@article {1396,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (October 2020)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {10/2020},
	pages = {3-3},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {3},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {Advanced Analytics, AI maturity. Data science, AI value chain, AI-driven platform innovation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), big data, business decision-making, business model components, business models, content analysis, data-dominant logic, dominant logic, empirical study, enterprise platform, industries, online communication, online data collection, organizational and managerial requirements, principal component analysis, R\&D, research and development, secondary data. Sustainability, SMEs. Disruptive innovation, sustainable innovation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1396},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1396},
	author = {Gregory Sandstrom}
}
@article {1394,
	title = {A Systematic Analysis of how Practitioners Articulate Business Models across Disruptive Industries},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {10/2020},
	pages = {29-42},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {29},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Ongoing debates surround the role of business models in understanding the dynamics related to disruptive innovation. Too little is still known about how practitioners highlight different characteristics of business models across industries confronted with disruptive dynamics. This shortcoming in current debates hampers a better understanding of the context-dependent phenomenon of "disruption", ultimately limiting the development of adequate business strategies for incumbents and entrepreneurs alike. Consequently, we generated a systematic database of communicated business models from 1,095 relevant press releases and company reports published between 1995 and 2019. The business models from the retrieved articles were assigned to their corresponding industry using the Global Industry Categorization Standard (GICS) to allow for diverse categorization. Subsequently, we performed a deductive coding procedure, building on accepted business model component classifications. Our study contributes insights about relevant business model components, drawing on practitioner experiences in the face of disruptive dynamics.},
	keywords = {business model components, business models, content analysis, disruptive innovation, industries, secondary data},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1394},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1394},
	author = {Alina Marie Herting and Alexander Lennart Schmidt}
}
@article {636,
	title = {Governance of Open Source Software Foundations: Who Holds the Power?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {12/2012},
	pages = {37-42},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The research reported in this article attempts to discover who holds the power in open source software foundations through the analysis of governance documents. Artificial neural network analysis is used to analyse the content of the bylaws of six open source foundations (Apache, Eclipse, GNOME, Plone, Python, and SPI) for the purpose of identifying power structures. Results of the research suggest that: i) the actions of an open source software foundation are centered around one of three groups: Members, Chairman/President/Executive Director, and Board of Directors; ii) in only one of the six foundations is the Board of Directors responsible for both the community and the product; and iii) artificial neural network analysis of the content of bylaws provides unbiased insights of the power structure of open source software foundations. These results may prove useful to those who contribute to open source foundations and use their products and services.},
	keywords = {artificial neural network, content analysis, keystones, management structures, open source, open source software foundations, organization, power},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/636},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/636},
	author = {Ludovico Prattico}
}
