{\rtf1\ansi\deff0\deftab360

{\fonttbl
{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Arial}
{\f1\froman\fcharset0 Times New Roman}
{\f2\fswiss\fcharset0 Verdana}
{\f3\froman\fcharset2 Symbol}
}

{\colortbl;
\red0\green0\blue0;
}

{\info
{\author Biblio 7.x}{\operator }{\title Biblio RTF Export}}

\f1\fs24
\paperw11907\paperh16839
\pgncont\pgndec\pgnstarts1\pgnrestart
De Vita, K., & De Vita, R. 2021. Expect the Unexpected: Investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 6-20. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1461\par \par Hansen, A. Vorre, Fuglsang, L., Liefooghe, C., Rubalcaba, L., Gago, D., Haug, I. Mergel & N., et al. 2021. Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: insights from a European case study. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 47-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1464\par \par Huang, J. Hong, & Thomas, E. 2021. A Review of Living Lab Research and Methods for User Involvement. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 88-107. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1467\par \par da Silva, T. Filipe Per, & Marques, J. Paulo Coel. 2020. Human-Centered Design for Collaborative Innovation in Knowledge-based Economies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(9). http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1385\par \par Jussila, J., Raitanen, J., Partanen, A., Tuomela, V., Siipola, V., & Kunnari, I. 2020. Rapid Product Development in University-Industry Collaboration: Case Study of a Smart Design Project. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(3): 49-59. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1336\par \par Lindberg, M., Hallencreutz, D., & Tengqvist, A. 2019. Bridging Participatory Policy Trends and Research Traditions through Social Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(4): 27-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1231\par \par McPhee, C. 2018. Editorial: Insights (May 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1154\par \par Haukipuro, L., V\'e4in\'e4m\'f6, S., & Hyrk\'e4s, P. 2018. Innovation Instruments to Co-Create Needs-Based Solutions in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 22-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1156\par \par Valgeirsdottir, D., & Onarheim, B. 2017. Realistic Creativity Training for Innovation Practitioners: The Know?Recognize?React Model. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(6): 5-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1080\par \par Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Towards Third-Generation Living Lab Networks in Cities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 21-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1118\par \par Nystr\'f6m, A. - G., Mustonen, M., & Yrj\'f6l\'e4, S. 2016. Co-Creating User Stories: A Tool for Making Sense of Business Opportunities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8): 33-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1009\par \par Weiss, M. 2016. Crowdsourcing Literature Reviews in New Domains. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(2): 5-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/963\par \par Artto, K., Kyr\'f6, R., Ahola, T., Peltokorpi, A., & Sandqvist, K. 2016. The Cuckoo?s Nest Approach for Co-Creating Business Ecosystems in Smart Cities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(12): 26-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1039\par \par McPhee, C., Guimont, D., & Lapointe, D. 2016. Editorial: Innovation in Tourism (November 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(11): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1029\par \par McPhee, C. 2016. Editorial: Insights (August 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1006\par \par Gr\'e8zes, V., Lehmann, B. Girod, Schnyder, M., & Perruchoud, A. 2016. A Process for Co-Creating Shared Value with the Crowd: Tourism Case Studies from a Regional Innovation System in Western Switzerland. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(11): 32-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1033\par \par Franz, Y., Tausz, K., & Thiel, S. - K. 2015. Contextuality and Co-Creation Matter: A Qualitative Case Study Comparison of Living Lab Concepts in Urban Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 48-55. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/952\par \par Katzy, B. R., & B\'fccker, C. 2015. The Organization of Living Labs: Coordinating Activities for Regional Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 23-28. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/927\par \par Valkokari, K. 2015. Q&A. In the Innovation Game, Why Do So Many Companies Stay on the Sidelines?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(11): 35-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/944\par \par Tanev, S., & Frederiksen, M. Harbo. 2014. Generative Innovation Practices, Customer Creativity, and the Adoption of New Technology Products. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(2): 5-10. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/763\par \par Gray, M., Mangyoku, M., Serra, A., S\'e1nchez, L., & Aragall, F. 2014. Integrating Design for All in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(5): 50-59. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/793\par \par Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2013. Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748\par \par Rajala, A., Westerlund, M., Murtonen, M., & Starck, K. 2013. Servitization in a Security Business: Changing the Logic of Value Creation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(8): 65-72. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/718\par \par Tanev, S. 2013. TIM Lecture Series ? Technology Adoption by Design: Insights for Entrepreneurs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 39-41. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/752\par \par Katzy, B. 2012. Designing Viable Business Models for Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 19-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/604\par \par McPhee, C., Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. 2012. Editorial: Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/601\par \par Sepp\'e4, M. 2012. From Business Administration to Business Creation: The Case of the Kalevala Global Business Creation School. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(6): 6-11. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/562\par \par Mulder, I. 2012. Living Labbing the Rotterdam Way: Co-Creation as an Enabler for Urban Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 39-43. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/607\par \par Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nystr\'f6m, A. - G. 2012. Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 6-11. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602\par \par }