@article {1007, title = {Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Review and Future Research Agenda}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, volume = {6}, year = {2016}, month = {08/2016}, pages = {5-18}, publisher = {Talent First Network}, address = {Ottawa}, abstract = {The overarching theme of corporate entrepreneurship literature is to understand why some firms are able to generate higher levels of corporate entrepreneurship than others. While the extant literature has greatly advanced our understanding of entrepreneurial activities by established firms, less effort has been made to systematically review the literature to help us identify missing links and knowledge in prior studies. To address this gap, this article critically reviews previous important studies on corporate entrepreneurship and then develops a framework integrating previous research. Finally, the article suggests five potentially worthwhile avenues for future research.}, keywords = {corporate entrepreneurship, established firms, innovation, strategic renewal, venturing}, issn = {1927-0321}, doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1007}, url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1007}, author = {Kamal Sakhdari} } @article {970, title = {Underground Innovation: How to Encourage Bootlegging Employees to Disclose Their Good Ideas}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, volume = {6}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, pages = {5-12}, publisher = {Talent First Network}, address = {Ottawa}, abstract = {Employees are increasingly considered as the origin of many corporate entrepreneurial ideas. Research on {\textquotedblleft}bootlegging{\textquotedblright} posits that individuals often resort to hidden activities to elaborate their initial ideas and bring them to fruition. The origins and causes of bootlegging behaviour are well argued in the literature. Yet, less is known about what drives bootleggers to uncover their hidden ideas. This research uses field data from in-depth interviews with innovators in R\&D departments in different industries of Iran to identify factors stimulating bootleggers to reveal their underground ideas. We identified five groups of factors at individual, managerial, firm, industrial, and idea levels, explaining the revealing stage of bootlegging behaviour. The findings provide a better understanding of the later phases of bootlegging behaviour and the possible role of context-specific factors such as cultural and religious beliefs.}, keywords = {bootlegging, corporate entrepreneurship, hidden ideas, innovation, qualitative research method, R\&D departments}, issn = {1927-0321}, doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/970}, url = {http://timreview.ca/article/970}, author = {Kamal Sakhdari and Erfan Jalali Bidakhavidi} }