%0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2017 %T Editorial: Collaboration (December 2017) %A Chris McPhee %K collaboration %K collaborative capability %K cooperation %K coworking %K education %K entrepreneurial commitment %K entrepreneurship %K industry %K interdisciplinarity %K SMEs %K startups %K university %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 7 %P 3-5 %8 12/2017 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1122 %N 12 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada. He has nearly 20 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1122 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2016 %T Assessing Cooperation between Industry and Research Infrastructure in Hungary %A Csaba Deák %A István Szabó %K assessment %K Hungary %K national infrastructure %K research infrastructure %K survey %K university %X In developed countries, a large share of R&D work is performed in universities, but the real significance of their contribution is larger, because they conduct most of the fundamental research. In this article, we examine one aspect of the academic sector that is visible to most outsiders, a field that requires usually the most resources as well: the research infrastructure. Hungary is currently in the process of forming its own National Infrastructure Roadmap. We present the results of a nation-wide survey carried out in 2014 by the National Innovation Office in support of the National Infrastructure Roadmap. The results represent a good starting point for developing measures and setting up goals for scientific fields. With the identification of research infrastructure usage by industry, this method might provide a best practice for other countries to undertake similar evaluations for their respective infrastructures. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 6 %P 13-20 %8 07/2016 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/1001 %N 7 %1 Corvinus University of Budapest Csaba Deák is Associate Professor at Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary, and Chancellor of the University of Miskolc, Hungary. Between 2012 and 2014 he was the Deputy Chairman of National Innovation Office of Hungary. He is Guest Lecturer at Universitatea Babes-Bolyai in Romania and Chairman of North Hungarian ICT Cluster. He has also worked as a management consultant for Human Telex Consulting Ltd. (Budapest) and several Hungarian and transnational companies. His main fields of research and training are innovation management, project management, and change Management. In 2001, he attained a doctorate (PhD) concerning change management and the re-engineering of projects in practice, and in 2010, he attained an academic habilitation concerning innovation management and project management. Csaba is a fellow of ISPIM (International Society for Professional Innovation Management). %2 National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Hungary) István Szabó is Head of Department at the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Hungary) and a governmental delegate for the European Strategic Forum for Research Infrastructures (ESFRI). He is responsible for activities related to research infrastructure in Hungary and acted as project leader of the National Research Infrastructure survey. He led the RDI Observatory in Hungary and constructed a database to support evidence-based policy making. He is also a PhD student at the University of Miskolc, Hungary. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1001 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in India (August 2014) %A Chris McPhee %A Kalyan Kumar Guin %K education %K entrepreneurship %K government support %K India %K innovation %K knowledge systems %K policy %K service innovation %K stakeholders %K startups %K uncertainty %K university %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 3-4 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/816 %N 8 %1 Technology Innovation Management Review Chris McPhee is Editor-in-Chief of the Technology Innovation Management Review. Chris holds an MASc degree in Technology Innovation Management from Carleton University in Ottawa and BScH and MSc degrees in Biology from Queen's University in Kingston. He has over 15 years of management, design, and content-development experience in Canada and Scotland, primarily in the science, health, and education sectors. As an advisor and editor, he helps entrepreneurs, executives, and researchers develop and express their ideas. %2 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Kalyan Kumar Guin is Dean and Professor at the Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He is an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur and Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi, India, and he is a Fellow of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. His teaching interests cover marketing and operations management, and he has a special interest in quantitative modelling of strategic issues in management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/816 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2014 %T Reviewing the Knowledge Systems of Innovation and the Associated Roles of Major Stakeholders in the Indian Context %A Punit Saurabh %A Prabha Bhola %A Kalyan Kumar Guin %K entrepreneurship %K government %K higher-education institutions %K industry %K innovation ecosystem %K innovation system %K knowledge systems %K models %K stakeholders %K university %X In this article, we review various models of knowledge systems and discusses the relationships between various component stakeholders of innovation, namely higher-education institutions, industry, and government. The article uses India as a case study to examine new challenges and opportunities facing its innovation ecosystem. Within this context, we review existing models of knowledge systems through an innovative representation exemplifying the knowledge landscape and the model positioning. We argue for a reinforcing role of major stakeholders in the proliferation of innovation and entrepreneurship, and the need to promote healthy interactions between them. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 4 %P 36-45 %8 08/2014 %G eng %U http://timreview.ca/article/821 %N 8 %1 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Punit Saurabh recently completed his PhD in the domain of innovation and entrepreneurship development from the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He has hands-on experience in managing government innovation and entrepreneurship funding programs and is also involved with the academic aspects of entrepreneurship. %2 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Prabha Bhola is an Assistant Professor in the Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India, where she also received her PhD in Poverty Economics. She has wide range of teaching experience at different institutions. %3 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Kalyan Kumar Guin is Dean and Professor at the Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. He is an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur and Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi, India, and he is a Fellow of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. His teaching interests cover marketing and operations management, and he has a special interest in quantitative modelling of strategic issues in management. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/821 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2012 %T From Business Administration to Business Creation: The Case of the Kalevala Global Business Creation School %A Marko Seppä %K business creation %K business school %K co-creation %K entrepreneurship %K knowledge investing %K Open innovation %K university %X Are there any businesses left to administer? The question is of course rhetorical and aimed at underscoring how several societies are more severely in need of creators of new businesses than managers of established ones. And yet, nearly all universities only produce masters of business administration, at best. Apart from theoretical research about business creation, and the education of masters of such research, universities are generally not equipped to produce knowledge for business creation or to produce masters of business creation. This conceptual article calls for a new, complementary approach to research and education, around the theme of global business creation. Due to the limitations and restrictions related to the traditions and practices of the science of business administration, where the means justify the ends, a new exploratory field coined as the “Art of Business Creation,” where the end justifies the means, is being explored for some inspiration. For a concrete solution, the concept of a globally distributed, enterprise-centric, entrepreneurial-faculty-driven, open-innovation-based, and social-media-empowered university entity is depicted in this article. It is a new-generation private-public-partnership and “Living Lab 2.0” referred to as Kalevala Global Business Creation School. The conceptualization draws from observations and action research during the Global Venture Lab Finland experiment at the University of Jyväskylä from 2007 to 2011. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 2 %P 6-11 %8 06/2012 %U http://timreview.ca/article/562 %N 6 %1 Global Enabler Marko Seppä is “serial co-creator” and knowledge investor specialized in growth venture creation. He was apprenticed as venture capitalist by Panostaja Group, in Finland in the late 1980s. Since 1991, he has led the co-creation of three enabler organizations: FVC, a pioneering venture capital firm for the emerging markets of Russia and the Baltic countries; eBRC, an ambitious e-business research center for a local pilot of eEurope; and GVL Finland, a global venture lab experiment for University Alliance Finland. He holds an MSc in Management from the University of Tampere and a PhD in Corporate Strategy from the University of Jyväskylä. He is currently engaged in the co-creation of Global Enabler: A community, platform and factory of enablers of global business creation for problems worth solving. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/562 %0 Journal Article %J Technology Innovation Management Review %D 2011 %T Fostering Student Entrepreneurship and University Spinoff Companies %A Tony Bailetti %K entrepreneurship %K spinoff %K student entrepreneur %K university %X A student spinoff company strives to transform knowledge acquired by students into an income-generating business. This article outlines how a university can increase the number of spinoff companies created by its student entrepreneurs. Student spinoff companies are of interest to all forward-thinking universities, particularly those that support research and teaching programs in the field of entrepreneurship. The spinoff companies provide tangible evidence that students acquire viable entrepreneurial skills while studying at the university. In addition, student spinoff companies contribute to regional economic development, commercialize knowledge that otherwise would go undeveloped, help universities attain and expand their core missions, and increase the return on the investments in university R&D. University policies developed specifically for student spinoff companies significantly affect the growth potential of such ventures. This article provides a model and a set of principles that universities can use to support and increase the number of student entrepreneurs at their institutions. The model and principles are grounded in research findings and practical experience. In addition, the article suggests that universities adopt a results-based management approach to plan and deploy initiatives to support student entrepreneurs. The approach is widely used by government agencies interested in increasing the outcomes from their investments. %B Technology Innovation Management Review %I Talent First Network %C Ottawa %V 1 %P 7-12 %8 10/2011 %U http://timreview.ca/article/485 %N 1 %1 Carleton University Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support international co-innovation, technical entrepreneurship, and regional economic development. %R http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/485