{\rtf1\ansi\deff0\deftab360

{\fonttbl
{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Arial}
{\f1\froman\fcharset0 Times New Roman}
{\f2\fswiss\fcharset0 Verdana}
{\f3\froman\fcharset2 Symbol}
}

{\colortbl;
\red0\green0\blue0;
}

{\info
{\author Biblio 7.x}{\operator }{\title Biblio RTF Export}}

\f1\fs24
\paperw11907\paperh16839
\pgncont\pgndec\pgnstarts1\pgnrestart
De Vita, K., & De Vita, R. 2021. Expect the Unexpected: Investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 6-20. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1461\par \par Hansen, A. Vorre, Fuglsang, L., Liefooghe, C., Rubalcaba, L., Gago, D., Haug, I. Mergel & N., et al. 2021. Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: insights from a European case study. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 47-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1464\par \par Huikkola, T., & Kohtam\'e4ki, M. 2020. Agile New Solution Development in Manufacturing Companies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(3): 16-24\par \par Haukipuro, L., V\'e4in\'e4m\'f6, S., Arhippainen, L., & Ojala, T. 2019. Applying a Living Lab Approach Within an eHealth Accelerator. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 6-19. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1221\par \par McPhee, C., St\'e5hlbr\'f6st, A., Habibipour, A., Runardotter, M., & Chron\'e9er, D. 2019. Editorial: Living Labs (March 2019). Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1220\par \par von Geibler, J., Piwowar, J., & Greven, A. 2019. The SDG-Check: Guiding Open Innovation towards Sustainable Development Goals. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 20-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1222\par \par McPhee, C., Schillo, R. S., Earl, L., & Kinder, J. 2018. Editorial: Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries (February 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(2): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1134\par \par McPhee, C. 2018. Editorial: Insights (March 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(3): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1141\par \par McPhee, C. 2018. Editorial: Insights (October 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(10): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1188\par \par Imset, M., Haavardtun, P., & Tannum, M. Stian. 2018. Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 26-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1203\par \par Thomas, E. 2018. From Closed to Open Innovation in Emerging Economies: Evidence from the Chemical Industry in Brazil. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(3): 26-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1144\par \par Brattstr\'f6m, A. 2018. How to Deal With and Repair Broken Trust in an R&D Partnership. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(9): 4-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1182\par \par Schuurman, D., & Protic, S. M. 2018. Living Labs versus Lean Startups: An Empirical Investigation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1201\par \par De Maeijer, E., Van Hout, T., Weggeman, M., & Post, G. 2018. Tread Carefully: Managing Identities and Expectations in High-Tech Industry?Academia Collaborations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(10): 29-43. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1191\par \par Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Categorization of Innovation Tools in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 15-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1046\par \par McPhee, C., Schuurman, D., Ballon, P., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (January 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1044\par \par McPhee, C. 2017. Editorial: Insights (November 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1115\par \par Schuurman, D., & T\'f5nurist, P. 2017. Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045\par \par Hossain, M., & Lassen, A. Heidemann. 2017. Q&A. How Do Digital Platforms for Ideas, Technologies, and Knowledge Transfer Act as Enablers for Digital Transformation?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(9): 55-60. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1106\par \par Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Towards Third-Generation Living Lab Networks in Cities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 21-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1118\par \par McPhee, C., & Raval, D. 2016. Editorial: Entrepreneurial India (May 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(5): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/984\par \par McPhee, C. 2016. Editorial: Insights (July 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/999\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2016. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (January 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/955\par \par McPhee, C. 2016. Editorial: Managing Innovation (April 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(4): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/976\par \par McPhee, C., Tukiainen, T., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2016. Editorial: Smart Cities and Regions (December 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1037\par \par Georges, A., Schuurman, D., & Vervoort, K. 2016. Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959\par \par Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2016. The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956\par \par Tripathi, S. S. 2016. Open Innovation in Indian Organizations: Types of Collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(5): 15-23. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/987\par \par Le\'f3n, G., & Mart\'ednez, R. 2016. Q&A. How Can a University Drive an Open Innovation Ecosystem?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7): 48-51. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1004\par \par Ullrich, A., & Vladova, G. 2016. Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(4): 34-40. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/980\par \par Tukiainen, T., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2015. Cities as Collaborative Innovation Platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10): 16-23. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/933\par \par McPhee, C. 2015. Editorial: 100th Issue (November 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(11): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/939\par \par McPhee, C. 2015. Editorial: Insights (September 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/924\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2015. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (December 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/947\par \par McPhee, C., Tukiainen, T., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2015. Editorial: Smart Cities and Regions (October 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/931\par \par Leminen, S., Turunen, T., & Westerlund, M. 2015. The Grey Areas Between Open and Closed in Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 6-18. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/948\par \par Borch, O. Jarl, & Solesvik, M. Z. 2015. Innovation on the Open Sea: Examining Competence Transfer and Open Innovation in the Design of Offshore Vessels. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 17-22. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/926\par \par Valkokari, K. 2015. Q&A. In the Innovation Game, Why Do So Many Companies Stay on the Sidelines?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(11): 35-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/944\par \par Leminen, S. 2015. Q&A. What Are Living Labs?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 29-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/928\par \par Saldanha, F. Prado, Cohendet, P., & Pozzebon, M. 2014. Challenging the Stage-Gate Model in Crowdsourcing: The Case of Fiat Mio in Brazil. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(9): 28-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/829\par \par Bank, J., & Raza, A. 2014. Collaborative Idea Management: A Driver of Continuous Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(2): 11-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/764\par \par McPhee, C. 2014. Editorial: Seeking Solutions (February 2014). Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(2): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/762\par \par Leminen, S. 2013. Coordination and Participation in Living Lab Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 5-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/740\par \par McPhee, C., Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2013. Editorial: Living Labs and Crowdsourcing (December 2013). Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/747\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2013. Editorial: Living Labs (November 2013). Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/739\par \par McPhee, C., & Deutsch, C. 2013. Editorial: Local Open Innovation (March 2013). Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(3): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/663\par \par McPhee, C., & Segers, J. - P. 2013. Editorial: Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship (April 2013). Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(4): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/672\par \par Noori, N., & Weiss, M. 2013. Going Open: Does it Mean Giving Away Control?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(1): 27-31. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/647\par \par Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2013. Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748\par \par Iakovleva, T. 2013. Open Innovation at the Root of Entrepreneurial Strategy: A Case from the Norwegian Oil Industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(4): 17-22. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/675\par \par Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2013. Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 28-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/743\par \par Solesvik, M. Z., & Gulbrandsen, M. 2013. Partner Selection for Open Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(4): 11-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/674\par \par Davenport, S., Cummings, S., Daellenbach, U., & Campbell, C. 2013. Problemsourcing: Local Open Innovation for R&D Organizations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(3): 14-20. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/665\par \par Berger Masson, A. 2013. Quebec Seeks Solutions: An Economic Development Agency's Role in Local Open Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(3): 27-32. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/667\par \par Vanhaverbeke, W. 2013. Rethinking Open Innovation Beyond the Innovation Funnel. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(4): 6-10. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/673\par \par Deutsch, C. 2013. The Seeking Solutions Approach: Solving Challenging Business Problems with Local Open Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(3): 6-13. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/664\par \par Segers, J. - P. 2013. Strategic Partnerships and Open Innovation in the Biotechnology Industry in Belgium. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(4): 23-28. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/676\par \par Deutsch, C., & Dancause, P. 2013. TIM Lecture Series ? Local Open Innovation and the Seeking Solutions Approach. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(3): 42-46. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/669\par \par Deschamps, I., Macedo, M. G., & Eve-Levesque, C. 2013. University-SME Collaboration and Open Innovation: Intellectual-Property Management Tools and the Roles of Intermediaries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(3): 33-41. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/668\par \par McPhee, C., Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2012. Editorial: Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/601\par \par Sepp\'e4, M. 2012. From Business Administration to Business Creation: The Case of the Kalevala Global Business Creation School. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(6): 6-11. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/562\par \par Lindman, J., & Rajala, R. 2012. How Open Source Has Changed the Software Industry: Perspectives from Open Source Entrepreneurs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(1): 5-11. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/510\par \par Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nystr\'f6m, A. - G. 2012. Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 6-11. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602\par \par Almirall, E., Lee, M., & Wareham, J. 2012. Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 12-18. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/603\par \par Niitamo, V. - P., Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2012. A Small-Firm Perspective on the Benefits of Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 44-49. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/608\par \par Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. 2012. Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 31-38. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/606\par \par Tanev, S., Knudsen, M. P., Bisgaard, T., & Thomsen, M. S. 2011. Innovation Policy Development and the Emergence of New Innovation Paradigms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(2): 14-19. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/496\par \par Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2011. Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1): 19-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/489\par \par Cohendet, P., & P\'e9nin, J. 2011. Patents to Exclude vs. Include: Rethinking the Management of Intellectual Property Rights in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(3): 12-17. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/502\par \par }