01233nas a2200193   4500008004100000022001400041245005000055210004900105260004200154300001300196490000700209520067800216653002600894653003000920653001500950653002300965100002100988856003001009       2022                        eng d  a1927-032100aCan Blockchain Improve Healthcare Management?0 aCan Blockchain Improve Healthcare Management  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2022  a220102030 v123 aThe paper sets out to examine the relevance of blockchain technology for healthcare management in general, and specifically for consumer medical electronics and connected portable devices. After considering the pivotal role of electronic health records in the first part of the paper, we then analyze the holistic transformative role of blockchain for healthcare data management, illustrated by a set of emerging use cases. Following that, we address the fast-growing segment of consumer medical electronics and the Internet of Medical Things. Finally, we highlight the digital community-building role of public private partnerships for emerging healthcare strategy design.10aBlockchain Technology10aElectronic Health Records10ahealthcare10aInternet of Things1 aPilkington, Marc  utimreview.ca/article/148002253nas a2200313   4500008004100000022001400041245014100055210006900196260004200265300001000307490000700317520124900324653002801573653001501601653002001616653002101636653003401657653002501691653002301716653002301739653002501762653002301787653002101810653001901831653002001850653001601870100002301886856003001909       2021                        eng d  a1927-032100aDistributed Ledger Technologies and Social Machines: How to “smartify” the economy with blockchain-based digital extension services?0 aDistributed Ledger Technologies and Social Machines How to smart  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2021  a42-570 v113 aThis paper examines the broad impact of digitalization on economic development. More specifically, it addresses the computer science-derived notion of "social machines", along with the invention of distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) (or blockchain), as potential signposts on the pathway to "smart(er) digital economies". The paper investigates blockchain-based ecosystems as examples of social machines that assist in economic "smartification" and development. It looks at distributed ledger-based communities (DLCs) that provide examples of functioning social machines for a variety of business and personal network communications purposes. It then analyses the scaleup of DLT-based social machines by comparison with "extension services", largely in education and agriculture, which are currently undergoing processes of digitalization. Overall, this conceptual study examines the general horizons and potential impact of blockchain and social machines on the provision of online products and services, across a range of sectors and industries. The paper offers interpretative assistance to managers, entrepreneurs, technology experts, and academics with lingering questions about blockchain in and for business and economic development.10aartificial intelligence10ablockchain10adigital economy10adigital platform10adistributed ledger technology10aeconomic development10aextension services10aextension thinking10ainnovation diffusion10aInternet of Things10aledger community10asmartification10asocial machines10aweb science1 aSandstrom, Gregory  utimreview.ca/article/144900783nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245003700055210003400092260004200126300000800168490000600176653001400182653001300196653002000209653002200229653001500251653002300266653001500289653002500304653002300329653002000352653002400372653001900396653002300415100001800438856003700456       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (March 2018)0 aEditorial Insights March 2018  aOttawabTalent First Networkc03/2018  a3-40 v810aanalytics10abig data10abusiness models10aclosed innovation10aecosystems10aemerging economies10ainnovation10ainternationalization10aInternet of Things10aOpen innovation10atechnology startups10avalue creation10avalue propositions1 aMcPhee, Chris  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/114101492nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260004200214300000900256490000600265520080700271653001901078653001401097653002301111653000901134653002201143100002101165700001901186700002001205856003701225       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aValue Creation in the Internet of Things: Mapping Business Models and Ecosystem Roles0 aValue Creation in the Internet of Things Mapping Business Models  aOttawabTalent First Networkc03/2018  a5-150 v83 aThe increasing connectivity provided by the Internet of Things (IoT) supports novel business opportunities for actors in overlapping service systems. Therefore, the co-creative nature of IoT business needs to be further studied. This article reports an empirical study on a European IoT initiative. It contributes to the understudied area of IoT ecosystem dynamics by describing different actor roles and activities in the IoT use cases, and their implications for value creation in IoT ecosystems. Our findings show how IoT ecosystem actors may take the roles of ideator, designer, or intermediary in different IoT design layers, and we recommend this perspective to better understand and describe ecosystem business models. We also discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of our findings.10abusiness model10aecosystem10aInternet of Things10arole10avalue co-creation1 aIkävalko, Heini1 aTurkama, Petra1 aSmedlund, Anssi  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/114201819nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245007300055210006900128260004200197300001000239490000600249520116600255653001301421653001801434653001801452653002301470653000801493653001201501653001801513100002101531856003701552       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aBig Data and Individual Privacy in the Age of the Internet of Things0 aBig Data and Individual Privacy in the Age of the Internet of Th  aOttawabTalent First Networkc04/2017  a12-240 v73 aThe availability of “big data” and “smart” products are credited with advancing solutions to complex problems in medicine, transportation, and education, among others. However, with big data comes big responsibility. The collection, storage, sharing, and analysis of data are far outpacing individual privacy protections, whether technological or legislative. The Internet of Things (IoT), with its promise to create networks of networks, will magnify individual data privacy threats. Recent data breaches, exposing the personal information of millions of users, provide insight into the vulnerability of personal data. Although seemingly expansive, there are core individual privacy issues that are central to current big data breaches and anticipated IoT threats. This article examines both big data and the IoT using examples of data privacy breaches to illustrate the impact of individual data loss. Furthermore, the article examines the complexity of tackling technological and legislative challenges in protecting individual privacy. It concludes by summarizing these issues in terms of the future implications of the IoT and the loss of privacy. 10abig data10acybersecurity10adata breaches10aInternet of Things10aIOT10aprivacy10asmart devices1 aAdams, Mackenzie  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/106700919nas a2200349   4500008004100000022001400041245004200055210003900097260004200136300000800178490000600186653002200192653001500214653001300229653001800242653001600260653002100276653002300297653000800320653001600328653002000344653001200364653001400376653002000390653002500410653001800435653002200453653002000475100001800495700001900513856003700532       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Cybersecurity (April 2017)0 aEditorial Cybersecurity April 2017  aOttawabTalent First Networkc04/2017  a3-40 v710aanomaly detection10aautomation10abig data10acybersecurity10aexploration10aHypponen’s law10aInternet of Things10aIOT10alegislation10amedical devices10aprivacy10areal time10arisk assessment10asecurity engineering10asmart devices10avalue proposition10avulnerabilities1 aMcPhee, Chris1 aWeiss, Michael  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/106500693nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245003600055210003300091260004200124300000800166490000600174653002900180653001500209653001800224653002100242653003800263653002300301653001900324653001300343653004000356100001800396856003700414       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (June 2017)0 aEditorial Insights June 2017  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2017  a3-40 v710acompetitive intelligence10acreativity10acybersecurity10aentrepreneurship10ainternal communication management10aInternet of Things10aservice design10atraining10auniversity–industry collaboration1 aMcPhee, Chris  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/107900843nas a2200313   4500008004100000022001400041245004000055210003700095260004200132300000800174490000600182653002400188653002000212653001100232653001800243653002100261653003300282653001700315653002300332653000800355653001600363653001600379653001400395653002000409653002200429653002300451100001800474856003700492       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (November 2017)0 aEditorial Insights November 2017  aOttawabTalent First Networkc11/2017  a3-40 v710aacademic publishing10abusiness models10acities10acollaboration10aentrepreneurship10afourth industrial revolution10aIndustry 4.010aInternet of Things10aIOT10aliving labs10aopen access10aopen data10aOpen innovation10asocial innovation10avalue propositions1 aMcPhee, Chris  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/111501727nas a2200217   4500008004100000022001400041245008500055210006900140260004200209300001000251490000600261520105800267653003301325653001701358653002301375653002201398100001801420700001701438700001701455856003701472       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aThe Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective0 aFourth Industrial Revolution Industry 40 A Social Innovation Per  aOttawabTalent First Networkc11/2017  a12-200 v73 aThe rapid pace of technological developments played a key role in the previous industrial revolutions. However, the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) and its embedded technology diffusion progress is expected to grow exponentially in terms of technical change and socioeconomic impact. Therefore, coping with such transformation require a holistic approach that encompasses innovative and sustainable system solutions and not just technological ones. In this article, we propose a framework that can facilitate the interaction between technological and social innovation to continuously come up with proactive, and hence timely, sustainable strategies. These strategies can leverage economic rewards, enrich society at large, and protect the environment. The new forthcoming opportunities that will be generated through the next industrial wave are gigantic at all levels. However, the readiness for such revolutionary conversion require coupling the forces of technological innovation and social innovation under the sustainability umbrella. 10afourth industrial revolution10aIndustry 4.010aInternet of Things10asocial innovation1 aMorrar, Rabeh1 aArman, Husam1 aMousa, Saeed  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/111701737nas a2200277   4500008004100000022001400041245010200055210006900157260004200226300000900268490000600277520092300283653001401206653001801220653002101238653002301259653000801282653001601290653001801306653002501324653001801349653001801367100002001385700001701405856003701422       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aThe Internet of (Vulnerable) Things: On Hypponen's Law, Security Engineering, and IoT Legislation0 aInternet of Vulnerable Things On Hypponens Law Security Engineer  aOttawabTalent First Networkc04/2017  a5-110 v73 aThe Internet of Things (IoT) and the resulting network-connectedness of everyday objects and appliances in our lives bring not only new features and possibilities, but also significant security concerns. These security concerns have resulted in vulnerabilities ranging from those limited in effect to a single device to vulnerabilities that have enabled IoT-based botnets to take over hundreds of thousands of devices to be used for illegal purposes. This article discusses the vulnerable nature of the IoT – as symbolized by Hypponen’s law – and the parts both manufacturers and consumers play in these vulnerabilities. This article makes the case for the importance of security engineering for IoT manufacturers, highlights some significant issues to help consumers address these vulnerabilities, and argues for legislation as perhaps the only reliable means of securing the Internet and its connected devices.10aconsumers10acybersecurity10aHypponen’s law10aInternet of Things10aIOT10alegislation10amanufacturers10asecurity engineering10asmart devices10avulnerability1 aHypponen, Mikko1 aNyman, Linus  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/106600731nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245006600055210006100121260004200182300001000224490000600234653001800240653002300258653000800281653001500289653001000304653001300314653001300327100001900340700001900359700001600378700001800394700001600412856003700428       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aTIM Lecture Series – Building Trust in an IoT-Enabled World0 aTIM Lecture Series Building Trust in an IoTEnabled World  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2017  a50-540 v710acybersecurity10aInternet of Things10aIOT10aransomware10atrust10aWannaCry10awireless1 aWatson, Jeremy1 aMarshall, John1 aYoung, Mike1 aSmetny, Peter1 aMann, David  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/108401302nas a2200205   4500008004100000022001400041245010100055210006900156260004200225300000900267490000600276520067100282653002100953653001000974653002300984653001101007653002301018100001801041856003701059       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aValue Propositions for the Internet of Things: Guidance for Entrepreneurs Selling to Enterprises0 aValue Propositions for the Internet of Things Guidance for Entre  aOttawabTalent First Networkc11/2017  a5-110 v73 aThis article provides entrepreneurs with guidance to help understand and express the specific and compelling value proposition for their Internet of Things (IoT) offer. IoT enables such a wide range of possible short- and long-term opportunities that IoT entrepreneurs may fall into the trap of considering IoT generally rather than positioning their offer to a buyer in a specific manner that helps win deals. The process of understanding and expressing a compelling value proposition will help the IoT entrepreneur focus their offer, understand who the real buyer is, and demonstrate tangible value to that buyer in a manner that is directed towards winning deals.10aentrepreneurship10aguide10aInternet of Things10aoffers10avalue propositions1 aHudson, David  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/111601702nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245008600055210006900141260004200210300001000252490000600262520099500268653001601263653003201279653002301311653001901334100001701353700001901370700002401389700002201413856003701435       2016                        eng d  a1927-032100aValue Network Design for Innovations: Developing Alternative Value Network Drafts0 aValue Network Design for Innovations Developing Alternative Valu  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2016  a21-330 v63 aInformation technology increasingly permeates established products and services, thereby making them "smart". For companies, this trend necessitates new know-how in unknown fields. Hence, traditional manufacturing companies are increasingly forced to cooperate with new players within new value networks. In contradiction to value chains, value networks oftentimes exhibit no clear hierarchies and are characterized by rather weak ties between the participating players. For a company that wants to create smart products or services, the key challenge is arranging the value network such that the customer obtains a unique value while all participants profit from their engagement. In doing so, companies have to find new partners (companies, research institutes, etc.). In this article, we present a methodology to design value networks for innovations, including approaches to identify necessary competences, find suitable partners, and bundle them to powerful alternative value networks.10ainnovations10ainter-company collaboration10aInternet of Things10avalue networks1 aKage, Martin1 aDrewel, Marvin1 aGausemeier, Jürgen1 aSchneider, Marcel  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/100200725nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245003500055210003200090260004200122300000800164490000600172653002400178653001800202653002600220653002300246653002800269653002500297653002500322653001800347653002200365653003000387100001800417856003600435       2015                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (May 2015)0 aEditorial Insights May 2015  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2015  a3-40 v510abusiness ecosystems10acybersecurity10aInnovation management10aInternet of Things10anon-practicing entities10aopen source policies10aopen source software10apatent trolls10asocial innovation10atransformative innovation1 aMcPhee, Chris  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/89301999nas a2200325   4500008004100000022001400041245006900055210006800124260004200192300001000234490000600244520112200250653001101372653001501383653002001398653001901418653001601437653001801453653001501471653001401486653002301500653001501523653001501538653001301553653001301566100002101579700002001600700001701620856003601637       2015                        eng d  a1927-032100aSecuring Cyberspace: Towards an Agenda for Research and Practice0 aSecuring Cyberspace Towards an Agenda for Research and Practice  aOttawabTalent First Networkc11/2015  a26-340 v53 aIn this article, we seek to identify the important challenges preventing security in cyberspace and to identify the key questions that nations should set out to answer to play a leading role in securing cyberspace. An important assertion is that the challenge of securing cyberspace transcends the abilities of any single entity and requires a radical shift in our approach in how: i) research is conducted, ii) cybersecurity researchers are educated, iii) new defendable systems are developed, and iv) effective defensive countermeasures are deployed. Our response draws upon extensive source material and our personal experiences as cybersecurity professionals contributing to the establishment of the VENUS Cybersecurity Corporation, a not-for-profit corporation that aims to make Canada a global leader in cybersecurity. We view the challenge to be global and transdisciplinary in nature and this article to be of relevance world-wide to senior decision makers, policy makers, managers, educators, strategists, futurists, scientists, technologists, and others interested in shaping the online world of the future.10aCanada10achallenges10acountermeasures10acyber security10acybersafety10acybersecurity10acyberspace10adetection10aInternet of Things10aleadership10amitigation10aresearch10asecurity1 aLevesque, Renaud1 aWalsh, D’Arcy1 aWhyte, David  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/94300729nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245010200055210006900157260004200226300001000268490000600278653003200284653001800316653001800334653001200352653002400364653002700388653002300415653000800438100001700446856003600463       2015                        eng d  a1927-032100aTIM Lecture Series – The Internet of Everything: Fridgebots, Smart Sneakers, and Connected Cars0 aTIM Lecture Series The Internet of Everything Fridgebots Smart S  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2015  a47-490 v510aConsumer Internet of Things10acyber-attacks10acybersecurity10ahackers10aIndustrial Internet10aInternet of Everything10aInternet of Things10aIOT1 aGreene, Jeff  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/89802420nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245005700055210005700112260004200169300000900211490000600220520173600226653001901962653001601981653001401997653002302011653000802034653001002042653001702052100002102069700001902090700002102109856003602130       2014                        eng d  a1927-032100aDesigning Business Models for the Internet of Things0 aDesigning Business Models for the Internet of Things  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2014  a5-140 v43 aThis article investigates challenges pertaining to business model design in the emerging context of the Internet of Things (IOT). The evolution of business perspectives to the IOT is driven by two underlying trends: i) the change of focus from viewing the IOT primarily as a technology platform to viewing it as a business ecosystem; and ii) the shift from focusing on the business model of a firm to designing ecosystem business models. An ecosystem business model is a business model composed of value pillars anchored in ecosystems and focuses on both the firm's method of creating and capturing value as well as any part of the ecosystem's method of creating and capturing value. The article highlights three major challenges of designing ecosystem business models for the IOT, including the diversity of objects, the immaturity of innovation, and the unstructured ecosystems. Diversity refers to the difficulty of designing business models for the IOT due to a multitude of different types of connected objects combined with only modest standardization of interfaces. Immaturity suggests that quintessential IOT technologies and innovations are not yet products and services but a "mess that runs deep". The unstructured ecosystems mean that it is too early to tell who the participants will be and which roles they will have in the evolving ecosystems. The study argues that managers can overcome these challenges by using a business model design tool that takes into account the ecosystemic nature of the IOT. The study concludes by proposing the grounds for a new design tool for ecosystem business models and suggesting that "value design" might be a more appropriate term when talking about business models in ecosystems.10abusiness model10adesign tool10aecosystem10aInternet of Things10aIOT10avalue10avalue design1 aWesterlund, Mika1 aLeminen, Seppo1 aRajahonka, Mervi  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/80700854nas a2200313   4500008004100000022001400041245003600055210003300091260004200124300000800166490000600174653001800180653002400198653002000222653002100242653001800263653001500281653002300296653004200319653001400361653001600375653002900391653001400420653001300434653002200447653001700469100001800486856003600504       2014                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (July 2014)0 aEditorial Insights July 2014  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2014  a3-40 v410aambidexterity10abusiness ecosystems10abusiness models10aentrepreneurship10aimprovisation10ainnovation10aInternet of Things10aknowledge-intensive business services10aplatforms10apublic good10apublicly funded research10astandards10astrategy10avalue co-creation10avalue design1 aMcPhee, Chris  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/80602072nas a2200325   4500008004100000022001400041245006700055210006000122260004200182300000900224490000600233520119000239653001601429653001801445653001801463653001801481653002401499653001301523653002701536653002301563653001101586653001701597653001201614653001101626653001301637100001901650700002101669700002001690856003601710       2014                        eng d  a1927-032100aThe Online World of the Future: Safe, Productive, and Creative0 aOnline World of the Future Safe Productive and Creative  aOttawabTalent First Networkc10/2014  a5-120 v43 aA safer online world is required to attain higher levels of productivity and creativity. We offer a view of a future state of the online world that places safety, productivity, and creativity above all else. The online world envisaged for 2030 is safe (i.e., users communicate with accuracy and enduring confidence), productive (i.e., users make timely decisions that have an ongoing global effect), and creative (i.e., users can connect seemingly unrelated information online). The proposed view differs from other views of the future online world that are anchored around technology solutions, confrontation, deception, and personal or commercial gain. The following seven conditions characterize the proposed view of the online world: i) global-scale autonomous learning systems; ii) humans co-working with machines; iii) human factors that are authentic and transferrable; iv) global scale whole-brain communities; v) foundational knowledge that is authentic and transferrable; vi) timely productive communication; and vii) continuous technological adaptation. These conditions are expected to enable new social-behavioural, socio-technical, and organizational interaction models. 10abisociation10acybersecurity10aexcludability10afuture vision10aIndustrial Internet10aInternet10aInternet of Everything10aInternet of Things10aonline10aproductivity10arivalry10asafety10asecurity1 aBailetti, Tony1 aLevesque, Renaud1 aWalsh, D’Arcy  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/834