@article {1480,
	title = {Can Blockchain Improve Healthcare Management?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {12},
	year = {2022},
	month = {05/2022},
	pages = {22010203},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {-},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The paper sets out to examine the relevance of blockchain technology for healthcare management in general, and specifically for consumer medical electronics and connected portable devices. After considering the pivotal role of electronic health records in the first part of the paper, we then analyze the holistic transformative role of blockchain for healthcare data management, illustrated by a set of emerging use cases. Following that, we address the fast-growing segment of consumer medical electronics and the Internet of Medical Things. Finally, we highlight the digital community-building role of public private partnerships for emerging healthcare strategy design.},
	keywords = {Blockchain Technology, Electronic Health Records, healthcare, Internet of Things},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1480},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1480},
	author = {Marc Pilkington}
}
@article {1449,
	title = {Distributed Ledger Technologies and Social Machines: How to {\textquotedblleft}smartify{\textquotedblright} the economy with blockchain-based digital extension services?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2021},
	month = {06/2021},
	pages = {42-57},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {42},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This paper examines the broad impact of digitalization on economic development. More specifically, it addresses the computer science-derived notion of "social machines", along with the invention of distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) (or blockchain), as potential signposts on the pathway to "smart(er) digital economies". The paper investigates blockchain-based ecosystems as examples of social machines that assist in economic "smartification" and development. It looks at distributed ledger-based communities (DLCs) that provide examples of functioning social machines for a variety of business and personal network communications purposes. It then analyses the scaleup of DLT-based social machines by comparison with "extension services", largely in education and agriculture, which are currently undergoing processes of digitalization. Overall, this conceptual study examines the general horizons and potential impact of blockchain and social machines on the provision of online products and services, across a range of sectors and industries. The paper offers interpretative assistance to managers, entrepreneurs, technology experts, and academics with lingering questions about blockchain in and for business and economic development.},
	keywords = {artificial intelligence, blockchain, digital economy, digital platform, distributed ledger technology, economic development, extension services, extension thinking, innovation diffusion, Internet of Things, ledger community, smartification, social machines, web science},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1449},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1449},
	author = {Gregory Sandstrom}
}
@article {1141,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (March 2018)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {03/2018},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {analytics, big data, business models, closed innovation, ecosystems, emerging economies, innovation, internationalization, Internet of Things, Open innovation, technology startups, value creation, value propositions},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1141},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1141},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1142,
	title = {Value Creation in the Internet of Things: Mapping Business Models and Ecosystem Roles},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {03/2018},
	pages = {5-15},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The increasing connectivity provided by the Internet of Things (IoT) supports novel business opportunities for actors in overlapping service systems. Therefore, the co-creative nature of IoT business needs to be further studied. This article reports an empirical study on a European IoT initiative. It contributes to the understudied area of IoT ecosystem dynamics by describing different actor roles and activities in the IoT use cases, and their implications for value creation in IoT ecosystems. Our findings show how IoT ecosystem actors may take the roles of ideator, designer, or intermediary in different IoT design layers, and we recommend this perspective to better understand and describe ecosystem business models. We also discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of our findings.},
	keywords = {business model, ecosystem, Internet of Things, role, value co-creation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1142},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1142},
	author = {Heini Ik{\"a}valko and Petra Turkama and Anssi Smedlund}
}
@article {1067,
	title = {Big Data and Individual Privacy in the Age of the Internet of Things},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {04/2017},
	pages = {12-24},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The availability of {\textquotedblleft}big data{\textquotedblright} and {\textquotedblleft}smart{\textquotedblright} products are credited with advancing solutions to complex problems in medicine, transportation, and education, among others. However, with big data comes big responsibility. The collection, storage, sharing, and analysis of data are far outpacing individual privacy protections, whether technological or legislative. The Internet of Things (IoT), with its promise to create networks of networks, will magnify individual data privacy threats. Recent data breaches, exposing the personal information of millions of users, provide insight into the vulnerability of personal data. Although seemingly expansive, there are core individual privacy issues that are central to current big data breaches and anticipated IoT threats. This article examines both big data and the IoT using examples of data privacy breaches to illustrate the impact of individual data loss. Furthermore, the article examines the complexity of tackling technological and legislative challenges in protecting individual privacy. It concludes by summarizing these issues in terms of the future implications of the IoT and the loss of privacy. },
	keywords = {big data, cybersecurity, data breaches, Internet of Things, IOT, privacy, smart devices},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1067},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1067},
	author = {Mackenzie Adams}
}
@article {1065,
	title = {Editorial: Cybersecurity (April 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {04/2017},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {anomaly detection, automation, big data, cybersecurity, exploration, Hypponen{\textquoteright}s law, Internet of Things, IOT, legislation, medical devices, privacy, real time, risk assessment, security engineering, smart devices, value proposition, vulnerabilities},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1065},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1065},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Michael Weiss}
}
@article {1079,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (June 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {06/2017},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {competitive intelligence, creativity, cybersecurity, entrepreneurship, internal communication management, Internet of Things, service design, training, university{\textendash}industry collaboration},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1079},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1079},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1115,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (November 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {11/2017},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {academic publishing, business models, cities, collaboration, entrepreneurship, fourth industrial revolution, Industry 4.0, Internet of Things, IOT, living labs, open access, open data, Open innovation, social innovation, value propositions},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1115},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1115},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1117,
	title = {The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {11/2017},
	pages = {12-20},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The rapid pace of technological developments played a key role in the previous industrial revolutions. However, the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) and its embedded technology diffusion progress is expected to grow exponentially in terms of technical change and socioeconomic impact. Therefore, coping with such transformation require a holistic approach that encompasses innovative and sustainable system solutions and not just technological ones. In this article, we propose a framework that can facilitate the interaction between technological and social innovation to continuously come up with proactive, and hence timely, sustainable strategies. These strategies can leverage economic rewards, enrich society at large, and protect the environment. The new forthcoming opportunities that will be generated through the next industrial wave are gigantic at all levels. However, the readiness for such revolutionary conversion require coupling the forces of technological innovation and social innovation under the sustainability umbrella. },
	keywords = {fourth industrial revolution, Industry 4.0, Internet of Things, social innovation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1117},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1117},
	author = {Rabeh Morrar and Husam Arman and Saeed Mousa}
}
@article {1066,
	title = {The Internet of (Vulnerable) Things: On Hypponen{\textquoteright}s Law, Security Engineering, and IoT Legislation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {04/2017},
	pages = {5-11},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The Internet of Things (IoT) and the resulting network-connectedness of everyday objects and appliances in our lives bring not only new features and possibilities, but also significant security concerns. These security concerns have resulted in vulnerabilities ranging from those limited in effect to a single device to vulnerabilities that have enabled IoT-based botnets to take over hundreds of thousands of devices to be used for illegal purposes. This article discusses the vulnerable nature of the IoT {\textendash} as symbolized by Hypponen{\textquoteright}s law {\textendash} and the parts both manufacturers and consumers play in these vulnerabilities. This article makes the case for the importance of security engineering for IoT manufacturers, highlights some significant issues to help consumers address these vulnerabilities, and argues for legislation as perhaps the only reliable means of securing the Internet and its connected devices.},
	keywords = {consumers, cybersecurity, Hypponen{\textquoteright}s law, Internet of Things, IOT, legislation, manufacturers, security engineering, smart devices, vulnerability},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1066},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1066},
	author = {Mikko Hypponen and Linus Nyman}
}
@article {1084,
	title = {TIM Lecture Series {\textendash} Building Trust in an IoT-Enabled World},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {06/2017},
	pages = {50-54},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {cybersecurity, Internet of Things, IOT, ransomware, trust, WannaCry, wireless},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1084},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1084},
	author = {Jeremy Watson and John Marshall and Mike Young and Peter Smetny and David Mann}
}
@article {1116,
	title = {Value Propositions for the Internet of Things: Guidance for Entrepreneurs Selling to Enterprises},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {11/2017},
	pages = {5-11},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article provides entrepreneurs with guidance to help understand and express the specific and compelling value proposition for their Internet of Things (IoT) offer. IoT enables such a wide range of possible short- and long-term opportunities that IoT entrepreneurs may fall into the trap of considering IoT generally rather than positioning their offer to a buyer in a specific manner that helps win deals. The process of understanding and expressing a compelling value proposition will help the IoT entrepreneur focus their offer, understand who the real buyer is, and demonstrate tangible value to that buyer in a manner that is directed towards winning deals.},
	keywords = {entrepreneurship, guide, Internet of Things, offers, value propositions},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1116},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1116},
	author = {David Hudson}
}
@article {1002,
	title = {Value Network Design for Innovations: Developing Alternative Value Network Drafts},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {07/2016},
	pages = {21-33},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Information technology increasingly permeates established products and services, thereby making them "smart". For companies, this trend necessitates new know-how in unknown fields. Hence, traditional manufacturing companies are increasingly forced to cooperate with new players within new value networks. In contradiction to value chains, value networks oftentimes exhibit no clear hierarchies and are characterized by rather weak ties between the participating players. For a company that wants to create smart products or services, the key challenge is arranging the value network such that the customer obtains a unique value while all participants profit from their engagement. In doing so, companies have to find new partners (companies, research institutes, etc.). In this article, we present a methodology to design value networks for innovations, including approaches to identify necessary competences, find suitable partners, and bundle them to powerful alternative value networks.},
	keywords = {innovations, inter-company collaboration, Internet of Things, value networks},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1002},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1002},
	author = {Martin Kage and Marvin Drewel and J{\"u}rgen Gausemeier and Marcel Schneider}
}
@article {893,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (May 2015)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {05/2015},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {business ecosystems, cybersecurity, Innovation management, Internet of Things, non-practicing entities, open source policies, open source software, patent trolls, social innovation, transformative innovation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/893},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/893},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {943,
	title = {Securing Cyberspace: Towards an Agenda for Research and Practice},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {11/2015},
	pages = {26-34},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In this article, we seek to identify the important challenges preventing security in cyberspace and to identify the key questions that nations should set out to answer to play a leading role in securing cyberspace. An important assertion is that the challenge of securing cyberspace transcends the abilities of any single entity and requires a radical shift in our approach in how: i) research is conducted, ii) cybersecurity researchers are educated, iii) new defendable systems are developed, and iv) effective defensive countermeasures are deployed. Our response draws upon extensive source material and our personal experiences as cybersecurity professionals contributing to the establishment of the VENUS Cybersecurity Corporation, a not-for-profit corporation that aims to make Canada a global leader in cybersecurity. We view the challenge to be global and transdisciplinary in nature and this article to be of relevance world-wide to senior decision makers, policy makers, managers, educators, strategists, futurists, scientists, technologists, and others interested in shaping the online world of the future.},
	keywords = {Canada, challenges, countermeasures, cyber security, cybersafety, cybersecurity, cyberspace, detection, Internet of Things, leadership, mitigation, research, security},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/943},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/943},
	author = {Renaud Levesque and D{\textquoteright}Arcy Walsh and David Whyte}
}
@article {898,
	title = {TIM Lecture Series {\textendash} The Internet of Everything: Fridgebots, Smart Sneakers, and Connected Cars},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {05/2015},
	pages = {47-49},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {Consumer Internet of Things, cyber-attacks, cybersecurity, hackers, Industrial Internet, Internet of Everything, Internet of Things, IOT},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/898},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/898},
	author = {Jeff Greene}
}
@article {807,
	title = {Designing Business Models for the Internet of Things},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {07/2014},
	pages = {5-14},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article investigates challenges pertaining to business model design in the emerging context of the Internet of Things (IOT). The evolution of business perspectives to the IOT is driven by two underlying trends: i) the change of focus from viewing the IOT primarily as a technology platform to viewing it as a business ecosystem; and ii) the shift from focusing on the business model of a firm to designing ecosystem business models. An ecosystem business model is a business model composed of value pillars anchored in ecosystems and focuses on both the firm{\textquoteright}s method of creating and capturing value as well as any part of the ecosystem{\textquoteright}s method of creating and capturing value. The article highlights three major challenges of designing ecosystem business models for the IOT, including the diversity of objects, the immaturity of innovation, and the unstructured ecosystems. Diversity refers to the difficulty of designing business models for the IOT due to a multitude of different types of connected objects combined with only modest standardization of interfaces. Immaturity suggests that quintessential IOT technologies and innovations are not yet products and services but a "mess that runs deep". The unstructured ecosystems mean that it is too early to tell who the participants will be and which roles they will have in the evolving ecosystems. The study argues that managers can overcome these challenges by using a business model design tool that takes into account the ecosystemic nature of the IOT. The study concludes by proposing the grounds for a new design tool for ecosystem business models and suggesting that "value design" might be a more appropriate term when talking about business models in ecosystems.},
	keywords = {business model, design tool, ecosystem, Internet of Things, IOT, value, value design},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/807},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/807},
	author = {Mika Westerlund and Seppo Leminen and Mervi Rajahonka}
}
@article {806,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (July 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {07/2014},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {ambidexterity, business ecosystems, business models, entrepreneurship, improvisation, innovation, Internet of Things, knowledge-intensive business services, platforms, public good, publicly funded research, standards, strategy, value co-creation, value design},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/806},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/806},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {834,
	title = {The Online World of the Future: Safe, Productive, and Creative},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {10/2014},
	pages = {5-12},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {A safer online world is required to attain higher levels of productivity and creativity. We offer a view of a future state of the online world that places safety, productivity, and creativity above all else. The online world envisaged for 2030 is safe (i.e., users communicate with accuracy and enduring confidence), productive (i.e., users make timely decisions that have an ongoing global effect), and creative (i.e., users can connect seemingly unrelated information online). The proposed view differs from other views of the future online world that are anchored around technology solutions, confrontation, deception, and personal or commercial gain. The following seven conditions characterize the proposed view of the online world: i) global-scale autonomous learning systems; ii) humans co-working with machines; iii) human factors that are authentic and transferrable; iv) global scale whole-brain communities; v) foundational knowledge that is authentic and transferrable; vi) timely productive communication; and vii) continuous technological adaptation. These conditions are expected to enable new social-behavioural, socio-technical, and organizational interaction models. },
	keywords = {bisociation, cybersecurity, excludability, future vision, Industrial Internet, Internet, Internet of Everything, Internet of Things, online, productivity, rivalry, safety, security},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/834},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/834},
	author = {Tony Bailetti and Renaud Levesque and D{\textquoteright}Arcy Walsh}
}
