@article {1194,
	title = {Editorial: Innovation Strategy and Practice (November 2018)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {11/2018},
	pages = {3-3},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {best practice, collaboration, creativity, cybersecurity, framework, information security, innovation, innovation ecosystems, maturity model, method, model, practice, research, research institutions, strategy},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1194},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1194},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {1173,
	title = {Editorial: Transdisciplinary Innovation (August 2018)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {08/2018},
	pages = {3-6},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {innovation, interdisciplinary, learning, multidisciplinary, practice, transdisciplinarity, transdisciplinary},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1173},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1173},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Martin Bliemel and Mieke van der Bijl-Brouwer}
}
@article {1179,
	title = {Mixing Practices to Create Transdisciplinary Innovation: A Design-Based Approach},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {08/2018},
	pages = {60-65},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {As the problems that are our organizations are facing become more complex, dynamic, and networked, they will need to become more flexible in their ability to respond. These complex networked problem situations often cannot be tackled from a single-discipline perspective, and thus transdisciplinary innovation {\textendash} that is, innovation across and between disciplinary fields {\textendash} is becoming more important. But how can we achieve innovation in those in-between spaces, when all of our knowledge and established approaches are held within the disciplines? In this article, we look beyond the limiting confines of traditional disciplines by seeing them as collections of smaller units of action: practices. After a foray into the anatomy of practices, we discuss how a design-based approach to transdisciplinary thinking creates a framework for the mixing of practices, articulating new insights and creating new possibilities for action in the space between the established professions.},
	keywords = {disciplines, innovation, practice, transdisciplinarity, transdisciplinary education},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1179},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1179},
	author = {Kees Dorst}
}
@article {1197,
	title = {A Practice Method for Studying Creative Communities},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {11/2018},
	pages = {22-31},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Explaining innovation {\textendash} even merely spotting it actually happening {\textendash} is difficult. In this article, I introduce an industry-friendly approach that will enable practitioners and researchers alike to observe, interpret, and understand the different types of creativities {\textendash} the raw materials necessary for innovation {\textendash} that happen in creative communities. The Practice Method for Studying Creative Communities (PMSCC) is based on theories developed by Nonaka and Takeuchi. However, unlike mainstream practice-oriented methods, the PMSCC does not necessitate the use of theory-heavy conceptualizations; instead, it focuses on the everyday, creative micro-interactions in communities. As I describe in this article, the PMSCC offers practitioners and researchers an effective way to gain new insights into an otherwise relatively opaque process. Besides outlining the method, I also present results from a research project utilizing the PMSCC, showing how the method can produce worthwhile findings, foster new insights, and help practitioners hone their creative processes.},
	keywords = {communities, creativity, innovation, practice, research method, teamwork},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1197},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1197},
	author = {Pekka Buttler}
}
@article {791,
	title = {Widening the Perspective on Industrial Innovation: A Service-Dominant-Logic Approach},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {05/2014},
	pages = {31-39},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The servitization of industry has progressed from services as add-ons to services as solutions. Today, industrial innovation needs an even broader perspective that moves towards service-dominant logic. This logic emphasizes value co-creation in actor-to-actor networks and requires new organizational structures and practices in industry. The article presents the case of a Nordic manufacturer of arc welding equipment that has gone through an extensive development program to become more customer and service oriented. An innovative offering created during the program is analyzed as an example in order to gain deeper insight about the concrete application of service-dominant logic in business. In addition to the outcome perspective, the article discusses the implications of the service-dominant logic for innovation practices. The article illustrates the behaviour of cutting-edge servitizing manufacturers and argues that similar behaviour can be expected to become a necessity in all industrial companies with large structural changes.},
	keywords = {co-development, industrial service, practice, systemic innovation, value co-creation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/791},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/791},
	author = {Heidi M. E. Korhonen}
}
