@article {1404,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (November 2020)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {11/2020},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {3},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {AI innovation and maturity, and diaspora entrepreneurs., artificial intelligence, confidential information, criminal law, digitally enhanced teamwork, economic espionage, entrepreneurship, health technology, immigrants, Innovation management, living labs, migration, Multidisciplinarity, situated practice, small and medium-sized enterprises, stakeholder participation, sustainability, trade secrets, transnationals},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1404},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1404},
	author = {Stoyan Tanev and Gregory Sandstrom}
}
@article {1400,
	title = {{\textquotedblleft}I Stood By and Watched{\textquotedblright}:  An Autoethnography of Stakeholder Participation in a Living Lab},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {11/2020},
	pages = {19-30},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {19},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {An emerging and innovative way of organizing projects in health technology and innovation is the so-called "living lab" Because of their characteristics, living labs may provide a solution to a very old problem: how to facilitate the meaningful participation of stakeholders in science and technology? In this article, I (we use a first-person perspective in the paper) aim to contribute to the literature by providing an account of my experiences as a participation researcher with stakeholder participation in a living lab in the Netherlands. I participated in a yearlong project on ensuring freedom for residents in a closed psychogeriatric ward. Using three key moments from that experience, I illustrate why participation was the intention, but was harder to achieve in practice. Participation processes and living labs are situated in specific social and physical contexts. I discuss the "situatedness" of living labs and propose to reconceptualize them as "situated practices" the value of a living lab lies in the processes of work it conducts on specific innovations situated in its local context. A key conclusion is that providing narrative descriptions of living lab projects, with attention to situatedness and stakeholder participation, can provide invaluable examples, insights, and inspirations for other researchers in the field.},
	keywords = {dementia, health technology, living labs, nursing home, psychogeriatric care, situated practice, stakeholder participation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1400},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1400},
	author = {Samuel Schrevel and Meralda Slager and Erwin de Vlugt}
}
@article {960,
	title = {The Evolution of Intermediary Activities: Broadening the Concept of Facilitation in Living Labs},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {01/2016},
	pages = {45-58},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Innovation intermediaries play an important role in open innovation endeavours. In living lab projects, where different professional identities and organizational cultures are at play, intermediary actors facilitate learning between stakeholders and manage tensions and conflicts of interest. The current living lab literature recognizes the importance and multifacetedness of these actors, but does not shed light on the work they do at a more practical level. Our study seeks to capture the variety and evolution of work tasks of user-side innovation intermediaries during and after a four-year technology project in a living lab. The study explores how these mediating actors tackle the everyday challenges of a living lab project. This article is grounded on a longitudinal qualitative case study of a innovation process for a floor monitoring system for elderly care {\textendash} the "smart floor". },
	keywords = {co-design, elderly care, facilitation, health technology, innovation intermediaries, Living lab},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/960},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/960},
	author = {Louna Hakkarainen and Sampsa Hyysalo}
}
@article {565,
	title = {Developmental Impact Analysis of an ICT-Enabled Scalable Healthcare Model in BRICS Economies},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {06/2012},
	pages = {25-31},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article highlights the need for initiating a healthcare business model in a grassroots, emerging-nation context. This article{\textquoteright}s backdrop is a history of chronic anomalies afflicting the healthcare sector in India and similarly placed BRICS nations. In these countries, a significant percentage of populations remain deprived of basic healthcare facilities and emergency services. Community (primary care) services are being offered by public and private stakeholders as a panacea to the problem. Yet, there is an urgent need for specialized (tertiary care) services at all levels. 
As a response to this challenge, an all-inclusive health-exchange system (HES) model, which utilizes information communication technology (ICT) to provide solutions in rural India, has been developed. The uniqueness of the model lies in its innovative hub-and-spoke architecture and its emphasis on affordability, accessibility, and availability to the masses. This article describes a developmental impact analysis (DIA) that was used to assess the impact of this model. The article contributes to the knowledge base of readers by making them aware of the healthcare challenges emerging nations are facing and ways to mitigate those challenges using entrepreneurial solutions.},
	keywords = {business model innovation, developmental Impact analysis, DIA, health technology, social entrepreneurship},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/565},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/565},
	author = {Punit Saurabh and Bhaskar Bhowmick and Amrita and Dhrubes Biswas}
}
