{\rtf1\ansi\deff0\deftab360

{\fonttbl
{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Arial}
{\f1\froman\fcharset0 Times New Roman}
{\f2\fswiss\fcharset0 Verdana}
{\f3\froman\fcharset2 Symbol}
}

{\colortbl;
\red0\green0\blue0;
}

{\info
{\author Biblio 7.x}{\operator }{\title Biblio RTF Export}}

\f1\fs24
\paperw11907\paperh16839
\pgncont\pgndec\pgnstarts1\pgnrestart
Hansen, A. Vorre, Fuglsang, L., Liefooghe, C., Rubalcaba, L., Gago, D., Haug, I. Mergel & N., et al. 2021. Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: insights from a European case study. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 47-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1464\par \par Tanev, S., & Sandstrom, G. 2020. Editorial: Insights (November 2020). Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(11): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1404\par \par Schrevel, S., Slager, M., & de Vlugt, E. 2020. ?I Stood By and Watched?:  An Autoethnography of Stakeholder Participation in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(11): 19-30. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1400\par \par McPhee, C., St\'e5hlbr\'f6st, A., Habibipour, A., Runardotter, M., & Chron\'e9er, D. 2019. Editorial: Living Labs (March 2019). Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1220\par \par Schuurman, D., Herregodts, A. - L., Georges, A., & Rits, O. 2019. Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 63-73. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1225\par \par McPhee, C. 2018. Editorial: Innovation Management (July 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(7): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1166\par \par McPhee, C. 2018. Editorial: Insights (June 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(6): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1160\par \par McPhee, C. 2018. Editorial: Insights (May 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1154\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2018. Editorial: Living Labs (December 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1200\par \par Imset, M., Haavardtun, P., & Tannum, M. Stian. 2018. Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 26-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1203\par \par Coorevits, L., Georges, A., & Schuurman, D. 2018. A Framework for Field Testing in Living Lab Innovation Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 40-50. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1204\par \par Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Habib, C. 2018. Key Constructs and a Definition of Living Labs as Innovation Platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 51-62. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1205\par \par Steen, K., & van Bueren, E. 2017. The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7): 21-33. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1088\par \par McPhee, C. 2017. Editorial: 10th Anniversary Issue (July 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1086\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Schuurman, D., & Ballon, P. 2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (February 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1052\par \par McPhee, C., Schuurman, D., Ballon, P., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (January 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1044\par \par McPhee, C. 2017. Editorial: Insights (November 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1115\par \par Coenen, T., & Robijt, S. 2017. Heading for a FALL: A Framework for Agile Living Lab Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 37-43. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1048\par \par Schuurman, D., & T\'f5nurist, P. 2017. Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045\par \par D?Hauwers, R., Herregodts, A. - L., Georges, A., Coorevits, L., Schuurman, D., Rits, O., et al. 2017. Overcoming Barriers to Experimentation in Business-to-Business Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 20-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1054\par \par McPhee, C., Guimont, D., & Lapointe, D. 2016. Editorial: Innovation in Tourism (November 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(11): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1029\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2016. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (January 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/955\par \par McPhee, C., Tukiainen, T., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2016. Editorial: Smart Cities and Regions (December 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1037\par \par Guimont, D., & Lapointe, D. 2016. Empowering Local Tourism Providers to Innovate through a Living Lab Process: Does Scale Matter?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(11): 18-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1031\par \par Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2016. The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956\par \par McPhee, C., Galbraith, B., & Noori, N. 2015. Editorial: Innovation Tools and Techniques (March 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/876\par \par McPhee, C. 2015. Editorial: Insights (September 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/924\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2015. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (December 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/947\par \par McPhee, C., Tukiainen, T., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2015. Editorial: Smart Cities and Regions (October 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/931\par \par Rits, O., Schuurman, D., & Ballon, P. 2015. Exploring the Benefits of Integrating Business Model Research within Living Lab Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 19-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/949\par \par Katzy, B. R., & B\'fccker, C. 2015. The Organization of Living Labs: Coordinating Activities for Regional Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 23-28. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/927\par \par Leminen, S. 2015. Q&A. What Are Living Labs?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 29-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/928\par \par McPhee, C., Rajala, R., Toivonen, M., & Westerlund, M. 2014. Editorial: Service and Innovation (May 2014). Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(5): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/788\par \par Gray, M., Mangyoku, M., Serra, A., S\'e1nchez, L., & Aragall, F. 2014. Integrating Design for All in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(5): 50-59. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/793\par \par McPhee, C., Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2013. Editorial: Living Labs and Crowdsourcing (December 2013). Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/747\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2013. Editorial: Living Labs (November 2013). Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/739\par \par Femen\'edas, P., & Hagbert, P. 2013. The Habitation Lab: Using a Design Approach to Foster Innovation for Sustainable Living. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 15-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/741\par \par Hakkarainen, L., & Hyysalo, S. 2013. How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 16-22. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/749\par \par Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2013. Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 28-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/743\par \par Katzy, B. 2012. Designing Viable Business Models for Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 19-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/604\par \par McPhee, C., Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2012. Editorial: Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/601\par \par Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nystr\'f6m, A. - G. 2012. Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 6-11. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602\par \par Schaffers, H., & Turkama, P. 2012. Living Labs for Cross-Border Systemic Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 25-30. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/605\par \par Almirall, E., Lee, M., & Wareham, J. 2012. Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 12-18. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/603\par \par Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. 2012. Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 31-38. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/606\par \par }