@article {1162,
	title = {Additive Manufacturing and Business Models: Current Knowledge and Missing Perspectives},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {06/2018},
	pages = {15-33},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Additive manufacturing, that is 3D printing technology, may change the way companies operate their businesses. This article adopts a business model perspective to create an understanding of what we know about these changes. It summarizes current knowledge on additive manufacturing within management and business research, and it discusses future research directions in relation to business models for additive manufacturing. Using the scientific database Web of Science, 116 journal articles were identified. The literature review reveals that most research concerns manufacturing optimization. A more holistic view of the changes that additive manufacturing may bring about for firms is needed, as is more research on changed value propositions, and customer/sales-related issues. The article contributes to previous research by systematically summarizing additive manufacturing research in the business and management literature, and by highlighting areas for further investigation related to the business models of individual firms.},
	keywords = {3D printing, additive manufacturing, business model, literature review},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1162},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1162},
	author = {Christina {\"O}berg and Tawfiq Shams and Nader Asnafi}
}
@article {1160,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (June 2018)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {06/2018},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {3D printing, additive manufacturing, Amazon, boundary spanning, business models, civic innovation, culture, entrepreneurship, innovation integrators, knowledge transfer, living labs, sociotechnical systems, startup, university{\textendash}industry collaboration},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1160},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1160},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {942,
	title = {3D Printing and Its Disruptive Impacts on Supply Chains of the Future},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {11/2015},
	pages = {20-25},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {3D printing technology has emerged as one of the most disruptive innovations to impact the global supply chain and logistics industry. The technology is impacting our personal and professional lives, with some claiming that the technology will revolutionize and replace existing manufacturing technologies, while others argue that the technology merely enhances some aspects of the production process. Whether evolutionary or revolutionary, 3D printing technology is recognized as a striking trend that will significantly impact supply chains. Although the expansion of 3D printing in the private consumer market is an interesting development in its own right, the biggest potential for disruption lies in industrial applications and how 3D printing will influence supply chains of the future. In this article, we examine the areas of the supply chain most likely to be disrupted by 3D printing technology and we identify the key questions that must be answered in a roadmap for future research and practice. While we seek answers to these questions, we suggest that managers should develop a flexible change management strategy to mitigate the effects of disruption to their future supply chains and take advantage of the resulting opportunities. Those that do nothing will be left wanting, because the influence of 3D printing technology on supply chains is expected to grow. },
	keywords = {3D printing, additive manufacturing, disruptive innovation, logistics, supply chain},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/942},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/942},
	author = {Sebastian Mohr and Omera Khan}
}
@article {855,
	title = {Disruptive Innovation vs Disruptive Technology: The Disruptive Potential of the Value Propositions of 3D Printing Technology Startups},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {12/2014},
	pages = {27-36},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article describes an empirical study focusing on the classification of existing business opportunities in the 3D printing technology sector. The authors address three research questions. First, how do technology startups integrate new 3D printing technologies into specific market offers? Second, which value propositions are most attractive in terms of interest from the public and investors? Third, how does the degree of disruptiveness of value propositions relate to the degree of interest from the public and investors? The most notable finding is the link between the business traction of 3D printing technology startups and the degree of disruptiveness of their value propositions. Thus, the article provides empirical support for the conceptualization of the degree of disruptiveness of the value proposition as a metric for the evaluation of the business potential of new technology startups. },
	keywords = {3D printing technology, additive manufacturing, disruptive innovation, value proposition},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/855},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/855},
	author = {Finn Hahn and S{\o}ren Jensen and Stoyan Tanev}
}
