01750nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245004200055210004200097260004200139300001000181490000600191520096600197653002001163653001701183653001901200653002201219653001101241653002501252653001801277653002401295653002401319653001301343653002201356100002401378700002001402856003801422       2019                        eng d  a1927-032100aBusiness Model Architecture by Design0 aBusiness Model Architecture by Design  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2019  a16-270 v93 aIn this article, we view business models as complex deal-making activity systems organized to create, deliver, and capture value. Unlike some other viewpoints, we emphasize both system components and their interconnection. Business activities are carried out by a network of actors drawing on a network of resources, and individual firms seek to configure these intersecting networks to enhance their competitive positioning. The business model literature refers to the significance of antecedent activities in providing context – opportunities the firm decides to pursue, the strategy adopted, and requisite capabilities. Drawing on this literature, we propose an approach to framing business model context. Drawing on the information systems literature, we identify a toolkit facilitating activity system architecture design. We suggest how this both draws out the underlying complexity of a business model and shows how a multiplicity of views makes sense.10aactivity theory10aarchitecture10abusiness model10abusiness networks10adesign10adynamic capabilities10aISO/IEC 4201010amultiple viewpoints10arelationship matrix10astrategy10aZachman framework1 aBeckett, Ronald, C.1 aDalrymple, John  uhttps://timreview.ca/article/125200757nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245003600055210003300091260004200124300000800166490000600174653001700180653001300197653001100210653001700221653002400238653002000262653001100282653002100293653002100314653001500335653002600350653001000376653002500386100001800411856003800429       2019                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (July 2019)0 aEditorial Insights July 2019  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2019  a3-40 v910aaccelerators10aadoption10aAfrica10aarchitecture10abusiness ecosystems10abusiness models10adesign10adigital payments10aentrepreneurship10aincubators10aInnovation management10aISPIM10aknowledge management1 aMcPhee, Chris  uhttps://timreview.ca/article/125000643nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245005500055210005100110260004200161300001000203490000600213653001700219653002000236653001400256653001500270653002100285653001400306653002500320653001300345100001900358856003600377       2014                        eng d  a1927-032100aTIM Lecture Series – The Business of Open Source0 aTIM Lecture Series The Business of Open Source  aOttawabTalent First Networkc01/2014  a28-310 v410aarchitecture10abusiness models10acommunity10aengagement10aentrepreneurship10alicensing10aopen source software10apatterns1 aWeiss, Michael  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/75900727nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245005800055210005500113260004200168300001000210490000600220653002500226653001700251653001500268653001700283653001800300653001100318653001400329653001500343653002200358653001300380653001300393100001900406856003600425       2013                        eng d  a1927-032100aQ&A. Should Startups Care about Application Security?0 aQA Should Startups Care about Application Security  aOttawabTalent First Networkc07/2013  a50-520 v310aapplication security10aarchitecture10achecklists10acode reviews10acybersecurity10adesign10adetection10aprevention10asoftware security10astartups10atraining1 aKoussa, Sherif  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/70601819nas a2200277   4500008004100000022001400041245006500055210005800120260004200178300001000220490000600230520101800236653002201254653001701276653001501293653001701308653001801325653001601343653002901359653002701388653002901415100002201444700001701466700002201483856003601505       2013                        eng d  a1927-032100aOn the Road to Holistic Decision Making in Adaptive Security0 aRoad to Holistic Decision Making in Adaptive Security  aOttawabTalent First Networkc08/2013  a59-640 v33 aSecurity is a critical concern in today's software systems. Besides the interconnectivity and dynamic nature of network systems, the increasing complexity in modern software systems amplifies the complexity of IT security. This fact leaves attackers one step ahead in exploiting vulnerabilities and introducing new cyberattacks. The demand for new methodologies in addressing cybersecurity is emphasized by both private and national corporations. A practical solution to dynamically manage the high complexity of IT security is adaptive security, which facilitates analysis of the system's behaviour and hence the prevention of malicious attacks in complex systems. Systems that feature adaptive security detect and mitigate security threats at runtime with little or no administrator involvement. In these systems, decisions at runtime are balanced according to quality and performance goals. This article describes the necessity of holistic decision making in such systems and paves the road to future research.10aadaptive security10aarchitecture10aautomation10acyberattacks10acybersecurity10agame theory10aholistic decision making10aself-adaptive software10aself-protecting software1 aEmami-Taba, Mahsa1 aAmoui, Mehdi1 aTahvildari, Ladan  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/717