@article {878,
	title = {A Method and Tool to Support the Management of Systems Engineering Projects},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {03/2015},
	pages = {18-28},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Too many industrial projects still fail, mainly due to the managerial techniques used. Indeed, organizational processes are more or less specifically mentioned in systems engineering standards, but in practice, project managers tend to rely more on their own standards, which sometimes set forth practices that do not align with those of the systems engineering domain, hence the reported discrepancies that very often lead to project failure. Thus, we argue that, to improve the companies{\textquoteright} competitiveness when developing new products, cooperation between processes related to system development and project management is key to achieving performance and success. This article presents arguments that tend to support this assertion and introduces an ongoing project to develop both a method and tool that aim to integrate both domains.},
	keywords = {collaborative engineering, decision support, engineering processes, project management, system design, systems engineering, systems engineering standards},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/878},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/878},
	author = {Claude Baron and Philippe Esteban and Rui Xue and Daniel Esteve and Michel Malbert}
}
@article {194,
	title = {Open Source Software Foundations},
	journal = {Open Source Business Resource},
	year = {2008},
	month = {10/2008},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	type = {Articles},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Communities that develop open source software (OSS) are virtual entities on the Internet, not legal entities. Some open source communities establish open source software foundations (OSSF) in order to protect their intellectual property and carry out contractual arrangements. As legal entities, OSSF help communities attain their long-term goals, hold community assets, provide resources to communities, and balance interests amongst different stakeholders.

When OSS started to draw more business interests, commercial companies became involved with open source communities. The emergence of OSSF provides a good platform and opportunities for companies to exert their influence in a more official way.

This article summarizes our recent research regarding the relationships between company involvement, governance, revenue, and OSSF.
 },
	issn = {1913-6102},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/194},
	author = {Zhensheng Xie}
}
@article {115,
	title = {Open Standards vs. Open Source: a Case of the OpenAccess Standard},
	journal = {Open Source Business Resource},
	year = {2008},
	month = {01/2008},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	type = {Articles},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In this article we provide some insights into the relationship between non-code based open assets, open development processes, and open standards. The insights are based on a case study of the OpenAccess Project of the Silicon Integration Initiative. The unique relationship between the OA standard{\textquoteright}s openness, evolution and adoption is an example of how open processes could be used to enable design tool interoperability, innovation, and cooperation.},
	issn = {1913-6102},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/115},
	author = {Stoyan Tanev and Amy Xu and Jim Wilmore}
}
