@article {1328,
	title = {Integrated Innovation and Sustainability Analysis for New Technologies: An approach for collaborative R\&D projects},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2020},
	month = {02/2020},
	pages = {37-50},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {37},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In order to effectively shape the impact of an innovation on sustainability, the early phases of the innovation process are crucial. This is especially true for complex collaborative R\&D projects with multiple partners. We have found that there is an increasing need for simple methods that enable partners in such R\&D projects to guide them towards sustainability-oriented innovations (SOI). In response, we have developed a methodology called Integrated Innovation and Sustainability Analysis (IISA). It is based on the early involvement of stakeholders, along with a sustainability assessment of the planned innovation to provide feedback loops into technology development. The overall goal of the method is to improve the potential impact on sustainability in the three dimensions: economic, environmental, and social. The IISA method and its application in two collaborative R\&D projects with several research and industry partners that serve as practical examples, is presented and discussed in this paper.},
	keywords = {Innovation and sustainability analysis; R\&D collaborations; sustainability-oriented innovation; stakeholder dialogue; stakeholder integration.},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1328},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1328},
	author = {Johannes Gasde and Philipp Preiss and Claus Lang-Koetz}
}
@article {977,
	title = {Corporate and Grassroot Frugal Innovation: A Comparison of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2016},
	month = {04/2016},
	pages = {5-17},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Frugal innovations aim at the development of basic solutions that are affordable for price-sensitive customer groups. This article looks at the similarities and differences between two major approaches, corporate and grassroot frugal innovation, and identifies initial ideas on how the two streams can learn from each other. The three pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental, and social) provide one of the guidelines for the comparison. The research is based on an analysis of case studies from various industries, six of which are presented in this article. },
	keywords = {case studies, corporate frugal innovation, frugal innovation, grassroots frugal innovation, startups, sustainability},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/977},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/977},
	author = {Liza Wohlfart and Mark B{\"u}nger and Claus Lang-Koetz and Frank Wagner}
}
