{\rtf1\ansi\deff0\deftab360

{\fonttbl
{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Arial}
{\f1\froman\fcharset0 Times New Roman}
{\f2\fswiss\fcharset0 Verdana}
{\f3\froman\fcharset2 Symbol}
}

{\colortbl;
\red0\green0\blue0;
}

{\info
{\author Biblio 7.x}{\operator }{\title Biblio RTF Export}}

\f1\fs24
\paperw11907\paperh16839
\pgncont\pgndec\pgnstarts1\pgnrestart
Leminen, S., & Schuurman, D. 2021. Editorial: Living Labs (9/10, 2021). Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1460\par \par Schuurman, D., Herregodts, A. - L., Georges, A., & Rits, O. 2019. Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 63-73. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1225\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2018. Editorial: Living Labs (December 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1200\par \par Coorevits, L., Georges, A., & Schuurman, D. 2018. A Framework for Field Testing in Living Lab Innovation Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 40-50. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1204\par \par Schuurman, D., & Protic, S. M. 2018. Living Labs versus Lean Startups: An Empirical Investigation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1201\par \par Habibipour, A., Georges, A., St\'e5hlbr\'f6st, A., Schuurman, D., & Bergvall-K\'e5reborn, B. 2018. A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Drop-Out Behaviour in Living Lab Field Tests. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 5-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1155\par \par Logghe, S., & Schuurman, D. 2017. Action Research as a Framework to Evaluate the Operations of a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 35-41. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1056\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Schuurman, D., & Ballon, P. 2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (February 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1052\par \par McPhee, C., Schuurman, D., Ballon, P., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (January 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1044\par \par Schuurman, D., & T\'f5nurist, P. 2017. Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045\par \par D?Hauwers, R., Herregodts, A. - L., Georges, A., Coorevits, L., Schuurman, D., Rits, O., et al. 2017. Overcoming Barriers to Experimentation in Business-to-Business Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 20-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1054\par \par Schuurman, D., De Vocht, S., De Cleyn, S., & Herregodts, A. - L. 2017. A Structured Approach to Academic Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from imec?s 101 Programme. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8): 5-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1095\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2016. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (January 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/955\par \par Georges, A., Schuurman, D., & Vervoort, K. 2016. Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959\par \par Baccarne, B., Logghe, S., Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. 2016. Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3): 22-30. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/972\par \par Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2016. The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956\par \par McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2015. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (December 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/947\par \par Rits, O., Schuurman, D., & Ballon, P. 2015. Exploring the Benefits of Integrating Business Model Research within Living Lab Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 19-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/949\par \par Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2013. Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748\par \par Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. 2013. Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 28-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/743\par \par Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. 2012. Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 31-38. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/606\par \par }