@article {945,
	title = {TIM Lecture Series {\textendash} Creating Life-Saving Media as a Social Entrepreneur},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {11/2015},
	pages = {40-42},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {animation, culture shift, film, global health, humanitarian, media, public health, social entrepreneurship, social innovation, societal issues},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/945},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/945},
	author = {Firdaus Kharas}
}
@article {854,
	title = {Does Social Innovation Require Social Entrepreneurship?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {12/2014},
	pages = {17-26},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Social innovation is now considered an important element in the search for solutions to pressing social problems. Inspired by Schumpeter{\textquoteright}s conceptualization of innovation, "social" entrepreneurship is thought to contribute to "social" innovation in more or less the same way that "normal" entrepreneurship consists of the introduction of "normal" innovations. In the literature as well as in practice, the definition of concepts such as social innovation and social entrepreneurship has led to considerable confusion. We aim to bring clarity to the debate, arguing that every entrepreneurial action results in some measure of intended or unintended social innovation, regardless of whether the entrepreneurs in question are considered or consider themselves "social" or not. We test our insights in an investigation of 20 social enterprises that have a commercial business model.},
	keywords = {entrepreneurship, institutional change, Schumpeter, social change, social entrepreneurship, social innovation, sustainability},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/854},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/854},
	author = {Asceline Groot and Ben Dankbaar}
}
@article {852,
	title = {Editorial: Innovation and Entrepreneurship (December 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {12/2014},
	pages = {3-5},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {3D printing, business models, commercialization, disruption, entrepreneurship, innovation, innovation capacity, innovation culture, patents, social entrepreneurship, social innovation, spinoffs, university technology transfer, value propositions},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/852},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/852},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {822,
	title = {Q\&A. What is the Future of Entrepreneurship in India?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {08/2014},
	pages = {46-49},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {ecosystem, entrepreneurship, incubators, India, social entrepreneurship, support agencies},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/822},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/822},
	author = {Ritu Dubey}
}
@article {576,
	title = {Being Disruptive: How Open Growth is Delivering Effective Social Change at a Fast Pace},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {07/2012},
	pages = {16-20},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Both innovators and funders need tools that map the entire constellation of solutions in a sector. Innovators, often labeled and isolated as system disruptors, need to be linked with their global peers offering and seeking each others proven strategies to accelerate positive change. The impact investing space needs a simple, open, and transparent way to find, convene, support, and track the progress of innovators.

This article describes how the Ashoka Changemakers.com online community creates a space for: investors to find and support multiple innovations; social innovators to find each other, work together, and source funds; and disruptive innovations to grow over time where disruptive change is needed, fast. Crowd-sourcing, transparency, and open growth are keys to accelerating large-scale change and creating a world of changemakers.
},
	keywords = {crowdsourcing, open growth, open source, scaling-up, social entrepreneurship, social innovation, social networks, transparency},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/576},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/576},
	author = {Elisha Muskat and Delyse Sylvester}
}
@article {565,
	title = {Developmental Impact Analysis of an ICT-Enabled Scalable Healthcare Model in BRICS Economies},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06/2012},
	pages = {25-31},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article highlights the need for initiating a healthcare business model in a grassroots, emerging-nation context. This article{\textquoteright}s backdrop is a history of chronic anomalies afflicting the healthcare sector in India and similarly placed BRICS nations. In these countries, a significant percentage of populations remain deprived of basic healthcare facilities and emergency services. Community (primary care) services are being offered by public and private stakeholders as a panacea to the problem. Yet, there is an urgent need for specialized (tertiary care) services at all levels. 
As a response to this challenge, an all-inclusive health-exchange system (HES) model, which utilizes information communication technology (ICT) to provide solutions in rural India, has been developed. The uniqueness of the model lies in its innovative hub-and-spoke architecture and its emphasis on affordability, accessibility, and availability to the masses. This article describes a developmental impact analysis (DIA) that was used to assess the impact of this model. The article contributes to the knowledge base of readers by making them aware of the healthcare challenges emerging nations are facing and ways to mitigate those challenges using entrepreneurial solutions.},
	keywords = {business model innovation, developmental Impact analysis, DIA, health technology, social entrepreneurship},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/565},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/565},
	author = {Punit Saurabh and Bhaskar Bhowmick and Amrita and Dhrubes Biswas}
}
@article {573,
	title = {Editorial: Social Innovation (July 2012)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {07/2012},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {charities, community sector, nonprofit, social entrepreneurship, social innovation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/573},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/573},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Stephen Huddart}
}
@article {557,
	title = {An Overview of Four Issues on Technology Entrepreneurship in the TIM Review},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {05/2012},
	pages = {28-34},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The field of technology entrepreneurship is in its infancy when compared to other fields such as economics and management. Articles on technology entrepreneurship have been published in at least 62 journals, of which only 18 contribute to technology innovation management or entrepreneurship. Less than a handful of these 62 journals are considered to be "good" journals and none can claim a leadership position in technology entrepreneurship. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the 20 journal articles published in the February, March, April, and May 2012 issues of the Technology Innovation Management Review (TIM Review).},
	keywords = {creative destruction, global entrepreneurship, journal articles, social entrepreneurship, technology entrepreneurship, theory},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/557},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/557},
	author = {Tony Bailetti and Sonia D. Bot and Tom Duxbury and David Hudson and Chris McPhee and Steven Muegge and Michael Weiss and Jonathan Wells and Mika Westerlund}
}
@article {523,
	title = {Social Entrepreneurship: Definition and Boundaries},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {02/2012},
	pages = {22-27},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {While individuals may be publicly recognized as social entrepreneurs for their contributions to improve the welfare of communities, the field of social entrepreneurship continues to struggle to gain academic legitimacy. Social entrepreneurship is a term in search of a good definition. The current use of the term seems vague and limitless; it needs boundaries to demarcate its function. The lack of a common definition hinders research and raises questions about which social or profit-making activities fall within the spectrum of social entrepreneurship. To become an important stream in the entrepreneurship literature, social entrepreneurship needs to be properly defined and it requires a theoretical framework that links it to the theory of entrepreneurship. This article builds on the literature to define social entrepreneurship, discusses the boundaries of socially-oriented entrepreneurial activities, and positions the social entrepreneur in the spectrum of entrepreneurship. },
	keywords = {social enterprise, social entrepreneur, social entrepreneurship},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/523},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/523},
	author = {Samer Abu-Saifan}
}
