@article {1268,
	title = {World Heritage meets Smart City in an Urban-Educational Hackathon in Rauma},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {09/2019},
	pages = {45-54},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {45},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {UNESCO World Heritage cities can become smart cities if they take into account their cultural heritage and integrate diverse actors, including universities in their innovation practices. This article addresses the hackathon as an innovation contest method in the urban and educational context. Specifically, it concentrates on hackathon design, particularly the focus of the event, as well as the outputs. Although the design plays an integral part in a hackathon, particularly in goal achievement, design has not yet been thoroughly studied in mainly descriptive hackathon research. To address the subject, this article presents a case study of a dual-focused, i.e., combined urban and educational hackathon in the City of Rauma, which has a World Heritage Old Town that aims to integrate its historical uniqueness with modern city services. As a result, the article portrays the process and outputs of a hackathon carried out with the collaboration of two higher education institutions (HEIs) and the Entrepreneur Association of Rauma. Presenting conclusions for both academics and the public sector, the article contributes to the literature on urban and educational hackathons in smart cities with a heritage context.},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1268},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1268},
	author = {Anu Helena Suominen and Seija Halvari and Jari Jussila}
}
@article {1025,
	title = {Boundary Objects as Part of Knowledge Integration for Networked Innovation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {10/2016},
	pages = {25-36},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Networked innovation in co-creation networks is not possible without collaborative practices. Especially in complex projects, contextual knowledge is often spread among different stakeholders. To harness this dispersed knowledge for networked innovation, working knowledge management and collaborative practices are needed. This article addresses this need for better understanding and approaches to facilitate knowledge integration for networked innovation. We consider knowledge integration as the ability to put knowledge into action, and networked innovation as the co-created goal-driven output of selected partners. Our study focuses on describing and reporting a cross-learning type of expert knowledge-integration process with boundary objects, concrete or abstract {\textquotedblleft}bridges{\textquotedblright} for overcoming possible knowledge boundaries, in a co-creation network. This article adds knowledge on networked innovation through knowledge integration with boundary objects. The reported process will help managers to systematically approach problems requiring expert knowledge that does not exist within their own organization and to better integrate knowledge required for innovation within their project networks.},
	keywords = {boundary object, co-creation network, cross-learning, knowledge integration, networked innovation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1025},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1025},
	author = {Sari M{\"a}enp{\"a}{\"a} and Anu Helena Suominen and Rainer Breite}
}
