01445nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245008400055210006900139260004200208300000900250490000600259520072900265653001600994653001501010653001301025653002501038653001001063653002701073653002201100653002501122100001901147856003701166       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aSmart Farming: Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultural Innovation0 aSmart Farming Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultu  aOttawabTalent First Networkc02/2018  a7-140 v83 aThis article draws on the literature of responsible innovation to suggest concrete processes for including rights holders in the “smart” agricultural revolution. It first draws upon historical agricultural research in Canada to highlight how productivist values drove seed innovations with particular consequences for the distribution of power in the food system. Next, the article uses document analysis to suggest that a similar value framework is motivating public investment in smart farming innovations. The article is of interest to smart farming’s decision makers (from farmers to governance actors) and a broader audience – anyone interested in engendering equity through innovation-led societal transitions.10aagriculture10aautomation10abig data10amachine intelligence10apower10aresponsible innovation10asmart agriculture10atechnological values1 aBronson, Kelly  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/113501697nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245007300055210006900128260004200197300001000239490000600249520097000255653003001225653002101255653001401276653002601290653001601316653003701332653001701369653001001386100002301396856003601419       2012                        eng d  a1927-032100aGovernance of Open Source Software Foundations: Who Holds the Power?0 aGovernance of Open Source Software Foundations Who Holds the Pow  aOttawabTalent First Networkc12/2012  a37-420 v23 aThe research reported in this article attempts to discover who holds the power in open source software foundations through the analysis of governance documents. Artificial neural network analysis is used to analyse the content of the bylaws of six open source foundations (Apache, Eclipse, GNOME, Plone, Python, and SPI) for the purpose of identifying power structures. Results of the research suggest that: i) the actions of an open source software foundation are centered around one of three groups: Members, Chairman/President/Executive Director, and Board of Directors; ii) in only one of the six foundations is the Board of Directors responsible for both the community and the product; and iii) artificial neural network analysis of the content of bylaws provides unbiased insights of the power structure of open source software foundations. These results may prove useful to those who contribute to open source foundations and use their products and services.10aartificial neural network10acontent analysis10akeystones10amanagement structures10aopen source10aopen source software foundations10aorganization10apower1 aPrattico, Ludovico  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/636