003 and is now President and CEO. Prior to joining Triacta, Wes was co-founder, President, and CEO of Meriton Networks. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/629 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T TIM Lecture Series - Born Global: A Pharmaceutical Startup Perspective %A Louis R. Lamontagne %K born global %K entrepreneurship %K globalization %K internationalization %K pharmaceutical %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 50-53 %8 09/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/609 %N 9 %1 LTL Global Innovations and Management Louis Lamontagne is the President and CEO of LTL Global Innovations and Management, Inc., which he founded in 2009. LTL Global Innovations and its wholly-owned subsidiary LTL Global BioEnergy Corp. are primarily focused on the development and commercialization of renewable and sustainable co-generation of combined heat and power (CHP) modular technologies using biomass as fuel. He was recently appointed as Global Practice Lead for the Life Sciences in Canada by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) and is interim CEO of Alztech, a USA based biopharma company focused on the development of novel therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease. Dr. Lamontagne formerly served on the Board of Canada’s Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) (and is a member of the Council’s Committee on Research Partnerships), the Board of Governors of Algonquin College, the Board of Directors of the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) representing the Ottawa Hospital, the Riverside Hospital, the Civic Hospital, the Children’s Hospital for Eastern Ontario, and the Heart Institute. He is also on a Board of Advisors for the Canada Science and Technology Museums Corporation, comprising of the Canada Food and Agriculture Museum, the Canada Aviation and Space Museum, and the Canada Science and Technology Museum. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/609 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T TIM Lecture Series - Growing a Global Company Anchored on Open Source Software %A Fred Dixon %K BigBlueButton %K entrepreneurship %K global company %K licenses %K open source %K startup %K web conferencing %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 38-40 %8 10/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/619 %N 10 %1 Blindside Networks Fred Dixon is CEO of Blindside Networks. He is a serial entrepreneur, having been CEO of two previous companies: Databeacon (acquired by Cognos in 2004) and OpenLava software. In 2003, he was selected as one of Ottawa's "Top 40 under 40" executives by the Ottawa Business Journal. In 1992, he earned a Bachelor of Mathematics from the University of Waterloo. He proudly wears his developer hat when communicating with other members in the BigBlueButton community. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/619 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T To Internationalize Rapidly from Inception: Crowdsource %A Elnaz Heidari %A Mohsen Akhavannia %A Nirosh Kannangara %K born global %K crowdsourcing %K entrepreneurship %K globalization %K internationalization %K startups %X Technology entrepreneurs continuously search for tools to accelerate the internationalization of their startups. For the purpose of internationalizing rapidly from inception, we propose that technology startups use crowdsourcing to internalize the tacit knowledge embodied in members of a crowd distributed across various geographies. For example, a technology startup can outsource to a large crowd the definition of a customer problem that occurs across various geographies, the development of the best solution to the problem, and the identification of attractive business expansion opportunities. In this article, we analyze how three small firms use crowdsourcing, discuss the benefits of crowdsourcing, and offer six recommendations to technology entrepreneurs interested in using crowdsourcing to rapidly internationalize their startups from inception. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 17-21 %8 10/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/615 %N 10 %1 Carleton University Elnaz Heidari holds a Master of Engineering degree in Technology Innovation Management (TIM) from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Her M.Eng project was based on crowdsourcing and open innovation. She also holds a B.Eng in Rubber Industrial Engineering. Her industrial experience includes working in the R&D department of Pars Vacuum Industries for two years. %2 Carleton University Mohsen Akhavannia is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He is a software engineer with expertise in system analysis and design. He has six years of international work experience including work on projects relating to banking and business-automation systems. %3 Carleton University Nirosh Kannangara is a graduate student in the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He holds a B.Eng. in Communications Engineering, also from Carleton University. Nirosh has two years of experience designing software in the fibre optics communication industry and currently works as a Photonics Software Designer at the Ciena Corporation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/615 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Towards More Case Study Research in Entrepreneurship %A Tom Duxbury %K case study research %K CSR %K entrepreneurship %K qualitative methods %K research methods %X Entrepreneurship as an emerging discipline has made good strides, but according to some, has fallen short of bringing its theory and literature up to the standards of others in the management sciences. Rich with the descriptive detail needed for insightful theory building in entrepreneurship, scholars have called for more case study research, particularly those incorporating non-retrospective and longitudinal observations. At the same time however, it has become rare to find such research published in A-level journals dedicated to entrepreneurship. A survey presented here of major entrepreneurship journals over the past six years revealed a publication rate of only 3% using the case study method. This presents a major impediment for developing fresh research in this field based upon the study of real cases. The author explores how the case study method has been applied to entrepreneurship research and provides recommendations for improved publication rates. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 9-17 %8 03/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/533 %N 3 %1 Sprott School of Business Tom Duxbury is Entrepreneur in Residence at Wesley Clover Technologies, a private equity incubator. He is currently completing his PhD in Management at the Sprott School of Business at Carleton University in Ottawa, where he teaches courses in entrepreneurship and innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/533 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T User Frustrations as Opportunities %A Michael Weiss %K entrepreneurship %K opportunity development %K user feedback %K user frustrations %K value propositions %X User frustrations are an excellent source of new product ideas. Starting with this observation, this article describes an approach that entrepreneurs can use to discover business opportunities. Opportunity discovery starts with a problem that the user has, but may not be able to articulate. User-centered design techniques can help elicit those latent needs. The entrepreneur should then try to understand how users are solving their problem today, before proposing a solution that draws on the unique skills and technical capabilities available to the entrepreneur. Finally, an in-depth understanding of the user allows the entrepreneur to hone in on the points of difference and resonance that are the foundation of a strong customer value proposition. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %V 2 %P 17-20 %8 04/2012 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/546 %N 4 %1 Carleton University Michael Weiss holds a faculty appointment in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, and he is a member of the Technology Innovation Management program. His research interests include open source business models, collective innovation, mashups and end-user development, product line engineering, and business patterns. Michael has published over 100 papers in conferences and journals. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/546 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T Using Social Media to Accelerate the Internationalization of Startups from Inception %A Tony Maltby %K born global %K entrepreneurship %K globalization %K internationalization %K rapid internationalization %K social media %K startups %K tacit knowledge %K technology startup %X A set of principles, processes, and tools that entrepreneurs can use to rapidly internationalize their technology startups from inception does not exist. This article discusses entrepreneurs’ use of online social media networks to rapidly internationalize their startups from inception. The article was inspired by how the founders of Dewak S.A. rapidly internationalized their technology startup. Dewak was founded by five unemployed Colombians in June 2008. Two years later, foreign sales comprised 95% of the firm’s revenue and provided the founders with full-time employment. Dewak’s only channel to market was via online social media networks. Recognizing that entrepreneurs can use social media to amplify their tacit knowledge and convert it into sellable products and services contributes to the development of a learning-based view of rapid internationalization from inception. The article provides entrepreneurs seeking to launch and grow global businesses with four recommendations that may save them time and money and increase the size of their addressable markets. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 22-26 %8 10/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/616 %N 10 %1 Carleton University Tony Maltby is a Master's student in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, where he is developing his latest entrepreneurial venture. His research interests relate to the application of gamified platforms, social media, and open source concepts to support the global business ecosystem. He is an experienced communicator with a multi-disciplinary perspective. He received his BA in Anthropology from Carleton University in 2002 where he studied the formation and interaction of online communities. From 2006 to 2011, Tony lived in China studying the certification process of the Chinese university education system. Having been the founder of several technology companies and an entrepreneur since very early in his career, Tony now has more than 25 years of entrepreneurial experience. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/616 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T What Technology Startups Must Get Right to Globalize Early and Rapidly %A Tony Bailetti %K born global %K effectuation logic %K entrepreneurs %K entrepreneurship %K global startups %K globalization %K gradual internationalization %K internalization %K international new ventures %K internationalization %K multinational %K rapid internationalization %K startups %X Upon or shortly after inception, growth-oriented technology startups must operate in a market that is global. Management teams and investors of technology startups can benefit from approaches and models that can help them operate in a global market early and rapidly. How well a technology startup addresses the realities of globalization will determine its success. A better understanding of what management teams and investors of technology startups must get right to globalize their startups is needed. This article is an attempt to meet this need. In this article, lessons that have been extracted from six literature streams and from information on 21 startups founded in 12 countries are used to identify the six elements that a startup must get right to globalize early and rapidly. These six elements are: i) Problem scope, ii) Stakeholders’ commitments, iii) Collaborative entrepreneurship, iv) Relational capital, v) Legitimacy, and vi) Global capability. The main contribution of this article is that it throws the spotlight on the need to develop prescriptive rules and practitioner-oriented models that can help a technology startup operate globally from an early stage. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 5-16 %8 10/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/614 %N 10 %1 Carleton University Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (TIM) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/614 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Editorial: Recent Research (November 2011) %A Chris McPhee %K business ecosystems %K entrepreneurship %K innovation %K open source %K policy %K research %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 3-3 %8 11/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/494 %N 2 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review and is in the Technology Innovation Management program at Carleton University in Ottawa. Chris received his BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, following which he worked in a variety of management, design, and content development roles on science education software projects in Canada and Scotland. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/494 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Entrepreneurial Orientation and Company Performance: Can the Academic Literature Guide Managers? %A R. Sandra Schillo %K entrepreneurial orientation %K entrepreneurship %X This article comments on the management implications of the various approaches to measuring entrepreneurial orientation (EO), and it discusses the implications of a range of empirical findings for management decisions. On the whole, the argument is that academic research needs to increase its understanding of the differences in empirical results between different studies. To date, the research mostly spells a small number of useful warnings, for example that the positive impact of EO may level off or turn negative beyond a certain point and that it may not have the anticipated positive effect in all circumstances. However, the academic research has yet to identify these circumstances to a level of specificity that could provide useful guidance to managers. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 20-25 %8 11/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/497 %N 2 %1 Innovation Impact Inc. Sandra Schillo is a researcher and consultant in the area of innovation and entrepreneurship. She is the Founding Editor of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, a publication founded to make academic literature on innovation and entrepreneurship accessible to policy professionals and researchers. She also is the President of Innovation Impact Inc., a company specializing in custom research and consulting services in the areas of innovation, science and technology policy, and entrepreneurship. Dr. Schillo is also on the Review Board of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Dr. Schillo obtained her Doctorate from the Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, University of Kiel, Germany, and received her Masters' degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Karlsruhe, Germany. She has extensive experience working with government departments and agencies on innovation and entrepreneurship. Dr. Schillo draws on both her practical and academic experience to ensure the relevance and quality of her work. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/497 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Fostering Student Entrepreneurship and University Spinoff Companies %A Tony Bailetti %K entrepreneurship %K spinoff %K student entrepreneur %K university %X A student spinoff company strives to transform knowledge acquired by students into an income-generating business. This article outlines how a university can increase the number of spinoff companies created by its student entrepreneurs. Student spinoff companies are of interest to all forward-thinking universities, particularly those that support research and teaching programs in the field of entrepreneurship. The spinoff companies provide tangible evidence that students acquire viable entrepreneurial skills while studying at the university. In addition, student spinoff companies contribute to regional economic development, commercialize knowledge that otherwise would go undeveloped, help universities attain and expand their core missions, and increase the return on the investments in university R&D. University policies developed specifically for student spinoff companies significantly affect the growth potential of such ventures. This article provides a model and a set of principles that universities can use to support and increase the number of student entrepreneurs at their institutions. The model and principles are grounded in research findings and practical experience. In addition, the article suggests that universities adopt a results-based management approach to plan and deploy initiatives to support student entrepreneurs. The approach is widely used by government agencies interested in increasing the outcomes from their investments. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 7-12 %8 10/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/485 %N 1 %1 Carleton University Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support international co-innovation, technical entrepreneurship, and regional economic development. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/485