02033nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245007800055210006900133260004200202300001000244490000700254520135800261653001501619653001901634653001801653653002401671653002401695100001601719700001901735700001901754856003001773       2021                        eng d  a1927-032100aBarriers to Value Specification when Carrying out Digitalization Projects0 aBarriers to Value Specification when Carrying out Digitalization  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2021  a54-640 v113 aIf digitalization projects aim to effectively create value for a company, one precondition is having a shared view among company staff and project members of what the "desirable" value is. However, it has been shown that few companies fully understand the value that digitalization projects can create for them, while many companies still launch digitalization projects without having gained much understanding. This contributes to the current "alarmingly" low success rate for digitalization projects. Developing effective methods to specify the desired values of digitalization projects has hence become important. One step in developing improved specification methods is to ask what the possible barriers are to improving current value specification practices. The purpose of the current study is to address this. We analyzed several digitalization projects regarding how specifications of desired project value were carried out, finding that very limited resources are spent on specifying desired values in digitalization projects, this limits project success. Likewise, there are several barriers to increasing resources for specifying desired values. Our findings contribute to understanding the development of value specification methods that aim to overcome these barriers and thus could help improve the success rate of digitalization projects.10aautomation10adigitalization10aeffectiveness10aresource-efficiency10aValue specification1 aGrahn, Sten1 aGranlund, Anna1 aLindhult, Erik  utimreview.ca/article/144201445nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245008400055210006900139260004200208300000900250490000600259520072900265653001600994653001501010653001301025653002501038653001001063653002701073653002201100653002501122100001901147856003701166       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aSmart Farming: Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultural Innovation0 aSmart Farming Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultu  aOttawabTalent First Networkc02/2018  a7-140 v83 aThis article draws on the literature of responsible innovation to suggest concrete processes for including rights holders in the “smart” agricultural revolution. It first draws upon historical agricultural research in Canada to highlight how productivist values drove seed innovations with particular consequences for the distribution of power in the food system. Next, the article uses document analysis to suggest that a similar value framework is motivating public investment in smart farming innovations. The article is of interest to smart farming’s decision makers (from farmers to governance actors) and a broader audience – anyone interested in engendering equity through innovation-led societal transitions.10aagriculture10aautomation10abig data10amachine intelligence10apower10aresponsible innovation10asmart agriculture10atechnological values1 aBronson, Kelly  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/113500919nas a2200349   4500008004100000022001400041245004200055210003900097260004200136300000800178490000600186653002200192653001500214653001300229653001800242653001600260653002100276653002300297653000800320653001600328653002000344653001200364653001400376653002000390653002500410653001800435653002200453653002000475100001800495700001900513856003700532       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Cybersecurity (April 2017)0 aEditorial Cybersecurity April 2017  aOttawabTalent First Networkc04/2017  a3-40 v710aanomaly detection10aautomation10abig data10acybersecurity10aexploration10aHypponen’s law10aInternet of Things10aIOT10alegislation10amedical devices10aprivacy10areal time10arisk assessment10asecurity engineering10asmart devices10avalue proposition10avulnerabilities1 aMcPhee, Chris1 aWeiss, Michael  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/106501819nas a2200277   4500008004100000022001400041245006500055210005800120260004200178300001000220490000600230520101800236653002201254653001701276653001501293653001701308653001801325653001601343653002901359653002701388653002901415100002201444700001701466700002201483856003601505       2013                        eng d  a1927-032100aOn the Road to Holistic Decision Making in Adaptive Security0 aRoad to Holistic Decision Making in Adaptive Security  aOttawabTalent First Networkc08/2013  a59-640 v33 aSecurity is a critical concern in today's software systems. Besides the interconnectivity and dynamic nature of network systems, the increasing complexity in modern software systems amplifies the complexity of IT security. This fact leaves attackers one step ahead in exploiting vulnerabilities and introducing new cyberattacks. The demand for new methodologies in addressing cybersecurity is emphasized by both private and national corporations. A practical solution to dynamically manage the high complexity of IT security is adaptive security, which facilitates analysis of the system's behaviour and hence the prevention of malicious attacks in complex systems. Systems that feature adaptive security detect and mitigate security threats at runtime with little or no administrator involvement. In these systems, decisions at runtime are balanced according to quality and performance goals. This article describes the necessity of holistic decision making in such systems and paves the road to future research.10aadaptive security10aarchitecture10aautomation10acyberattacks10acybersecurity10agame theory10aholistic decision making10aself-adaptive software10aself-protecting software1 aEmami-Taba, Mahsa1 aAmoui, Mehdi1 aTahvildari, Ladan  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/717