@article {1283,
	title = {Design Rules for {\textquoteleft}Triple Helix{\textquoteright} Organizations},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {11/2019},
	pages = {54-63},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {54},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The image of the triple helix with three forces spiraling around each other has proven to be a powerful and inspiring image of the collaboration between government, business, and academia. The partners in such collaborative arrangements no doubt share an interest in making the collaboration successful. However, they also have specific interests and goals of their own. Too many triple helix arrangements have failed, because they did not consider this basic fact. Achieving their own goals is not necessarily the intention with which partners enter the collaborative effort, but they may well end up following this strategy. We start this paper with a brief description of what can be considered a typical case of \&lsquo;successful failure\&rsquo; in a triple helix organization. We then review the literature regarding reasons for success or failure of triple helix organizations. We find that transparency and credible sanctions for self-interested behaviour are important requirements for successful triple helix arrangements. We then use notions from cybernetics and organizational design to develop basic rules for the design of triple helix arrangements. Basically, these rules and arrangements aim to ensure that self-interest and common purpose will concur.},
	keywords = {design rules, leadership, motivation, sanctions, triple helix},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1283},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1283},
	author = {Ben Dankbaar}
}
@article {1278,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (November 2019)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {11/2019},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {3},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {artificial intelligence, competitive advantage, cybersecurity, deep learning, Deepfake, design rules, digitalization, entrepreneurial ecosystems, entrepreneurial university, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship education, fake news, innovation, international entrepreneurship, leadership, Learning Capabilities, marketing, motivation, new venture teams, quadruple helix, sanctions, SMEs, teamwork, triple helix, university business incubation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1278},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1278},
	author = {Stoyan Tanev and Gregory Sandstrom}
}
@article {838,
	title = {Q\&A. What Motivates Cyber-Attackers?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {10/2014},
	pages = {40-42},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {cyber-attack, cybercrime, cybersecurity, hackers, motivation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/838},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/838},
	author = {Chen Han and Rituja Dongre}
}
